Literature DB >> 25496846

Gender specific intrapartum and neonatal outcomes for term babies.

Liam Dunn1, Tomas Prior2, Ristan Greer1, Sailesh Kumar3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to document the gender specific intrapartum and neonatal outcomes in term, singleton, appropriately grown babies. STUDY
DESIGN: De-identified, routinely collected data of all women meeting inclusion criteria between 2001 and 2011 were examined (n=9223). Inclusion criteria were public (non-insured), primiparous women who had delivered singleton, appropriately grown babies at term. In this retrospective cohort study, we estimated 95% confidence intervals. Outcomes measured were maternal demographics, mode of delivery, birthweight, APGAR score, cord blood acidemia, respiratory distress, any resuscitation requirement, nursery admission and stillbirth rates.
RESULTS: The sex ratio of male babies was 1.05:1 (4718 males; 4505 females, p=0.85). Male babies were more likely to be delivered by instrumental (p=0.004) or caesarean (p<0.001). Birthweight was found to be a significant influencing factor on mode of delivery. Even after adjusting for birthweight, male babies were more likely to be delivered by instrumental delivery (OR 1.24, p<0.001), as well as by emergency caesarean for failure to progress (OR 1.24, p=0.04) and fetal distress (OR 1.38, p<0.001). Male babies, despite having greater birthweights than female babies (p<0.001), were more likely to have lower APGAR scores at 5 min (p=0.004), require neonatal resuscitation (p<0.001), develop respiratory distress (p=0.005) and require nursery admission (p<0.001). No statistical difference between male and female babies was found for cord blood acidemia (p=0.58) or stillbirth (p=0.49).
CONCLUSION: This large cohort study demonstrates that term, appropriately grown male babies in primiparous pregnancies fare more poorly in the intrapartum and neonatal periods than female babies. Even when birthweight was accounted for, male babies still required higher rates of intervention in the intrapartum and neonatal periods. This suggests gender may play an independent role in influencing pregnancy outcomes, although the underlying contributing physiology is not definitively established. The gender of the baby perhaps should be considered when counselling parents in the antepartum period.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gender; Intrapartum outcome; Neonatal outcome; Term delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25496846     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.11.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  12 in total

1.  The Effect of Fetal Gender on the Delivery Outcome in Primigravidae Women with Induced Labours for all Indications.

Authors:  Angeliki Antonakou; Dimitrios Papoutsis
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-12-01

2.  Association between fetal sex and pregnancy outcomes among women with twin pregnancies: a multicenter cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Satoru Funaki; Kohei Ogawa; Nobuaki Ozawa; Satoshi Hosoya; Aikou Okamoto; Kevin Y Urayama; Naho Morisaki; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Foetal Gender and Obstetric Outcome.

Authors:  B Schildberger; H Leitner
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Sex differences in umbilical artery Doppler indices: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Christian Widnes; Kari Flo; Tom Wilsgaard; Torvid Kiserud; Ganesh Acharya
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 5.027

5.  Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population.

Authors:  Sander Galjaard; Lieveke Ameye; Christoph C Lees; Anne Pexsters; Tom Bourne; Dirk Timmerman; Roland Devlieger
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 5.027

6.  Prediction of emergency cesarean section by measurable maternal and fetal characteristics.

Authors:  Ping Guan; Fei Tang; Guoqiang Sun; Wei Ren
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Ovine prenatal growth-restriction and sex influence fetal adipose tissue phenotype and impact postnatal lipid metabolism and adiposity in vivo from birth until adulthood.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Wallace; John S Milne; Beth W Aitken; Raymond P Aitken; Clare L Adam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Differences in pregnancy complications and outcomes by fetal gender among Japanese women: a multicenter cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Satoru Funaki; Kohei Ogawa; Nobuaki Ozawa; Aikou Okamoto; Naho Morisaki; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Sex differences in uterine artery Doppler during gestation in pregnancies complicated by placental dysfunction.

Authors:  Leah Paranavitana; Melissa Walker; Anjana Ravi Chandran; Natasha Milligan; Shiri Shinar; Clare L Whitehead; Sebastian R Hobson; Lena Serghides; W Tony Parks; Ahmet A Baschat; Christopher K Macgowan; John G Sled; John C Kingdom; Lindsay S Cahill
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 5.027

10.  Adherence to guidelines and suboptimal practice in term breech delivery with perinatal death- a population-based case-control study in Norway.

Authors:  Solveig Bjellmo; Sissel Hjelle; Lone Krebs; Elisabeth Magnussen; Torstein Vik
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.