| Literature DB >> 25491303 |
Rong Zhao1,2, Ni-Nan Chen3, Xiao-Wei Zhou4, Ping Miao5, Chao-Ying Hu6, Liu Qian7, Qi-Wen Yu8, Ji-Ying Zhang9, Hong Nie10, Xue-hua Chen11, Pu Li12, Rong Xu13, Lian-Bo Xiao14, Xin Zhang15, Jian-Ren Liu16, Dong-Qing Zhang17.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although a variety of drugs have been used to treat the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), none of them are able to cure the disease. Interferon β (IFN-β) has pleiotropic effects on RA, but whether it can be used to treat RA remains globally controversial. Thus, in this study we tested the effects of IFN-β on RA patients and on collagen antibody-induced arthritis (CAIA) model mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25491303 PMCID: PMC4273316 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-014-0330-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Figure 1The expression of inflammatory factors in the serum and SF of RA patients. The levels of IFN-γ (A) and IL-17 (B) in the RA SF were compared with that in RA serum and OA SF. The levels of MMP-3 (C) and TIMP-1 (D) in the serum and SF of RA patients were assessed. The levels of RANKL in RA serum (E) and SF (F) were compared with those in OA serum and SF. *: P <0.05, **: P <0.01.
The fraction of samples positive for CII IgA, IgG, and IgM in RA and OA serum and SF
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| RA Serum (n = 22) | 6/16 | 4/18 | 3/19 |
| OA Serum (n = 6) | 2/4 | 2/4 | 2/4 |
| RA SF (n = 21) | 15/6* | 8/13 | 12/9 |
| OA SF (n = 5) | 0/5* | 0/5 | 1/4 |
CII: collagen II; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; OA: osteoarthritis; SF: synovial fluid. *: P <0.05.
The fraction of samples positive for RF-IgM, Anti-CCP, and GPI in RA and OA serum
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| RA serum (n = 22) | 17/5* | 15/7** | 14/8** |
| OA serum (n = 13) | 4/9* | 0/13** | 2/11** |
RF-IgM: rheumatoid factor-IgM; Anti-CCP: anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody; GPI: glucose-6-phosphate isomerase antibodies; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; OA: osteoarthritis. *: P <0.05, **: P <0.01.
Figure 2Cytokine patterns before and after IFN-β treatment in RA serum and SF. Serum and SF levels of IFN-γ (A), IL-17 (B), MMP-3 (C), TIMP-1 (D), OPG (E), and RANKL (F) in RA patients before and after IFN-β administration. *: P <0.05.
Figure 3Endogenous IFN-β expression and the effect of IFN-β treatment on CAIA model mice. The endogenous expression of IFN-β in the CAIA mice and normal control mice groups (A). Photographs of example hind-paws (B), arthritis scores (C), and the morbidity of arthritis (D) in the IFN-β intervention and non-intervention groups. *: P <0.05.
Figure 4Effects of exogenous IFN-β treatment on the inflammation and cartilage destruction in CAIA model mice. The inflammatory cellular infiltration score (A), cartilage injury (B), and the levels of MMP-3 (C) and TIMP-1 (D) in the IFN-β intervention and non-intervention groups *: P <0.05.
Figure 5Effect of exogenous IFN-β administration on the destruction of joint bones. Ankle joint destruction (A), TRAP mRNA level (B), TRAP staining of joints (C), and the number of TRAP-positive multi-nucleated (≥3 nuclei) cells (D) in the IFN-β intervention and non-intervention groups. *: P <0.05.
Figure 6Changes in the RANKL-RANK signaling pathway after exogenous IFN-β treatment in the CAIA model mice. The levels of RANKL (A), TRAF6 (B), c-Fos (C), and NFATc-1 (D) in the joints of mice in the IFN-β intervention and non-intervention groups. *: P <0.05.
Figure 7Effects of exogenous IFN-β administration on RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis. TRAP staining (A) and the number of TRAP-positive multi-nucleated (B) RAW264.7 cells after RANKL and exogenous mouse IFN-β treatments or RANKL treatment alone. *: P <0.05.