Literature DB >> 25496113

Investigating drug-target association and dissociation mechanisms using metadynamics-based algorithms.

Andrea Cavalli1, Andrea Spitaleri, Giorgio Saladino, Francesco L Gervasio.   

Abstract

CONSPECTUS: This Account highlights recent advances and discusses major challenges in the field of drug-target recognition, binding, and unbinding studied using metadynamics-based approaches, with particular emphasis on their role in structure-based design. Computational chemistry has significantly contributed to drug design and optimization in an extremely broad range of areas, including prediction of target druggability and drug likeness, de novo design, fragment screening, ligand docking, estimation of binding affinity, and modulation of ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, toxicity) properties. Computationally driven drug discovery must continuously adapt to keep pace with the evolving knowledge of the factors that modulate the pharmacological action of drugs. There is thus an urgent need for novel computational approaches that integrate the vast amount of complex information currently available for small (bio)organic compounds, biologically relevant targets and their complexes, while also accounting accurately for the thermodynamics and kinetics of drug-target association, the intrinsic dynamical behavior of biomolecular systems, and the complexity of protein-protein networks. Understanding the mechanism of drug binding to and unbinding from biological targets is fundamental for optimizing lead compounds and designing novel biologically active ones. One major challenge is the accurate description of the conformational complexity prior to and upon formation of drug-target complexes. Recently, enhanced sampling methods, including metadynamics and related approaches, have been successfully applied to investigate complex mechanisms of drugs binding to flexible targets. Metadynamics is a family of enhanced sampling techniques aimed at enhancing the rare events and reconstructing the underlying free energy landscape as a function of a set of order parameters, usually referred to as collective variables. Studies of drug binding mechanisms have predicted the most probable association and dissociation pathways and the related binding free energy profile. In addition, the availability of an efficient open-source implementation, running on cost-effective GPU (i.e., graphical processor unit) architectures, has considerably decreased the learning curve and the computational costs of the methods, and increased their adoption by the community. Here, we review the recent contributions of metadynamics and other enhanced sampling methods to the field of drug-target recognition and binding. We discuss how metadynamics has been used to search for transition states, to predict binding and unbinding paths, to treat conformational flexibility, and to compute free energy profiles. We highlight the importance of such predictions in drug discovery. Major challenges in the field and possible solutions will finally be discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25496113     DOI: 10.1021/ar500356n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  31 in total

1.  SEEKR: Simulation Enabled Estimation of Kinetic Rates, A Computational Tool to Estimate Molecular Kinetics and Its Application to Trypsin-Benzamidine Binding.

Authors:  Lane W Votapka; Benjamin R Jagger; Alexandra L Heyneman; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Unbinding Dynamics of Non-Nucleoside Inhibitors from HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase.

Authors:  Leela S Dodda; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Multiscale Methods in Drug Design Bridge Chemical and Biological Complexity in the Search for Cures.

Authors:  Rommie E Amaro; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  Nat Rev Chem       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 34.035

Review 4.  Principles and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics.

Authors:  Tatiana Maximova; Ryan Moffatt; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Selective Metabolite Transport across the Propanediol Bacterial Microcompartment Shell.

Authors:  Jiyong Park; Sunny Chun; Thomas A Bobik; Kendall N Houk; Todd O Yeates
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Lessons learned in induced fit docking and metadynamics in the Drug Design Data Resource Grand Challenge 2.

Authors:  Matthew P Baumgartner; David A Evans
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Metadynamics as a Postprocessing Method for Virtual Screening with Application to the Pseudokinase Domain of JAK2.

Authors:  Kara J Cutrona; Ana S Newton; Stefan G Krimmer; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Dancing through Life: Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Network-Centric Modeling of Allosteric Mechanisms in Hsp70 and Hsp110 Chaperone Proteins.

Authors:  Gabrielle Stetz; Gennady M Verkhivker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Drug-Target Binding by Molecular Simulation.

Authors:  Sergio Decherchi; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 10.  Understanding ligand-receptor non-covalent binding kinetics using molecular modeling.

Authors:  Zhiye Tang; Christopher C Roberts; Chia-En A Chang
Journal:  Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)       Date:  2017-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.