Literature DB >> 25489663

Physical, chemical and biological characterization of six biochars produced for the remediation of contaminated sites.

Mackenzie J Denyes1, Michèle A Parisien2, Allison Rutter3, Barbara A Zeeb2.   

Abstract

The physical and chemical properties of biochar vary based on feedstock sources and production conditions, making it possible to engineer biochars with specific functions (e.g. carbon sequestration, soil quality improvements, or contaminant sorption). In 2013, the International Biochar Initiative (IBI) made publically available their Standardized Product Definition and Product Testing Guidelines (Version 1.1) which set standards for physical and chemical characteristics for biochar. Six biochars made from three different feedstocks and at two temperatures were analyzed for characteristics related to their use as a soil amendment. The protocol describes analyses of the feedstocks and biochars and includes: cation exchange capacity (CEC), specific surface area (SSA), organic carbon (OC) and moisture percentage, pH, particle size distribution, and proximate and ultimate analysis. Also described in the protocol are the analyses of the feedstocks and biochars for contaminants including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), metals and mercury as well as nutrients (phosphorous, nitrite and nitrate and ammonium as nitrogen). The protocol also includes the biological testing procedures, earthworm avoidance and germination assays. Based on the quality assurance / quality control (QA/QC) results of blanks, duplicates, standards and reference materials, all methods were determined adequate for use with biochar and feedstock materials. All biochars and feedstocks were well within the criterion set by the IBI and there were little differences among biochars, except in the case of the biochar produced from construction waste materials. This biochar (referred to as Old biochar) was determined to have elevated levels of arsenic, chromium, copper, and lead, and failed the earthworm avoidance and germination assays. Based on these results, Old biochar would not be appropriate for use as a soil amendment for carbon sequestration, substrate quality improvements or remediation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25489663      PMCID: PMC4354376          DOI: 10.3791/52183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  18 in total

Review 1.  Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent--a critical review.

Authors:  Dinesh Mohan; Ankur Sarswat; Yong Sik Ok; Charles U Pittman
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 9.642

2.  Activated carbon and biochar amendments decrease pore-water concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sewage sludge.

Authors:  Patryk Oleszczuk; Sarah E Hale; Johannes Lehmann; Gerard Cornelissen
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 9.642

3.  Modeling the mass transfer of hydrophobic organic pollutants in briefly and continuously mixed sediment after amendment with activated carbon.

Authors:  Sarah E Hale; David Werner
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Characterization of biochars produced from cornstovers for soil amendment.

Authors:  James W Lee; Michelle Kidder; Barbara R Evans; Sokwon Paik; A C Buchanan; Charles T Garten; Robert C Brown
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar.

Authors:  Keri B Cantrell; Patrick G Hunt; Minori Uchimiya; Jeffrey M Novak; Kyoung S Ro
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 9.642

6.  Influence of activated carbon amendment on the accumulation and elimination of PCBs in the earthworm Eisenia fetida.

Authors:  Piuly Paul; Upal Ghosh
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars: effects of feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature on biochar properties.

Authors:  Stefanie Kloss; Franz Zehetner; Alex Dellantonio; Raad Hamid; Franz Ottner; Volker Liedtke; Manfred Schwanninger; Martin H Gerzabek; Gerhard Soja
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.751

8.  The use of biochar to reduce soil PCB bioavailability to Cucurbita pepo and Eisenia fetida.

Authors:  Mackenzie J Denyes; Valérie S Langlois; Allison Rutter; Barbara A Zeeb
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  In situ application of activated carbon and biochar to PCB-contaminated soil and the effects of mixing regime.

Authors:  Mackenzie J Denyes; Allison Rutter; Barbara A Zeeb
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  PCB bioavailability control in Lumbriculus variegatus through different modes of activated carbon addition to sediments.

Authors:  Xueli Sun; Upal Ghosh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  1 in total

1.  Nutrient alterations following biochar application to a Cd-contaminated solution and soil.

Authors:  Liqiang Cui; James A Ippolito; Matt Noerpel; Kirk G Scheckel; Jinlong Yan
Journal:  Biochar       Date:  2021-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.