| Literature DB >> 25493192 |
Diego Kingston1, Guido F Novelli1, Patricia Cerrutti1, Matias N Recupero2, Martin Blasco2, Miguel A Galvagno3.
Abstract
The use of agroindustrial wastes not only decreases bioprocesses and disposal costs but also contributes to the upgrading of the residues. An active recombinant methanol-inducible bovine chymosin has been expressed in our laboratory in the yeastKomagataella pastoris, and grape pomace extracts (GRE) were proposed as a convenient C-energy source for the biomass production of the genetically engineered strain. Carbon and nitrogen sources, growth factors, and initial pH conditions were selected by classical methodology; thereafter, growth conditions optimization was performed using statistical designed experiments (DoEs). In the presence of (in g·L(-1)) 67.0 monosaccharides (glucose and fructose) from GRE, 5.0 (NH4)2SO4, and 10.0 sugar cane molasses (CMz), a yield of 20.0 g·L(-1) cell dry weight (CDW) was obtained aerobically after 60 h incubation at 28°C and pH 4.0. Applying a fed-batch strategy with methanol:sorbitol as the enzyme inducers, a chymosin production of 8.53 International Milk Clotting Units (IMCU) per mg protein was obtained in the supernatant. The results presented show that through a statistical design, a simple, cheap, and easy to prepare culture medium could be developed using two agroindustrial derivatives (GRE and CMz) to obtain a higher value added product.Entities:
Keywords: Agroindustrial by-product; Komagataella pastoris biomass; bovine chymosin
Year: 2014 PMID: 25493192 PMCID: PMC4256579 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Box–Behnken optimization design and measured response.
| Trial no. | Factor | Response OD600 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5/(+1) | 10/(+1) | 42/(0) | 26.70 |
| 2 | 2.5/(0) | 5/(0) | 42/(0) | 24.70 |
| 3 | 5/(+1) | 5/(0) | 60/(+1) | 35.60 |
| 4 | 2.5/(0) | 0/(−1) | 24/(−1) | 10.20 |
| 5 | 2.5/(0) | 5/(0) | 42/(0) | 23.20 |
| 6 | 2.5/(0) | 10/(+1) | 60/(+1) | 33.30 |
| 7 | 0/(−1) | 0/(−1) | 42/(0) | 10.50 |
| 8 | 2.5/(0) | 0/(−1) | 60/(+1) | 21.20 |
| 9 | 2.5/(0) | 5/(0) | 42/(0) | 20.50 |
| 10 | 0/(−1) | 5/(0) | 24/(−1) | 12.10 |
| 11 | 0/(−1) | 10/(+1) | 42/(0) | 16.20 |
| 12 | 2.5/(0) | 10/(+1) | 24/(−1) | 13.75 |
| 13 | 5/(+1) | 5/(0) | 24/(−1) | 14.65 |
| 14 | 5/(+1) | 0/(−1) | 42/(0) | 11.40 |
| 15 | 2.5/(0) | 5/(0) | 42/(0) | 24.00 |
| 16 | 0/(−1) | 5/(0) | 60/(+1) | 22.20 |
X1 = (NH4)2SO4 (g·L−1);X2 = CMz (g·L−1);X3 = time (h).
Data represent the average ± SD of three independent experiment.
Numbers between brackets are the coded values of the variables.
Values of maximum specific growth rate (μmax), generation time (T), maximum cell dry weight (CDWmax), and yield CDW/substrate (YCDW/S) forKomagataella pastoris grown in YNB supplemented with different C sources.
| C source | CDWmax (g·L−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycerol (25.0 g·L−1) | 0.202 | 3.4 | 13.1 | 0.42 |
| Glycerol (50.0 g·L−1) | 0.205 | 3.4 | 13.2 | 0.41 |
| Glycerol (100.0 g·L−1) | 0.206 | 3.4 | 14.0 | 0.40 |
| Glycerol from biodiesel (25.0 g·L−1) | 0.190 | 3.6 | 10.4 | 0.41 |
| Glucose (40.0 g·L−1) | 0.265 | 2.6 | 15.8 | 0.40 |
| GRE (37.5 g·L−1) | 0.149 | 4.7 | 14.8 | 0.39 |
GRE, grape pomace extracts.
Figure 1Effect of growth ofKomagataella pastoris in GRE (A) with different N source: GRE without supplementation; GRE + meat peptone, GRE + tryptone; GRE + (NH4)2SO4; GRE + corn steep liquor; GRE + urea; (B) growth factors addition: GRE without supplements; GRE + yeast extract; GRE + cane molasses; GRE + biotin; (C) at different pH values. pH = 3, pH = 4, pH = 5, pH = 6. GRE, grape pomace extracts.
Figure 2Surface plot for biomass production expressed as a function of (NH4)2SO4 and yeast extract (YE) concentrations for the PBSD screening, at level = 0 for the other variables. PBSD, Plackett–Burman screening designs.
Statistical analysis of the optimization design for biomass production ofKomagataella pastoris.
| Coefficient | Value | SE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.897 | 5.271 | 0.185 | 1.498 | |
| 0.026 | 1.092 | 0.982 | 0.024 | |
| 1.124 | 0.546 | 0.085 | 2.059 | |
| −0.030 | 0.226 | 0.900 | −0.131 | |
| − | − | |||
| − | − | |||
| x3 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.413 | 0.879 |
x1 = (NH4)2SO4;x2 = CMz;x3 = time.
TheP values for regression coefficients in bold characters are significant atP < 0.05.
Figure 3Response surface plot showing the effect of cane molasses (CMz) and (NH4)2SO4 concentrations at 60-h incubation time (+1) on biomass production ofKomagataella pastoris.Inset: predicted versus experimental values for biomass expressed as OD600nm units. The solid line depicted representsy = x.