Literature DB >> 25490189

Glioblastoma: imaging genomic mapping reveals sex-specific oncogenic associations of cell death.

Rivka R Colen1, Jixin Wang, Sanjay K Singh, David A Gutman, Pascal O Zinn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the molecular profiles of cell death as defined by necrosis volumes at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and uncover sex-specific molecular signatures potentially driving oncogenesis and cell death in glioblastoma (GBM).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was HIPAA compliant and had institutional review board approval, with waiver of the need to obtain informed consent. The molecular profiles for 99 patients (30 female patients, 69 male patients) were identified from the Cancer Genome Atlas, and quantitative MR imaging data were obtained from the Cancer Imaging Archive. Volumes of necrosis at MR imaging were extracted. Differential gene expression profiles were obtained in those patients (including male and female patients separately) with high versus low MR imaging volumes of tumor necrosis. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis was used for messenger RNA-microRNA interaction analysis. A histopathologic data set (n = 368; 144 female patients, 224 male patients) was used to validate the MR imaging findings by assessing the amount of cell death. A connectivity map was used to identify therapeutic agents potentially targeting sex-specific cell death in GBM.
RESULTS: Female patients showed significantly lower volumes of necrosis at MR imaging than male patients (6821 vs 11 050 mm(3), P = .03). Female patients, unlike male patients, with high volumes of necrosis at imaging had significantly shorter survival (6.5 vs 14.5 months, P = .01). Transcription factor analysis suggested that cell death in female patients with GBM is associated with MYC, while that in male patients is associated with TP53 activity. Additionally, a group of therapeutic agents that can potentially be tested to target cell death in a sex-specific manner was identified.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that cell death in GBM may be driven by sex-specific molecular pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25490189     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14141800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  28 in total

1.  DOIs for DICOM raw images: enabling science reproducibility.

Authors:  Philip E Bourne
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Sexually dimorphic radiogenomic models identify distinct imaging and biological pathways that are prognostic of overall survival in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Niha Beig; Salendra Singh; Kaustav Bera; Prateek Prasanna; Gagandeep Singh; Jonathan Chen; Anas Saeed Bamashmos; Addison Barnett; Kyle Hunter; Volodymyr Statsevych; Virginia B Hill; Vinay Varadan; Anant Madabhushi; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Pallavi Tiwari
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  Imaging signatures of glioblastoma molecular characteristics: A radiogenomics review.

Authors:  Anahita Fathi Kazerooni; Spyridon Bakas; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Imaging genomics in cancer research: limitations and promises.

Authors:  Harrison X Bai; Ashley M Lee; Li Yang; Paul Zhang; Christos Davatzikos; John M Maris; Sharon J Diskin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Multicenter imaging outcomes study of The Cancer Genome Atlas glioblastoma patient cohort: imaging predictors of overall and progression-free survival.

Authors:  Pattana Wangaryattawanich; Masumeh Hatami; Jixin Wang; Ginu Thomas; Adam Flanders; Justin Kirby; Max Wintermark; Erich S Huang; Ali Shojaee Bakhtiari; Markus M Luedi; Syed S Hashmi; Daniel L Rubin; James Y Chen; Scott N Hwang; John Freymann; Chad A Holder; Pascal O Zinn; Rivka R Colen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Quantile Function on Scalar Regression Analysis for Distributional Data.

Authors:  Hojin Yang; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Arvind U K Rao; Jeffrey S Morris
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  New prognostic factor telomerase reverse transcriptase promotor mutation presents without MR imaging biomarkers in primary glioblastoma.

Authors:  Tunc F Ersoy; Vera C Keil; Dariusch R Hadizadeh; Gerrit H Gielen; Rolf Fimmers; Andreas Waha; Barbara Heidenreich; Rajiv Kumar; Hans H Schild; Matthias Simon
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Survival in males with glioma and gastric adenocarcinoma correlates with mutant p53 residual transcriptional activity.

Authors:  Nicholas W Fischer; Aaron Prodeus; Jean Gariépy
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-08-09

9.  Multi-center study finds postoperative residual non-enhancing component of glioblastoma as a new determinant of patient outcome.

Authors:  Aikaterini Kotrotsou; Ahmed Elakkad; Jia Sun; Ginu A Thomas; Dongni Yang; Srishti Abrol; Wei Wei; Jeffrey S Weinberg; Ali S Bakhtiari; Moritz F Kircher; Markus M Luedi; John F de Groot; Raymond Sawaya; Ashok J Kumar; Pascal O Zinn; Rivka R Colen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Sexual dimorphism in glioma glycolysis underlies sex differences in survival.

Authors:  Joseph E Ippolito; Aldrin Kay-Yuen Yim; Jingqin Luo; Prakash Chinnaiyan; Joshua B Rubin
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.