Literature DB >> 25489694

High-resolution anoscopy or expectant management for anal intraepithelial neoplasia for the prevention of anal cancer: is there really a difference?

Benjamin P Crawshaw1, Andrew J Russ, Sharon L Stein, Harry L Reynolds, Eric L Marderstein, Conor P Delaney, Bradley J Champagne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-resolution anoscopy has been shown to improve identification of anal intraepithelial neoplasia but a reduction in progression to anal squamous-cell cancer has not been substantiated when serial high-resolution anoscopy is compared with traditional expectant management.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare high-resolution anoscopy versus expectant management for the surveillance of anal intraepithelial neoplasia and the prevention of anal cancer.
DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of all patients who presented with anal squamous dysplasia, positive anal Pap smears, or anal squamous-cell cancer from 2007 to 2013.
SETTING: This study was performed in the colorectal department of a university-affiliated, tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Included patients had biopsy-proven anal intraepithelial neoplasia from 2007 to 2013.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were treated with high-resolution anoscopy with ablation or standard anoscopy with ablation. Both groups were treated with imiquimod and followed every 6 months indefinitely. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of anal squamous-cell cancer in each group was the primary end point.
RESULTS: From 2007 to 2013, 424 patients with anal squamous dysplasia were seen in the clinic (high-resolution anoscopy, 220; expectant management, 204). Three patients (high-resolution anoscopy, 1; expectant management, 2) progressed to anal squamous-cell cancer; 2 were noncompliant with follow-up and with HIV treatment, and the third was allergic to imiquimod and refused to take topical 5-fluorouracil. The 5-year progression rate was 6.0% (95% CI, 1.5-24.6) for expectant management and 4.5% (95% CI, 0.7-30.8) for high-resolution anoscopy (p = 0.37). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective review. There is potential for selection and referral bias. Because of the rarity of the outcome, the study may be underpowered.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with squamous-cell dysplasia followed with expectant management or high-resolution anoscopy rarely develop squamous-cell cancer if they are compliant with the protocol. The cost, morbidity, and value of high-resolution anoscopy should be further evaluated in lieu of these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25489694     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  14 in total

Review 1.  Basic Science, Epidemiology, and Screening for Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Its Relationship to Anal Squamous Cell Cancer.

Authors:  Kurt G Davis; Guy R Orangio
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2018-11-02

Review 2.  Multidisciplinary Approach to the Management and Treatment of Anal Dysplasia.

Authors:  Jeffrey Douaiher; Sean J Langenfeld
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2018-11-02

3.  Management of precancerous anal intraepithelial lesions in human immunodeficiency virus-positive men who have sex with men: Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Ashish A Deshmukh; Elizabeth Y Chiao; Scott B Cantor; Elizabeth A Stier; Stephen E Goldstone; Alan G Nyitray; Timothy Wilkin; Xiaojie Wang; Jagpreet Chhatwal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  History of High-Resolution Anoscopy.

Authors:  S David Cho; Emily Groves; Victoria V Lao
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2018-11-02

Review 5.  Screening, Surveillance, and Treatment of Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Authors:  Kevin C Long; Raman Menon; Amir Bastawrous; Richard Billingham
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-03

6.  Hellenic society of medical oncology (HESMO) guidelines for the management of anal cancer.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gouvas; Sophia Gourtsoyianni; Maria Angeliki Kalogeridi; John Sougklakos; Louisa Vini; Evangelos Xynos
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-11-24

7.  Prevention of anal cancer -- can we do better?

Authors:  Joel Palefsky; Michael Berry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 8.  The Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge of Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Authors:  Paul Rider; John Hunter; Leander Grimm
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-07-05

9.  Progression of anal intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-positive individuals: predisposing factors.

Authors:  T McCutcheon; A T Hawkins; R L Muldoon; M B Hopkins; T M Geiger; M M Ford
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  What Is the Risk of Anal Carcinoma in Patients With Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia III?

Authors:  Grace C Lee; Hiroko Kunitake; Holly Milch; Lieba R Savitt; Caitlin E Stafford; Liliana G Bordeianou; Todd D Francone; Rocco Ricciardi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.585

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.