Literature DB >> 25494669

Motor imagery: effects of age, task complexity, and task setting.

Michael Kalicinski1, Matthias Kempe, Otmar Bock.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND/STUDY CONTEXT: Mental training may potentially enhance motor performance and self-efficacy in older adults. However, several studies revealed an age-related decay of motor imagery (MI), which suggests that mental training might be too challenging for older adults. Recognizing that laboratory results are often not transferable to real-life situations, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate imagery performance in the elderly with a more real-life-like approach.
METHODS: MI performance of 21 older (70.28 ± 4.65 years) and 19 younger adults (24.89 ± 3.16 years) was estimated by mental chronometry from the first-person perspective. Subjects were asked to walk in a supermarket scenario straight ahead (A), or with two changes of direction (B), or with two changes of direction while retrieving products (C). The three tasks were completed first in the subjects' imagination and then in reality, with time required as the dependent measure. MI ability was also assessed by the Controllability of Motor Imagery (CMI) test, in which subjects are required to mentally assume a sequence of body postures.
RESULTS: Age-related alterations of MI were observed for walking only in Tasks B and C, and only in terms of intersubject variability, not in terms of across-subject means. This is in contrast to earlier studies that used a less realistic walking scenario and found an age-related decay even for MI means. Age-related alterations of CMI were observed as well, but they correlated little with those of walking.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that MI is not a global phenomenon, as it decays in old age independently in the temporal and in the spatial domain, decays less with simple than with complex tasks, and less in an everyday-like than in a typical laboratory setting. These characteristics of MI should be taken into account when assessing its decay in old age, and when designing mental training for the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25494669     DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2015.978202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Aging Res        ISSN: 0361-073X            Impact factor:   1.645


  7 in total

1.  Neuronal mechanisms of motor learning and motor memory consolidation in healthy old adults.

Authors:  K M M Berghuis; M P Veldman; S Solnik; G Koch; I Zijdewind; T Hortobágyi
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-05-09

Review 2.  Motor Imagery during Action Observation: A Brief Review of Evidence, Theory and Future Research Opportunities.

Authors:  Daniel L Eaves; Martin Riach; Paul S Holmes; David J Wright
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Imagery Ability and Imagery Perspective Preference: A Study of Their Relationship and Age- and Gender-Related Changes.

Authors:  Karen P Y Liu; Monica Lai; Shirley S M Fong; Michelle Bissett
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.342

4.  Effects of Motor Imagery Training on Balance and Gait in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

Authors:  Dong Sik Oh; Jong Duk Choi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Brain connectivity during simulated balance in older adults with and without Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Pasman; Martin J McKeown; Saurabh Garg; Taylor W Cleworth; Bastiaan R Bloem; J Timothy Inglis; Mark G Carpenter
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.881

6.  Can a single session of motor imagery promote motor learning of locomotion in older adults? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Vaughan P Nicholson; Justin Wl Keogh; Nancy L Low Choy
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  A different point of view: the evaluation of motor imagery perspectives in patients with sensorimotor impairments in a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Szabina Gäumann; Rahel Sarah Gerber; Zorica Suica; Jasmin Wandel; Corina Schuster-Amft
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 2.474

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.