Literature DB >> 25491825

Effect of crown-to-implant ratio on peri-implant stress: a finite element analysis.

Fellippo Ramos Verri1, Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista2, Joel Ferreira Santiago2, Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida2, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate stress distribution in the fixation screws and bone tissue around implants in single-implant supported prostheses with crowns of different heights (10, 12.5, 15 mm - crown-to-implant ratio 1:1, 1.25:1, 1.5:1, respectively). It was designed using three 3-D models. Each model was developed with a mandibular segment of bone block including an internal hexagon implant supporting a screw-retained, single metal-ceramic crown. The crown height was set at 10, 12.5, and 15 mm with crown-to-implant ratio of 1:1, 1.25:1, 1.5:1, respectively. The applied forces were 200N (axial) and 100 N (oblique). The increase of crown height showed differences with the oblique load in some situations. By von Mises' criterion, a high stress area was concentrated at the implant/fixation screw and abutment/implant interfaces at crown-to-implant ratio of 1:1, 1.25:1, 1.5:1, respectively. Using the maximum principal criteria, the buccal regions showed higher traction stress intensity, whereas the distal regions showed the largest compressive stress in all models. The increase of C/I ratio must be carefully evaluated by the dentist since the increase of this C/I ratio is proportional to the increase of average stress for both screw fixation (C/I 1:1 to 1:1.25 ratio=30.1% and C/I 1:1 to 1:1.5 ratio=46.3%) and bone tissue (C/I 1:1 to 1:1.25 ratio=30% and C/I 1:1 to 1:1.5 ratio=51.5%).
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Dental implants; Dental prosthesis; Finite element analysis; Implant-supported

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25491825     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  6 in total

Review 1.  Finite element analysis: A boon to dentistry.

Authors:  Shilpa Trivedi
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2014-12-04

2.  Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Single Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Bone Anchorages.

Authors:  Fellippo Ramos Verri; Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior; Daniel Augusto de Faria Almeida; Ana Caroline Gonçales Verri; Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista; Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos; Pedro Yoshito Noritomi; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-08-13

3.  Finite Element Analysis of Bone Stress around Micro-Implants of Different Diameters and Lengths with Application of a Single or Composite Torque Force.

Authors:  Ying-juan Lu; Shao-hai Chang; Jian-tao Ye; Yu-shan Ye; Yan-song Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Short implants (≤6 mm) versus longer implants with sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qi Yan; Xinyu Wu; Meiying Su; Fang Hua; Bin Shi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Principles of biomechanics in oral implantology.

Authors:  Avram Manea; Simion Bran; Cristian Dinu; Horatiu Rotaru; Ioan Barbur; Bogdan Crisan; Gabriel Armencea; Florin Onisor; Madalina Lazar; Daniel Ostas; Mihaela Baciut; Sergiu Vacaras; Ileana Mitre; Liana Crisan; Ovidiu Muresan; Rares Roman; Grigore Baciut
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2019-12-15

6.  Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible.

Authors:  Lana Zupancic Cepic; Martin Frank; Andreas Reisinger; Dieter Pahr; Werner Zechner; Andreas Schedle
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-02-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.