OBJECTIVE: To investigate the joint association of adiposity, physical activity, sedentary leisure time and job intensity on diabetes and impaired glycoregulation. METHODS: Data was from the 2010 Zhejiang survey and 17 437 adults ( ≥18 years) were examined. Logistic regression was used in this cross-sectional study. RESULTS: Under the same level of sedentary leisure time, adiposity anticipants showed an OR of 2.52-2.75 times for people with diabetes than those with normal or underweight BMI, and anticipants with highest WC having an OR of 2.09-3.71 times than those with the lowest WC. With the same level of physical activity, those adiposity anticipants had an OR of 2.19-5.98 times for diabetes than those with normal or underweight BMI, and anticipants with the highest WC had an OR of 3.10-6.25 times than those with the lowest WC. Anticipants who had no physical activity but with adiposity. BMI had an OR of 3.21 times than those with normal or underweight BMI, but there was no significant difference between diabetes and BMI in those that practising physical activities. Within the 3 levels of physical activity, participants that practising no physical activity, had an OR of 1.68-4.23 times for diabetes than those who were physically active when WC was used as a measure for adiposity. CONCLUSION: Controlling weight and waist seemed more important than improving physical activity or reducing sedentary leisure time in the prevention program on diabetes. WC was better measure on the risks for adiposity-related diabetes than BMI, especially when physical activity was under consideration.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the joint association of adiposity, physical activity, sedentary leisure time and job intensity on diabetes and impaired glycoregulation. METHODS: Data was from the 2010 Zhejiang survey and 17 437 adults ( ≥18 years) were examined. Logistic regression was used in this cross-sectional study. RESULTS: Under the same level of sedentary leisure time, adiposity anticipants showed an OR of 2.52-2.75 times for people with diabetes than those with normal or underweight BMI, and anticipants with highest WC having an OR of 2.09-3.71 times than those with the lowest WC. With the same level of physical activity, those adiposity anticipants had an OR of 2.19-5.98 times for diabetes than those with normal or underweight BMI, and anticipants with the highest WC had an OR of 3.10-6.25 times than those with the lowest WC. Anticipants who had no physical activity but with adiposity. BMI had an OR of 3.21 times than those with normal or underweight BMI, but there was no significant difference between diabetes and BMI in those that practising physical activities. Within the 3 levels of physical activity, participants that practising no physical activity, had an OR of 1.68-4.23 times for diabetes than those who were physically active when WC was used as a measure for adiposity. CONCLUSION: Controlling weight and waist seemed more important than improving physical activity or reducing sedentary leisure time in the prevention program on diabetes. WC was better measure on the risks for adiposity-related diabetes than BMI, especially when physical activity was under consideration.