Literature DB >> 25492085

MET amplification status in therapy-naïve adeno- and squamous cell carcinomas of the lung.

Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus1, Anne M Schultheis2, Josef Rüschoff3, Elke Binot2, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse2, Jana Fassunke2, Wolfgang Schulte4, Yon-Dschun Ko5, Andreas Schlesinger6, Marc Bos7, Masyar Gardizi7, Walburga Engel-Riedel8, Michael Brockmann9, Monika Serke10, Ulrich Gerigk4, Khosro Hekmat11, Konrad F Frank12, Marcel Reiser13, Holger Schulz14, Stefan Krüger15, Erich Stoelben8, Thomas Zander16, Jürgen Wolf7, Reinhard Buettner17.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: MET is a potential therapeutic target in lung cancer and both MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies have entered clinical trials. MET signaling can be activated by various mechanisms, including gene amplification. In this study, we aimed to investigate MET amplification status in adeno- and squamous cell carcinomas of the lung. We propose clearly defined amplification scores and provide epidemiologic data on MET amplification in lung cancer. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We evaluated the prevalence of increased MET gene copy numbers in 693 treatment-naïve cancers by FISH, defined clear cutoff criteria, and correlated FISH results to MET IHC.
RESULTS: Two thirds (67%) of lung cancers do not have gains in MET gene copy numbers, whereas 3% show a clear-cut high-level amplification (MET/centromer7 ratio ≥2.0 or average gene copy number per nucleus ≥6.0 or ≥10% of tumor cells containing ≥15 MET copies). The remaining cases can be subdivided into intermediate- (6%) and low-level gains (24%). Importantly, MET amplifications occur at equal frequencies in squamous and adenocarcinomas without or with EGFR or KRAS mutations.
CONCLUSION: MET amplification is not a mutually exclusive genetic event in therapy-naïve non-small cell lung cancer. Our data suggest that it might be useful to determine MET amplification (i) before EGFR inhibitor treatment to identify possible primary resistance to anti-EGFR treatment, and (ii) to select cases that harbor KRAS mutations additionally to MET amplification and, thus, may not benefit from MET inhibition. Furthermore, our study provides comprehensive epidemiologic data for upcoming trials with various MET inhibitors. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25492085     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  48 in total

1.  [Minutes of the meeting of the working group on bone, joint and soft tissue pathology: Congress of the German Society of Pathology on 31 May 2015].

Authors:  S Scheil-Bertram; V Krenn; K Hauptmann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Molecular and Histological Changes in Post-Treatment Biopsies of Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  S Vatrano; L Righi; T Vavalá; I Rapa; M Busso; S Izzo; S Cappia; A Veltri; M Papotti; G V Scagliotti; S Novello
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 3.  Lung cancer as a paradigm for precision oncology in solid tumours.

Authors:  Simon Schallenberg; Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse; Reinhard Buettner
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Prognostic and predictive value of MET deregulation in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Giovanna Finocchiaro; Luca Toschi; Letizia Gianoncelli; Marina Baretti; Armando Santoro
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-04

5.  Has MET met its match?

Authors:  Alain Borczuk; Daniel Paucar; Balazs Halmos
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-03

Review 6.  The multiple paths towards MET receptor addiction in cancer.

Authors:  Leslie Duplaquet; Zoulika Kherrouche; Simon Baldacci; Philippe Jamme; Alexis B Cortot; Marie-Christine Copin; David Tulasne
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  MET-GRB2 Signaling-Associated Complexes Correlate with Oncogenic MET Signaling and Sensitivity to MET Kinase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Matthew A Smith; Thomas Licata; Aliya Lakhani; Marileila Varella Garcia; Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus; Vincent Vuaroqueaux; Balazs Halmos; Alain C Borczuk; Y Ann Chen; Benjamin C Creelan; Theresa A Boyle; Eric B Haura
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Identifying the Appropriate FISH Criteria for Defining MET Copy Number-Driven Lung Adenocarcinoma through Oncogene Overlap Analysis.

Authors:  Sinéad A Noonan; Lynne Berry; Xian Lu; Dexiang Gao; Anna E Barón; Patrick Chesnut; Jamie Sheren; Dara L Aisner; Dan Merrick; Robert C Doebele; Marileila Varella-Garcia; D Ross Camidge
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  Heterogeneity and mutation in KRAS and associated oncogenes: evaluating the potential for the evolution of resistance to targeting of KRAS G12C.

Authors:  Vincent L Cannataro; Stephen G Gaffney; Carly Stender; Zi-Ming Zhao; Mark Philips; Andrew E Greenstein; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Whole-exome sequencing identifies key mutated genes in T790M wildtype/cMET-unamplified lung adenocarcinoma with acquired resistance to first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Chenguang Li; Hailin Liu; Bin Zhang; Liqun Gong; Yanjun Su; Zhenfa Zhang; Changli Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.