Literature DB >> 2549208

Vagal afferent modulation of spinal nociceptive transmission in the rat.

K Ren1, A Randich, G F Gebhart.   

Abstract

1. The effects of vagal afferent stimulation (VAS) on spinal nociceptive transmission and the spinal pathway(s) mediating VAS-produced effects were examined in pentobarbital sodium- and urethane-anesthetized, paralyzed rats. The 60 units studied responded to mechanical stimuli and noxious heating (50 degrees C) of cutaneous receptive fields confined to the glabrous skin of the toes and footpads. Recording sites were located in laminae I-VI of the L3-L5 spinal segments. 2. VAS facilitated and inhibited neuronal responses to heat. In pentobarbital-anesthetized rats, responses of most (24/44) units were facilitated by low and inhibited by higher intensities of VAS. Responses of some units (15/44) were only inhibited and others (4/44) only facilitated by VAS. Inhibition produced by VAS was intensity-, pulse width-, frequency-, and stimulation duration-dependent. In urethane-anesthetized rats, responses of 6/16 units were initially facilitated, then inhibited as the intensity of VAS was increased; responses of nine units were inhibited by VAS. Quantitative comparisons of recruitment indices, mean thresholds for inhibition and mean intensities to inhibit unit responses to heat to 50% of control revealed no significant differences between the two anesthetic conditions. 3. The effects of VAS on neuronal responses to heat were dissociable from its effect on blood pressure. Regardless of the effect of VAS on unit responses to noxious heat, VAS consistently produced intensity-dependent depressor responses. The latencies to onset of inhibition and facilitation by VAS were determined by a cumulative sum technique and bin-by-bin analysis of peristimulus time histograms. The apparent latencies were 91 +/- 11 (SE) ms for inhibition and 278 +/- 59 ms for facilitation, both of which occurred before changes in blood pressure. Finally, microinjections of lidocaine into the ventrolateral funiculus (VLF) or transections of the dorsolateral funiculus (DLF) of the thoracic spinal cord attenuated VAS-produced effects on neuronal responses, but did not affect VAS-induced depressor responses. 4. The responses of 11 dorsal horn units to graded noxious heating of the skin were studied; the stimulus-response functions (SRF) were linear and monotonic throughout the temperature range examined (42-52 degrees C). VAS at intensities which inhibited unit responses to heat significantly decreased the slope of the SRF. VAS at intensities which facilitated unit responses to heat produced a leftward, parallel shift of the SRF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2549208     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1989.62.2.401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  10 in total

1.  Effect of amniotic-fluid ingestion on vaginal-cervical-stimulation-induced Fos expression in female rats during estrus.

Authors:  Robert F Hoey; Seth W Hurley; Derek Daniels; Mark B Kristal
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Comparison of intensity-dependent inhibition of spinal wide-dynamic range neurons by dorsal column and peripheral nerve stimulation in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  F Yang; Q Xu; Y-K Cheong; R Shechter; A Sdrulla; S-Q He; V Tiwari; X Dong; P W Wacnik; R Meyer; S N Raja; Y Guan
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.931

3.  Pelvic nerve input mediates descending modulation of homovisceral processing in the thoracolumbar spinal cord of the rat.

Authors:  Gexin Wang; Bin Tang; Richard J Traub
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Evoked pain analgesia in chronic pelvic pain patients using respiratory-gated auricular vagal afferent nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Vitaly Napadow; Robert R Edwards; Christine M Cahalan; George Mensing; Seth Greenbaum; Assia Valovska; Ang Li; Jieun Kim; Yumi Maeda; Kyungmo Park; Ajay D Wasan
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 5.  Current Approaches to Neuromodulation in Primary Headaches: Focus on Vagal Nerve and Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation.

Authors:  Francesca Puledda; Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2016-07

6.  Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for the acute treatment of episodic and chronic cluster headache: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled ACT2 study.

Authors:  Peter J Goadsby; Ilse F de Coo; Nicholas Silver; Alok Tyagi; Fayyaz Ahmed; Charly Gaul; Rigmor H Jensen; Hans-Christoph Diener; Kasia Solbach; Andreas Straube; Eric Liebler; Juana Ca Marin; Michel D Ferrari
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 6.292

7.  Vagus nerve stimulation for primary headache disorders: An anatomical review to explain a clinical phenomenon.

Authors:  Dylan Jozef Hendrik Augustinus Henssen; Berend Derks; Mats van Doorn; Niels Verhoogt; Anne-Marie Van Cappellen van Walsum; Peter Staats; Kris Vissers
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 6.292

8.  The Evolution of Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Forward-Looking Perspectives.

Authors:  Michael A Fishman; Ajay Antony; Michael Esposito; Timothy Deer; Robert Levy
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  Neuromodulation of chronic headaches: position statement from the European Headache Federation.

Authors:  Paolo Martelletti; Rigmor H Jensen; Andrea Antal; Roberto Arcioni; Filippo Brighina; Marina de Tommaso; Angelo Franzini; Denys Fontaine; Max Heiland; Tim P Jürgens; Massimo Leone; Delphine Magis; Koen Paemeleire; Stefano Palmisani; Walter Paulus; Arne May
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 10.  Understanding diverse TRPV1 signaling - an update.

Authors:  Michael C. Andresen
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-11-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.