PURPOSE: To determine bacterial eradication using numerous riboflavin concentrations and different ultraviolet light A (UVA) radiant and exposure time in an experimental model. METHODS: Dilutions of Staphylococcus epidermidis were mixed with riboflavin at varying concentrations (0.007–0.09%). Effects on bacterial growth were evaluated after 0, 3, 6, 30 and 60 min of UVA exposure (irradiance 30 and 3 mW/cm2). Standard settings of UVA were compared with high-power UVA approach. Different fluid thicknesses of the exposed dilutions were also examined to improve the model. RESULTS: Bacterial eradication (%) was increased after 60 compared with 30 min of UVA exposure for concentrations of 0.03–0.07% but not for 0.09% riboflavin.There was a significant difference between the efficacy between 0.03 and 0.09% and eradication dropped from 80%to 50%(p = 0.01).A correlation could be calculated for the amount of riboflavin at 60 min of UVA and the ability to kill bacteria(p = 0.01). The antibacterial effect was more pronounced when the tested bacterial suspension thickness was reduced. High-power UVA method was less potent in microbial elimination, eradicating only 60%of bacteria after 6 min versus 97–99%after 60 min in the low-power setting, compared with respective controls (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In these in vitro experiments, a longer UVA exposure time in combination with lower riboflavin levels were found to be favourable in killing bacteria as compared to the standard cross-linking settings. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical relevance of these findings.
PURPOSE: To determine bacterial eradication using numerous riboflavin concentrations and different ultraviolet light A (UVA) radiant and exposure time in an experimental model. METHODS: Dilutions of Staphylococcus epidermidis were mixed with riboflavin at varying concentrations (0.007–0.09%). Effects on bacterial growth were evaluated after 0, 3, 6, 30 and 60 min of UVA exposure (irradiance 30 and 3 mW/cm2). Standard settings of UVA were compared with high-power UVA approach. Different fluid thicknesses of the exposed dilutions were also examined to improve the model. RESULTS: Bacterial eradication (%) was increased after 60 compared with 30 min of UVA exposure for concentrations of 0.03–0.07% but not for 0.09% riboflavin.There was a significant difference between the efficacy between 0.03 and 0.09% and eradication dropped from 80%to 50%(p = 0.01).A correlation could be calculated for the amount of riboflavin at 60 min of UVA and the ability to kill bacteria(p = 0.01). The antibacterial effect was more pronounced when the tested bacterial suspension thickness was reduced. High-power UVA method was less potent in microbial elimination, eradicating only 60%of bacteria after 6 min versus 97–99%after 60 min in the low-power setting, compared with respective controls (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In these in vitro experiments, a longer UVA exposure time in combination with lower riboflavin levels were found to be favourable in killing bacteria as compared to the standard cross-linking settings. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical relevance of these findings.
Authors: Eman A Awad; Mona Abdelkader; Ameera G Abdelhameed; Walid M Gaafar; Tharwat H Mokbel Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-04-18 Impact factor: 1.779
Authors: Anja Suter; Sarah Schmitt; Ella Hübschke; Malwina Kowalska; Sonja Hartnack; Simon Pot Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 2.792