Literature DB >> 25494707

Understanding the role of patient organizations in health technology assessment.

Tiago Moreira1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The involvement of patient representatives in health technology assessment is increasingly seen by policy makers and researchers as key for the deployment of patient-centred health care, but there is uncertainty and a lack of theoretical understanding regarding the knowledge and expertise brought by patient representatives and organisations to HTA processes.
OBJECTIVE: To propose a conceptually-robust typological model of the knowledge and expertise held by patient organisations. DESIGN, DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The study followed a case-study design. Data were collected within an international research project on patient organisations' engagement with knowledge, and included archival and documentary data, in-depth interviews with key members of the organisation and participant observation. Data analysis followed standard procedure of qualitative analysis anchored in an analytic induction approach.
RESULTS: Analysis identified three stages in the history of the patient organisation under analysis - Alzheimer's Society. In a first period, the focus is on 'caring knowledge' and an emphasis on its volunteer membership. In a transition stage, a combination of experiential, clinical and scientific knowledge is proposed in an attempt to expand its field of activism into HTA. In the most recent phase, there is a deepening of its network of associations to secure its role in the production of evidence.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis identified an important relationship between the forms of knowledge deployed by patient organisations and the networks of expertise and policy they mobilise to pursue their activities. A model of this relationship is outlined, for the use of further research and practice on patient involvement.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health technolgy assessment; knowledge networks; patient and public involvement; quality of life in dementia

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25494707      PMCID: PMC5810692          DOI: 10.1111/hex.12325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  10 in total

1.  Citizens, publics, others and their role in participatory processes: a commentary on Lehoux, Daudelin and Abelson.

Authors:  Graham P Martin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Mapping the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment.

Authors:  Pascale Lehoux; Bryn Williams-Jones
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 3.  Belief, knowledge and expertise: the emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology.

Authors:  Lindsay Prior
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2003

4.  Democratizing clinical research.

Authors:  Keith Lloyd; Jo White
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  An international survey of the public engagement practices of health technology assessment organizations.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitty
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  The integration of citizens into a science/policy network in genetics: governance arrangements and asymmetry in expertise.

Authors:  Geneviève Daudelin; Pascale Lehoux; Julia Abelson; Jean L Denis
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 7.  Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation.

Authors:  Karen Facey; Antoine Boivin; Javier Gracia; Helle Ploug Hansen; Alessandra Lo Scalzo; Jean Mossman; Ann Single
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 8.  Introducing patients' and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiences.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Marie Desmartis; Dolorès Lepage-Savary; Johanne Gagnon; Michèle St-Pierre; Marc Rhainds; Renald Lemieux; Francois-Pierre Gauvin; Hugo Pollender; France Légaré
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.188

9.  Advocating voice: organisational, historical and social milieux of the Alzheimer's disease movement.

Authors:  Renée L Beard
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2004-09

10.  Embodied health movements: new approaches to social movements in health.

Authors:  Phil Brown; Stephen Zavestoski; Sabrina McCormick; Brian Mayer; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Rebecca Gasior Altman
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2004-01
  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Decision making in NICE single technological appraisals: How does NICE incorporate patient perspectives?

Authors:  Ferhana Hashem; Michael W Calnan; Patrick R Brown
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Appraising the holistic value of Lenvatinib for radio-iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: A multi-country study applying pragmatic MCDA.

Authors:  Monika Wagner; Hanane Khoury; Liga Bennetts; Patrizia Berto; Jenifer Ehreth; Xavier Badia; Mireille Goetghebeur
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  It's not evidence, it's insight: bringing patients' perspectives into health technology appraisal at NICE.

Authors:  Kristina Staley; Caroline Doherty
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2016-03-24

4.  What do stakeholders expect from patient engagement: Are these expectations being met?

Authors:  Mathieu Boudes; Paul Robinson; Neil Bertelsen; Nicholas Brooke; Anton Hoos; Marc Boutin; Jan Geissler; Ify Sargeant
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Perspectives to mitigate payer uncertainty in health technology assessment of novel oncology drugs.

Authors:  Oriol Solà-Morales; Timm Volmer; Lorenzo Mantovani
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2019-01-22

6.  Patient Organizations' Barriers in Pharmacovigilance and Strategies to Stimulate Their Participation.

Authors:  Katherine Chinchilla; Cristiano Matos; Victoria Hall; Florence van Hunsel
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Supporting patients self-managing respiratory health: a qualitative study on the impact of the Breathe Easy voluntary group network.

Authors:  Ferhana Hashem; Rowena Merritt
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2018-02-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.