Literature DB >> 25492488

Comparison of apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite using 4 different root canal irrigation techniques.

Emre İriboz1, Koral Bayraktar2, Dilek Türkaydın2, Bilge Tarçın2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We compared the apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite delivered with a 27-G needle, self-adjusting file (SAF), passive ultrasonic irrigation, or the EndoVac system (SybronEndo, Orange, CA) during the instrumentation and final irrigation of root canals.
METHODS: Matched paired single-canal teeth were divided into 8 groups. The experimental groups were needle irrigation size #30 (NI30) and #50 (NI50), SAF size #30 (SAF30) and #50 (SAF50), passive ultrasonic irrigation size #30 (PUI30) and #50 (PUI50), and EndoVac size #30 (EV30) and #50 (EV50). Teeth were embedded in 0.2% agarose gel (pH = 7.4) containing 1 mL 0.1% m-Cresol purple (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), which changes color at a pH level of 9.0. Root canals were irrigated with sodium hypochlorite and EDTA using 4 different techniques, and the amount of irrigant was controlled. Standardized digital photographs were taken 20 minutes after the first irrigant was used and were analyzed to determine the amount of extrusion (expressed as a percentage of total pixels).
RESULTS: The amounts of apical extrusion obtained in the NI30, NI50, SAF30, SAF50, PUI30, PUI50, EV30, and EV50 groups were 30% (3/10), 50% (5/10), 20% (2/10), 70% (7/10), 40% (4/10), 40% (4/10), 10% (1/10), and 10% (1/10), respectively. The overall extrusion frequency, regardless of the apical preparation size, was 40% (8/20) for needle, 45% (9/20) for SAF, 40% (8/20) for ultrasonic irrigation, and 10% (2/20) for EndoVac. Although the SAF group showed more extrusion, the percentage of pixels was significantly higher in the needle irrigation group (P < .01). The EndoVac group showed significantly lower extrusion values than the other techniques in terms of the number of teeth and pixels (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of apical extrusion is significantly lower with the EndoVac in comparison with the 3 other techniques.
Copyright © 2015 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apical extrusion; EndoVac; irrigation; passive ultrasonic irrigation; self-adjusting file

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25492488     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of sodium hypochlorite extrusion by five irrigation systems using an artificial root socket model and a quantitative chemical method.

Authors:  Adham A Azim; Hacer Aksel; M Margaret Jefferson; George T-J Huang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Use of electromagnetic stimulation on an Enterococcus faecalis biofilm on root canal treated teeth in vitro.

Authors:  Beatriz H D Panariello; Justin K Kindler; Kenneth J Spolnik; Ygal Ehrlich; George J Eckert; Simone Duarte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Shaping ability and apical debris extrusion after root canal preparation with rotary or reciprocating instruments: a micro-CT study.

Authors:  Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da Silva; Sara Gomes de Moura; Carolina Oliveira de Lima; Ana Flávia Almeida Barbosa; Waleska Florentino Misael; Mariane Floriano Lopes Santos Lacerda; Luciana Moura Sassone
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2021-02-25

4.  Apical Negative Pressure irrigation presents tissue compatibility in immature teeth.

Authors:  Carolina Maschietto Pucinelli; Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva; Nestor Cohenca; Priscilla Coutinho Romualdo; Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva; Alberto Consolaro; Alexandra Mussolino de Queiroz; Paulo Nelson
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.