Literature DB >> 25492411

Corifollitropin alfa compared with follitropin beta in poor responders undergoing ICSI: a randomized controlled trial.

E M Kolibianakis1, C A Venetis2, J K Bosdou3, L Zepiridis3, K Chatzimeletiou3, A Makedos3, S Masouridou3, S Triantafillidis3, A Mitsoli3, B C Tarlatzis3.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Does substituting 150 µg corifollitropin alfa for 450 IU follitropin beta during the first 7 days of ovarian stimulation in proven poor responders, result in retrieval of a non-inferior number (<1.5 fewer) of cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs)? SUMMARY ANSWER: A single s.c. dose of 150 µg corifollitropin alfa on the first day of ovarian stimulation, followed if necessary, from Day 8 onwards, with 450 IU of follitropin beta/day, is not inferior to daily doses of 450 IU follitropin beta. The 95% CI of the difference between medians in the number of oocytes retrieved was -1 to +1 within the safety margin of 1.5. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Recent data from retrospective studies suggest that the use of corifollitropin alfa in poor responders is promising since it could simplify ovarian stimulation without compromising its outcome. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Seventy-nine women with previous poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI treatment were enrolled in this open label, non-inferiority, randomized clinical trial (RCT). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Inclusion criteria were: previous poor response to ovarian stimulation (≤4 COCs) after maximal stimulation, age <45 years, regular spontaneous menstrual cycle, body mass index: 18-32 kg/m(2) and basal follicle stimulating hormone ≤20 IU/l. On Day 2 of the menstrual cycle, patients were administered either a single s.c dose of 150 µg corifollitropin alfa (n = 40) or a fixed daily dose of 450 IU of follitropin beta (n = 39). In the corifollitropin alfa group, 450 IU of follitropin beta were administered from Day 8 of stimulation until the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration, if necessary. To inhibit premature luteinizing hormone surge, the gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix was used. Triggering of final oocyte maturation was performed using 250 µg of recombinant hCG, when at least two follicles reached 17 mm in mean diameter. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The number of COCs retrieved was not statistically different between the corifollitropin alfa and the follitropin beta groups [Median 3 versus 2, 95% CI 2-4, 2-3, respectively, P = 0.26]. The 95% CI of the difference between medians in the number of oocytes retrieved was -1 to +1. A multivariable analysis adjusting for all the potential baseline differences confirmed this finding. No significant difference was observed regarding the probability of live birth between the corifollitropin alfa and the follitropin beta group (live birth per patient reaching oocyte retrieval: 7.9 versus 2.6%, respectively, difference +5.3%, 95% CI: -6.8 to +18.3). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The present study was not powered to test a smaller difference (e.g. 1 COC) in terms of COCs retrieved as well as to show potential differences in the probability of pregnancy. Moreover, it would be interesting to assess whether the continuation of stimulation in the long acting FSH arm, where necessary, with 200 IU instead of 450 IU of follitropin beta would have altered the direction or the magnitude of the effect of the type of FSH, observed on the number of COCs retrieved. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Corifollitropin alfa simplifies IVF treatment because it is administered in a GnRH antagonist protocol and replaces seven daily FSH injections with a single one of a long acting FSH without compromising the outcome. It could greatly reduce the burden of treatment for poor responders and this deserves further investigation.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corifollitropin alfa; follitropin beta; in vitro fertilization; poor ovarian response; recombinant FSH

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25492411     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  Mild Versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation for Poor Responders Undergoing IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Charalampos Siristatidis; George Salamalekis; Konstantinos Dafopoulos; George Basios; Paraskevi Vogiatzi; Nikolaos Papantoniou
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Corifollitropin alfa compared to daily FSH in controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefania Fensore; Marco Di Marzio; Gian Mario Tiboni
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.234

3.  Corifollitropin alfa compared to daily rFSH or HP-HMG in GnRH antagonist controlled ovarian stimulation protocol for patients undergoing assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Priscila Morais Galvão Souza; Bruno Ramalho de Carvalho; Hitomi Miura Nakagawa; Thalita Reis Esselin Rassi; Antônio César Paes Barbosa; Adelino Amaral Silva
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2017-06-01

4.  Effectiveness of corifollitropin alfa used for ovarian stimulation of poor responder patients.

Authors:  Helmy Selman; Leonardo Rinaldi
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2016-10-17

5.  Corifollitropin- α compared to daily r-FSH in for patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Clinical trial study.

Authors:  Ziba Zahiri Sorouri; Davoud Pourmarzi; Niloufar Safar Khah
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2019-03-03

6.  Evaluation of Protocols of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Obtaining Mature Oocytes (MII): Retrospective Study on Assisted Reproductive Technology Procedures.

Authors:  Cátia Manuela Ribeiro Barbosa Martins; Patrícia Cordeiro Pires de Figueiredo Gomes Crisóstomo Ruivo; Denise Cristina Mós Vaz-Oliani; Renato Alessandre Silva Martins; Antonio Helio Oliani
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2022-08-04

Review 7.  The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to Treatment.

Authors:  Polina Giannelou; Mara Simopoulou; Sokratis Grigoriadis; Evangelos Makrakis; Adamantia Kontogeorgi; Agni Pantou; Dionysios Galatis; Theodoros Kalampokas; Panagiotis Bakas; Stamatis Bolaris; Konstantinos Pantos; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.