Literature DB >> 25491887

Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a cost analysis.

Haley E Mansfield1, W Jeffrey Canar, Carter S Gerard, John E O'Toole.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Patients suffering from cervical radiculopathy in whom a course of nonoperative treatment has failed are often candidates for a single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF). The objective of this analysis was to identify any significant cost differences between these surgical methods by comparing direct costs to the hospital. Furthermore, patient-specific characteristics were also considered for their effect on component costs.
METHODS: After obtaining approval from the medical center institutional review board, the authors conducted a retrospective cross-sectional comparative cohort study, with a sample of 101 patients diagnosed with cervical radiculopathy and who underwent an initial single-level ACDF or minimally invasive PCF during a 3-year period. Using these data, bivariate analyses were conducted to determine significant differences in direct total procedure and component costs between surgical techniques. Factorial ANOVAs were also conducted to determine any relationship between patient sex and smoking status to the component costs per surgery.
RESULTS: The mean total direct cost for an ACDF was $8192, and the mean total direct cost for a PCF was $4320. There were significant differences in the cost components for direct costs and operating room supply costs. It was found that there was no statistically significant difference in component costs with regard to patient sex or smoking status.
CONCLUSIONS: In the management of single-level cervical radiculopathy, the present analysis has revealed that the average cost of an ACDF is 89% more than a PCF. This increased cost is largely due to the cost of surgical implants. These results do not appear to be dependent on patient sex or smoking status. When combined with results from previous studies highlighting the comparable patient outcomes for either procedure, the authors' findings suggest that from a health care economics standpoint, physicians should consider a minimally invasive PCF in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; BMI = body mass index; LOS = length of stay; PCF = posterior cervical foraminotomy; anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; cervical radiculopathy; minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25491887     DOI: 10.3171/2014.8.FOCUS14373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  19 in total

1.  Minimally invasive fully endoscopic two-level posterior cervical foraminotomy: technical note.

Authors:  Ralf Wagner; Albert E Telfeian; Menno Iprenburg; Guntram Krzok
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

Review 2.  Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy for treatment of radiculopathy : An effective, time-tested, and cost-efficient motion-preservation technique.

Authors:  L Papavero; R Kothe
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 3.  Fully endoscopic cervical spine surgery: What does the future hold?

Authors:  R Misra; N K Rath
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-09-24

Review 4.  Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical radiculopathy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Zou; Ping-Chuan Wang; Hao Chen; Xin-Min Feng; Hui-Hui Sun
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 5.  Cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Sravisht Iyer; Han Jo Kim
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

Review 6.  Jingtong Granule: A Chinese Patent Medicine for Cervical Radiculopathy.

Authors:  Liguo Zhu; Jinghua Gao; Jie Yu; Minshan Feng; Jinyu Li; Shangquan Wang; Xu Wei
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  Preservation of Motion at the Surgical Level after Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy.

Authors:  Young-Seok Lee; Young-Baeg Kim; Seung-Won Park; Dong-Ho Kang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2017-07-31

8.  Risk and Cost of Reoperation After Single-Level Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A Large Database Study.

Authors:  Arash J Sayari; Alexander Tuchman; Jeremiah R Cohen; Patrick C Hsieh; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-06

9.  Study protocol for a randomised controlled multicentre study: the Foraminotomy ACDF Cost-Effectiveness Trial (FACET) in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  A E H Broekema; J M A Kuijlen; G A T Lesman-Leegte; R H M A Bartels; A D I van Asselt; P C A J Vroomen; J M C van Dijk; M F Reneman; R Soer; R J M Groen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Cervical disc hernia operations through posterior laminoforaminotomy.

Authors:  Coskun Yolas; Nuriye Guzin Ozdemir; Hilmi Onder Okay; Ayhan Kanat; Mehmet Senol; Ibrahim Burak Atci; Hakan Yilmaz; Mustafa Kemal Coban; Mehmet Onur Yuksel; Umit Kahraman
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.