Literature DB >> 25494327

I just want my research credit: frequency of suboptimal effort in a non-clinical healthy undergraduate sample.

Jonathan DeRight1, Randall S Jorgensen.   

Abstract

Although performance validity testing is becoming fairly routine in clinical settings, research protocols involving neuropsychological tests infrequently include assessments of performance validity. The current study utilized an embedded measure of effort over two administrations of CNS Vital Signs to determine the frequency of poor effort in non-clinical healthy undergraduate students participating in a research study for course credit. Results indicate that more than 1 in 10 college students participating in a cognitive test battery for research showed test scores consistent with inadequate effort, which was associated with poor performance on testing across many domains. This conclusion was supported by poor performance on many other subtests. Healthy college students with suboptimal effort (n = 11) had an overall score in the 15th percentile on average compared to the 48th percentile in the rest of the students (n = 66). Those who failed validity indicators on the baseline administration were more likely to fail validity indicators on the repeat administration. Those who were tested in the morning were also more likely to fail validity indicators. The current study provides evidence for the potential limitations of conducting research using neuropsychological tests with healthy college student volunteers in the absence of performance validity testing. Revised college-level cutoffs are proposed.

Keywords:  College students; Effort testing.; Performance validity testing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25494327     DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2014.989267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1385-4046            Impact factor:   3.535


  10 in total

1.  Predictors and Impact of Self-Reported Suboptimal Effort on Estimates of Prevalence of HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders.

Authors:  Andrew J Levine; Eileen Martin; Ned Sacktor; Cynthia Munro; James Becker
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.731

2.  Levels of Self-representation and Their Sociocognitive Correlates in Late-Diagnosed Autistic Adults.

Authors:  R L Moseley; C H Liu; N J Gregory; P Smith; S Baron-Cohen; J Sui
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-08-30

3.  Prevalence of below-criterion Reliable Digit Span scores in a clinical sample of older adults.

Authors:  RyAnna Zenisek; Scott R Millis; Sarah J Banks; Justin B Miller
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.813

Review 4.  Developing a Cognition Endpoint for Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Noah D Silverberg; Paul K Crane; Kristen Dams-O'Connor; James Holdnack; Brian J Ivins; Rael T Lange; Geoffrey T Manley; Michael McCrea; Grant L Iverson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  A comparison of the self-report patterns of analog versus real-world malingerers of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Allyson G Harrison; Irene T Armstrong
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  The Development of an Embedded Figures Test for the Detection of Feigned Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adulthood.

Authors:  Anselm B M Fuermaier; Oliver Tucha; Janneke Koerts; Meryem Grabski; Klaus W Lange; Matthias Weisbrod; Steffen Aschenbrenner; Lara Tucha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test.

Authors:  Jacob Israelashvili; Lisanne S Pauw; Disa A Sauter; Agneta H Fischer
Journal:  J Intell       Date:  2021-05-07

8.  Gamification of Cognitive Assessment and Cognitive Training: A Systematic Review of Applications and Efficacy.

Authors:  Jim Lumsden; Elizabeth A Edwards; Natalia S Lawrence; David Coyle; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.143

9.  The effects of gamelike features and test location on cognitive test performance and participant enjoyment.

Authors:  Jim Lumsden; Andy Skinner; Andy T Woods; Natalia S Lawrence; Marcus Munafò
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  One step ahead: The perceived kinematics of others' actions are biased toward expected goals.

Authors:  Matthew Hudson; Toby Nicholson; William A Simpson; Rob Ellis; Patric Bach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2015-11-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.