Literature DB >> 25489163

To study the flow property of seven commercially available zinc oxide eugenol impression material at various time intervals after mixing.

Vishal Katna1, S Suresh2, Sharma Vivek3, Khandelwal Meenakshi3, Gaur Ankita4.   

Abstract

Aims and objective of the study was to evaluate the flow property of seven commercially available zinc oxide eugenol impression materials at various time intervals, after mixing 49 samples (seven groups) were fabricated for flow property of the material. The sample were fabricated as equal length of base and accelerator paste of the test materials was taken on the glass slab and mixed with a rigid stainless steel spatula as per manufacturers recommendation till the homogenous mix was obtained. The mix material was loaded in glass syringe and 0.5 ml material was injected on a cellophane sheet placed on marked glass plate. A cellophane sheet and glass plate 70 and 500 g weight was carefully placed on freshly dispensed zinc oxide eugenol impression paste sequentially. The diameter of the mix was noted after 30 s and 1 min of load application and also after the final set of material. The diameter gives the flow of material. The samples were stored at the room temperature. The data of the flow property was analyzed with analysis of variance, Post hoc test and t test. The flow of the zinc oxide eugenol impression paste after 30 s, 1 min and final set of load application for Group A to Group G was noted. Maximum flow was seen for Group G zinc oxide eugenol impression material followed by Group F, D, E, B, C and A in descending order respectively after 30 s, where as the flow property changed after 1 min in the sequence of maximum for Group G followed by Group E, D, B, A, C, and F. Lastly after final set of the impression material the flow maximum for Group G followed by Group E, D, C, F, A and B in descending order. Based on statistical analysis of the results and within in the limitations of this in-vitro study, the following conclusions were drawn that; the flow of zinc oxide eugenol impression material after 30 s, 1 min and that after the final set was maximum for P.S.P. (Group G) and the flow for PYREX (Group A) was minimum.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flow; Impression paste; Zinc-oxide eugenol

Year:  2014        PMID: 25489163      PMCID: PMC4257930          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-013-0338-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  12 in total

1.  Physical properties of the zinc oxide--eugenol impression pastes.

Authors:  G E MYERS; F A PEYTON
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1961 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Detail reproduction of soft tissue: a comparison of impression materials.

Authors:  D H Pratten; M Novetsky
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Controlling pressures during complete denture impressions.

Authors:  R P Frank
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  1970-07

4.  Analysis of pressures produced during maxillary edentulous impression procedures.

Authors:  R P Frank
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Properties of zinc oxide-eugenol impression pastes.

Authors:  M J Tyas; H J Wilson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1970-11-17       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  An investigation of the rheological properties of several interocclusal registration materials.

Authors:  J Chai; D K Leong; I C Pang
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Impression materials for recording the denture bearing mucosa.

Authors:  A Koran
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  1980-01

8.  Accuracy and dimensional stability of four interocclusal recording materials.

Authors:  Y Balthazar-Hart; J L Sandrik; W F Malone; B Mazur; T Hart
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part I: consistency prior to setting.

Authors:  Konstantinos X Michalakis; Argiris Pissiotis; Vassiliki Anastasiadou; Danai Kapari
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  [Factors affecting the setting time of zinc oxide-eugenol impression materials--the influence of humidity and temperature to the reaction velocity].

Authors:  K Kumagai; N Tamiya; K Iwamoto; Y Taniguchi; H Takeda; K Kikuzuki; H Nemoto; T Hirai; T Hase; Y Yamada
Journal:  Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1989-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  An In Vitro Study to Evaluate and Compare the Flow Property of Different Commercially Available Zinc Oxide Eugenol Impression Materials.

Authors:  Anuj Harish Chandak; Saee P Deshmukh; Usha M Radke; Rajlakshmi S Banerjee; Tushar K Mowade; Akhil Rathi
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2018-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.