Literature DB >> 25491804

Comparison of three calcium phosphate bone graft substitutes from biomechanical, histological, and crystallographic perspectives using a rat posterolateral lumbar fusion model.

Ming-Hsien Hu1, Pei-Yuan Lee2, Wen-Cheng Chen3, Jin-Jia Hu4.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of three calcium phosphate bone graft substitutes with different chemical compositions on spinal fusion using a rat posterolateral lumbar fusion model. Specifically, two recently developed non-dispersive tetracalcium phosphate/dicalcium phosphate anhydrous-based calcium phosphate cements (CPCs), namely a CPC consisting of equimolar amounts of the two compounds (nd-CPC) and a CPC consisting of a two-fold greater amount of dicalcium phosphate anhydrous (DCP-rich CPC), were compared with a commercial calcium phosphate bone graft (c-CPG) consisting of hydroxyapatite (60%) and β-tricalcium phosphate (40%). Single-level posterolateral lumbar fusion was performed at the L4-L5 vertebrae in fifteen adult rats (n=5 for each group). Spinal fusion was evaluated with radiographs, manual palpation, mechanical testing, micro-CT, and histology 8 weeks post-surgery. In particular, the crystallographic phases in the three substitutes were identified before and 8 weeks after their implantation. Manual palpation revealed stable constructs in nearly all of the spine specimens. The stiffness and bending load of fused spines in the two CPC groups were comparable to those in the c-CPG group. The radiographs specifically revealed implant resorption and bone remodeling in the DCP-rich CPC group. Analysis of 3D micro-CT images revealed that the bone volume ratio in the DCP-rich CPC group was significantly greater than those in the nd-CPC and c-CPG groups. Histology showed that the DCP-rich CPC group exhibited the highest degree of bone regeneration and osseointegration. Notably, DCP-rich CPC led to a pronounced phase transformation, generating the greatest amount of poorly crystalline apatite among the three groups, which together with adequate resorption may explain the aforementioned positive findings. We therefore conclude that of the bone graft substitutes considered, DCP-rich CPC has the greatest potential to be used in spinal fusion.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioresorption; Calcium phosphate cements; Histology; Posterolateral lumbar fusion; Spinal fusion; Surface treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25491804     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.08.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  3 in total

1.  Incorporation of Collagen in Calcium Phosphate Cements for Controlling Osseointegration.

Authors:  Ming-Hsien Hu; Pei-Yuan Lee; Wen-Cheng Chen; Jin-Jia Hu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-06       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  A novel tissue-engineered bone graft composed of silicon-substituted calcium phosphate, autogenous fine particulate bone powder and BMSCs promotes posterolateral spinal fusion in rabbits.

Authors:  LiHuang Cui; ShouYang Xiang; DeChun Chen; Rui Fu; Xin Zhang; JingTao Chen; XinTao Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Enhanced bioactivity and osteoinductivity of carboxymethyl chitosan/nanohydroxyapatite/graphene oxide nanocomposites.

Authors:  Zhang Yu; Caiwen Xiao; Yazhuo Huang; Mingjiao Chen; Wei Wei; Xiaoxuan Yang; Huifang Zhou; Xiaoping Bi; Linna Lu; Jing Ruan; Xianqun Fan
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.361

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.