Literature DB >> 25488707

Causes for concern: is NICE failing to uphold its responsibilities to all NHS patients?

Karl Claxton1, Mark Sculpher, Stephen Palmer, Anthony J Culyer.   

Abstract

Organisations across diverse health care systems making decisions about the funding of new medical technologies face extensive stakeholder and political pressures. As a consequence, there is quite understandable pressure to take account of other attributes of benefit and to fund technologies, even when the opportunity costs are likely exceed the benefits they offer. Recent evidence suggests that NICE technology appraisal is already approving drugs where more health is likely to be lost than gained. Also, NICE recently proposed increasing the upper bound of the cost-effectiveness threshold to reflect other attributes of benefit but without a proper assessment of the type of benefits that are expected to be displaced. It appears that NICE has taken a direction of travel, which means that more harm than good is being, and will continue to be, done, but it is unidentified NHS patients who bear the real opportunity costs.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25488707     DOI: 10.1002/hec.3130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  32 in total

1.  The importance of being NICE.

Authors:  Annette Rid; Peter Littlejohns; James Wilson; Benedict Rumbold; Katharina Kieslich; Albert Weale
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Myths and Misconceptions of Within-Cycle Correction: A Guide for Modelers and Decision Makers.

Authors:  Elamin H Elbasha; Jagpreet Chhatwal
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Should the Lambda (λ) Remain Silent?

Authors:  Hossein Haji Ali Afzali; Jonathan Karnon; Mark Sculpher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Expanding the Scope of Costs and Benefits for Economic Evaluations in Health: Some Words of Caution.

Authors:  Christopher McCabe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  How Effective is Marginal Healthcare Expenditure? New Evidence from England for 2003/04 to 2012/13.

Authors:  Stephen Martin; James Lomas; Karl Claxton; Francesco Longo
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.561

Review 6.  Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: the Past, the Present and the Future.

Authors:  Praveen Thokala; Jessica Ochalek; Ashley A Leech; Thaison Tong
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Future unrelated medical costs need to be considered in cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Pieter van Baal; Alec Morton; David Meltzer; Werner Brouwer
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2019-02

8.  Cost Effectiveness of Characterised Chondrocyte Implantation for Treatment of Cartilage Defects of the Knee in the UK.

Authors:  Jamie Elvidge; Ash Bullement; Anthony J Hatswell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  The future of cystic fibrosis care: a global perspective.

Authors:  Scott C Bell; Marcus A Mall; Hector Gutierrez; Milan Macek; Susan Madge; Jane C Davies; Pierre-Régis Burgel; Elizabeth Tullis; Claudio Castaños; Carlo Castellani; Catherine A Byrnes; Fiona Cathcart; Sanjay H Chotirmall; Rebecca Cosgriff; Irmgard Eichler; Isabelle Fajac; Christopher H Goss; Pavel Drevinek; Philip M Farrell; Anna M Gravelle; Trudy Havermans; Nicole Mayer-Hamblett; Nataliya Kashirskaya; Eitan Kerem; Joseph L Mathew; Edward F McKone; Lutz Naehrlich; Samya Z Nasr; Gabriela R Oates; Ciaran O'Neill; Ulrike Pypops; Karen S Raraigh; Steven M Rowe; Kevin W Southern; Sheila Sivam; Anne L Stephenson; Marco Zampoli; Felix Ratjen
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 30.700

10.  Modelling tool to support decision-making in the NHS Health Check programme: workshops, systematic review and co-production with users.

Authors:  Martin O'Flaherty; Ffion Lloyd-Williams; Simon Capewell; Angela Boland; Michelle Maden; Brendan Collins; Piotr Bandosz; Lirije Hyseni; Chris Kypridemos
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.014

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.