| Literature DB >> 25493198 |
Suwannaporn Boonpeng1, Sunisa Siripongvutikorn2, Chutha Sae-Wong1, Pornpong Sutthirak3.
Abstract
Cadmium (Cd) contamination is a highly dangerous international problem because it can transfer into the food chain and become bioaccumulated, endangering human health. Cd detoxication is very interesting particularly the method providing no undesirable side effects. Cd also causes lipid oxidation that leads to undesired food quality. Garlic (Allium sativum L.) has been used as conventional food and in herbal therapy and folklore medicine as an antibacterial, antitumorogenic, and antioxidant agent for over 5000 years. In the present work, fresh garlic and pickled garlic extracted with distilled water was brought to determine antioxidant activities in terms of 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay, 2,2'-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging assay, ferric reducing ability power (FRAP) assay, chelating activities, superoxide, and hydroxyl scavenging assay. The data showed that pickled garlic extracts significantly possessed more DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, superoxide, and hydroxyl scavenging assays as 11.86, 13.74, 4.9, 46.67, and 15.33 g trolox equivalent/g sample, respectively, compared with fresh one as 7.44, 7.62, 0.01, 4.07, and 8.09 g trolox equivalent/g sample, respectively. However, iron chelating activity of fresh garlic extract was higher than that of pickled garlic while there was no significant difference in the copper chelating activity of both extracts. For anti-Cd properties, pickled garlic was more effective than fresh garlic and contained less toxicity than standard diallyl disulfide (DADS). Therefore, therapeutic properties of pickled garlic favored its consumption compared with fresh and standard DADS for its antioxidant and anti-Cd properties.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-Cd; antioxidant; garlic; pickled garlic
Year: 2014 PMID: 25493198 PMCID: PMC4256585 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Moisture content, water activity, and pH value in fresh and pickled garlic
| Fresh garlic | Pickled garlic | |
|---|---|---|
| Moisture content (%) | 64.37 ± 0.15 | 84.57 ± 0.09 |
| Water activity | 0.99 ± 0.001 | 0.97 ± 0.001 |
| pH value | 6.09 ± 0.05 | 3.89 ± 0.27 |
Each value is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Antioxidant activities of fresh and pickled garlic extracts
| Antioxidant activities | Gram trolox equivalent per gram sample | |
|---|---|---|
| Fresh garlic | Pickled garlic | |
| DPPH | 7.44 ± 0.16b | 11.86 ± 0.14a |
| ABTS | 7.62 ± 0.32b | 13.74 ± 0.14a |
| FRAP | 0.01 ± 0.02b | 4.91 ± 0.05a |
| Superoxide | 4.07 ± 0.50b | 46.67 ± 4.04a |
| Hydroxyl | 8.09 ± 1.00 × 10−3b | 15.33 ± 0.43 × 10−3a |
| Gram EDTA equivalent per gram sample | ||
| Iron chelating | 0.61 ± 0.05a | NDb |
| Copper chelating | 20.44 ± 0.17a | 20.28 ± 0.28a |
Each value is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Means with different superscript letters within a row are significantly different (P < 0.05). ND, not detected.
Figure 1Effect of CdCl2 on cell viability determined using MTT assay.
Figure 2Effect of fresh and pickled garlic extracts and diallyl disulfide (μg/mL) on cell viability.
Figure 3Anti-Cd toxicity properties on HEK293 cells determined using MTT assay. (A) The cells were treated with samples and standard before exposure Cd; (B) the cells were treated with samples, standard, and Cd together; and (C) the cells were exposed to Cd before treated samples and standard; each value is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
| Control | cells + 0, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150 |
| Tested samples | cells + 0, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400 |
| Standard | cells + 0, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400 |