| Literature DB >> 25496502 |
Lillian L Moller-Jacobs1, Courtney C Murdock2,3, Matthew B Thomas4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adult traits of holometabolous insects such as reproduction and survival can be shaped by conditions experienced during larval development. These "carry-over" effects influence not only individual life history and fitness, but can also impact interactions between insect hosts and parasites. Despite this, the implications of larval conditions for the transmission of human, wildlife and plant diseases that are vectored by insects remain poorly understood.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25496502 PMCID: PMC4273441 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-014-0593-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Output of vectorial capacity equation with experimental parameters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 16.7 ± 0.440 | 0.233 ± 0.009 | 0.973 | 0.3 ± 0.042 | 12 | 7.155 |
|
| 19.7 ± 0.359 | 0.293 ± 0.006 | 0.982 | 0.3 ± 0.042 | 12 | 22.462 |
Figure 1Effects of larval nutrition on larval development time, adult body size, and day of female emergence. a. Daily survival from first instar larva to adult. End of survival curve signifies all adults have emerged b. Frequency distribution of wing length in females across both treatment groups (red = 0.1 mg/individual/day, n = 213, blue = 0.3 mg/individual/day, n = 206). Groups are significantly different from each other (treatment, p = <0.001, univariate GLM). b. Daily survival from first instar larva to adult. End of survival curve signifies all adults have emerged. c. Female emergence per day; depicts total adults (all replicates, all blocks) emerged at each day after hatching. Female emergence in the low diet is characterized by fewer individuals, as well as a more extended pattern of emergence with no distinct peak.
Generalized linear model output for mosquito life history traits
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 768.72 | 94 | <0.001 | 99.03 | 94 |
| 4.36 | 6 | 0.629 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| N.A | N.A | N.A |
|
|
| N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
|
|
|
|
| N.S | N.S | N.S | N.S | N.S | N.S | N.S. | N.S. | N.S. |
|
| 0.334 |
| 0.563 | N.A | N.A | N.A | N.S | N.S | N.S | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
|
|
|
|
| N.A | N.A | N.A | N.S | N.S | N.S | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
|
|
|
|
| N.S | N.S | N.S | N.S | N.S | N.S | N.A. | N.A.1 | N.A. |
Bold indicates significance at α = 0.05. (Model fit assessed by value of deviance per degrees of freedom: larval survival = 1.450, vector density = 0.934, adult survival = 8.967, gonotrophic cycle = 0.765). P-values are reported only for significant interactions and first order terms. Table reflects the final output of a backwards-eliminated full factorial model. N.S. = not significtant, N.A. = not applicable, a = SPSS unable to compute due to numerical issues.
Figure 2Effects of larval nutrition on adult female reproductive traits and post-infectious survival. a. Length of first gonotrophic cycle, used to estimate biting rate. Treatments are significantly different from one another (p = <0.001, univariate GLM). Bars represent 95% confidence intervals around mean values. Low diet n = 55, high diet n = 90. b. Mean proportion of individuals with sperm present in spermathecae. Individuals from optimal food treatments exhibited higher mating success than those from low food treatments. Bars are significantly different from one another (p = <0.001). Error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals around the mean values. Low diet n = 85, high diet n = 93. c. Daily post infectious adult female survival of each group. Note the most significant changes occur between day four and ten.
Generalized linear model output for vector competence and parasite dynamics
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
|
|
| 1.93 | 1 | 0.164 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.944 |
|
|
|
| 1 |
|
|
| 5.57 | 6 | 0.473 | 9.04 | 6 | 0.171 |
| 6 |
| 2.20 | 6 | 0.900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
|
|
| N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
| N.A. |
| 1 |
|
|
| N.S. | N.S. | N.S. | N.S. | N.S. | N.S. |
|
|
|
| 1 |
|
|
| N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
| 1 |
|
|
| N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
| 1 |
|
Bold indicates significance at α = 0.05. (Model fit assessed by value of deviance per degrees of freedom: oocyst prevalence = 1.379, sporozoite prevalence = 1.748, oocyst intensity = 1.422, genomes per midgut = 1.286).
P-values are reported only for significant interactions and first order terms. Table reflects the final output of a backwards-eliminated full factorial model. Intensity is included as a covariate only for Plasmodium genomes, as it would be an inappropriate variable for all other parasite traits reported in this table. N.S. = not significtant, N.A. = not applicable.
Figure 3Effects of larval nutrition on parasite dynamics in midgut (oocyst) and salivary gland (sporozoite) stages. a. Prevalence of oocysts (dark-colored bars) and sporozoites (light-colored bars) in both treatments. There is no significant difference between low and high food treatment individuals for oocysts (p = 0.164, GZLM) or sporozoites (p = 0.944, GZLM). Error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals for mean values. b. Infection load for each treatment as quantified by oocyst intensity in infected individuals. Treatments are significantly different from one another (p < 0.001, GZLM). Error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals for mean values. c. Relationship between oocyst intensity and sporozoite production (Plasmodium genomes per midgut). Both oocyst intensity and total genomes are log-transformed for clarity in visualization. Treatments are significantly different from one another (p < 0.001, GZLM).