Literature DB >> 25487958

The criteria of the Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centres on DOACs: a "real world" application in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients already on vitamin K antagonist.

Doris Barcellona1, Miro Luzza, Nicola Battino, Lara Fenu, Francesco Marongiu.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the number of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), anticoagulated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA), and monitored in our Thrombosis Centre, who could replace VKA with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) based on the Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centres (FCSA) consensus criteria. A total of 525 NVAF patients treated with VKA were studied. Therapeutic range (TTR) assessment and a capillary test for serum creatinine measure were carried out. The patients' preference was evaluated through the administration of a dedicated questionnaire. A history of intracranial bleeding was also taken into account. DOACs would cover 29 % of the patients considering a TTR <70 %; the percentage falls to 10 % if a TTR <55 % is considered. Only 20 % of the patients would move from VKA to DOACs because of the lack of an antidote and laboratory checks during DOACs therapy. Thirty-three percent of patients were worried that they would forget to take the tablets twice a day. About 2 % of patients could not use DOACs since their glomerular filtration rate was less than 30 ml/min, while in 23.6 %, a reduction in the daily dose of DOACs would have been required due to renal failure. TTR assessment, renal function and a previous history of intracranial bleeding would reduce the percentage of patients who could switch from VKA to DOACs, but it is the patients' preference that strongly influences the percentage of those who would benefit from DOACs treatment. However, if laboratory controls were available, it would rise considerably.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25487958     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-014-1155-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  25 in total

Review 1.  The laboratory and the direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Armando Tripodi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Perioperative management of patients who are receiving a novel oral anticoagulant.

Authors:  Aaron Liew; James Douketis
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Dabigatran: how the drug company withheld important analyses.

Authors:  Deborah Cohen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-07-23

4.  Concerns over data in key dabigatran trial.

Authors:  Deborah Cohen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-07-23

5.  The effect of dabigatran plasma concentrations and patient characteristics on the frequency of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients: the RE-LY Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy).

Authors:  Paul A Reilly; Thorsten Lehr; Sebastian Haertter; Stuart J Connolly; Salim Yusuf; John W Eikelboom; Michael D Ezekowitz; Gerhard Nehmiz; Susan Wang; Lars Wallentin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Mark J Alberts; John W Eikelboom; Graeme J Hankey
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 44.182

7.  Development and evaluation of a reagent carrier with a new reaction sequence for the determination of creatinine in blood, plasma, serum and urine.

Authors:  C A Carstensen; R Nagel; E Knoll; H Wisser; G Weidemann; W F Riesen; D Seiler; D Nagel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem       Date:  1993-05

8.  A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  F R Rosendaal; S C Cannegieter; F J van der Meer; E Briët
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 9.  Medication adherence: its importance in cardiovascular outcomes.

Authors:  P Michael Ho; Chris L Bryson; John S Rumsfeld
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Robert P Giugliano; Christian T Ruff; Eugene Braunwald; Sabina A Murphy; Stephen D Wiviott; Jonathan L Halperin; Albert L Waldo; Michael D Ezekowitz; Jeffrey I Weitz; Jindřich Špinar; Witold Ruzyllo; Mikhail Ruda; Yukihiro Koretsune; Joshua Betcher; Minggao Shi; Laura T Grip; Shirali P Patel; Indravadan Patel; James J Hanyok; Michele Mercuri; Elliott M Antman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Direct oral anticoagulants: what can we learn?

Authors:  Francesco Marongiu; Doris Barcellona
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Heterogeneity in Preferences for Anti-coagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation: A Latent Class Analysis.

Authors:  Janine van Til; Catharina Oudshoorn-Groothuis; Marieke Weernink; Clemens von Birgelen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Thrombosis centres and AVKs monitoring in COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Doris Barcellona; Francesco Marongiu
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Portable coagulometer for vitamin K-antagonist monitoring: the patients' point of view.

Authors:  Doris Barcellona; Diego Mastino; Francesco Marongiu
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Patient Preferences for Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Stroke Prevention: A Multicountry Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Thomas Wilke; Anna-Katharina Meinecke; Bernhard Schaefer; Sandra Buchwald; Daniel Eriksson; Sabrina Müller
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.866

Review 6.  Patient Preferences for Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Thomas Wilke; Sabine Bauer; Sabrina Mueller; Thomas Kohlmann; Rupert Bauersachs
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.883

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.