Literature DB >> 25487791

Assessment of time to clinical response, a proxy for discharge readiness, among hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia who received either ceftaroline fosamil or ceftriaxone in two phase III FOCUS trials.

Thomas P Lodise1, Antonio R Anzueto2, David J Weber3, Andrew F Shorr4, Min Yang5, Alexander Smith6, Qi Zhao7, Xingyue Huang7, Thomas M File8.   

Abstract

The primary driver of health care costs for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the hospital length of stay (LOS). Unfortunately, hospital LOS comparisons are difficult to make from phase III CAP trials because of their structured designs and prespecified treatment durations. However, an opportunity still exists to draw inferences about potential LOS differences between treatments through the use of surrogates for hospital discharge. The intent of this study was to quantify the time to a clinical response, a proxy for the time to discharge readiness, among hospitalized CAP patients who received either ceftaroline or ceftriaxone in two phase III CAP FOCUS clinical trials. On the basis of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and American Thoracic Society CAP management guidelines and recent FDA guidance documents for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, a post hoc adjudication algorithm was constructed a priori to compare the time to a clinical response, a proxy for the time to discharge readiness, between patients who received ceftaroline or ceftriaxone. Overall, 1,116 patients (ceftaroline, n=562; ceftriaxone, n=554) from the pooled FOCUS trials met the selection criteria for this analysis. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that ceftaroline was associated with a shorter time, measured in days, to meeting the clinical response criteria (P=0.03). Of the patients on ceftaroline, 61.0, 76.1, and 83.6% achieved a clinical response by days 3, 4, and 5, compared to 54.3, 69.8, and 79.3% of the ceftriaxone-treated patients. In the Cox regression, ceftaroline was associated with a shorter time to a clinical response (HR, 1.16, P=0.02). The methodology employed here provides a framework to draw comparative effectiveness inferences from phase III CAP efficacy trials. (The FOCUS trials whose data were analyzed in this study have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00621504 and NCT00509106.).
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25487791      PMCID: PMC4335888          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.03643-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  16 in total

1.  Practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  J G Bartlett; S F Dowell; L A Mandell; T M File; D M Musher; M J Fine
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-09-07       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.

Authors:  Lionel A Mandell; Richard G Wunderink; Antonio Anzueto; John G Bartlett; G Douglas Campbell; Nathan C Dean; Scott F Dowell; Thomas M File; Daniel M Musher; Michael S Niederman; Antonio Torres; Cynthia G Whitney
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Community-acquired pneumonia: the U.S. perspective.

Authors:  Michael S Niederman
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 3.119

4.  Relationship between time to clinical response and outcomes among Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team (PORT) risk class III and IV hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia who received ceftriaxone and azithromycin.

Authors:  Evan Zasowski; Jill M Butterfield; Louise-Ann McNutt; Jason Cohen; Leon Cosler; Manjunath P Pai; Joseph Gottwald; Wen Zhen Chen; Thomas P Lodise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Time to clinical stability in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: implications for practice guidelines.

Authors:  E A Halm; M J Fine; T J Marrie; C M Coley; W N Kapoor; D S Obrosky; D E Singer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  FOCUS 2: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Donald E Low; Thomas M File; Paul B Eckburg; George H Talbot; H David Friedland; Jon Lee; Lily Llorens; Ian A Critchley; Dirk A Thye
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  The newer guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Purvin B Shah; James C Giudice; Russell Griesback; Thomas F Morley; Amita Vasoya
Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc       Date:  2004-12

Review 8.  Burden of community-acquired pneumonia in North American adults.

Authors:  Thomas M File; Thomas J Marrie
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Association between time to clinical stability and outcomes after discharge in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Stefano Aliberti; Paula Peyrani; Giovanni Filardo; Mehdi Mirsaeidi; Asad Amir; Francesco Blasi; Julio A Ramirez
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Discharge Delay in Patients with Community-acquired Pneumonia Managed on a Critical Pathway.

Authors:  Jeremy J Moeller; Martin Ma; Paul Hernandez; Thomas Marrie; Claire Touchie; Ward Patrick
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.471

View more
  7 in total

1.  Lessons learned from 2 decades of CAP therapy data: ways to improve patient management.

Authors:  Michael T Bender; Michael S Niederman
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Predictors and Implications of Early Clinical Stability in Patients Hospitalized for Moderately Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Authors:  Nicolas Garin; Garance Felix; Christian Chuard; Daniel Genné; Sebastian Carballo; Olivier Hugli; Olivier Lamy; Christophe Marti; Mathieu Nendaz; Olivier Rutschmann; Stephan Harbarth; Arnaud Perrier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Community acquired pneumonia among adult patients at an Egyptian university hospital: bacterial etiology, susceptibility profile and evaluation of the response to initial empiric antibiotic therapy.

Authors:  Rehab H El-Sokkary; Raghdaa A Ramadan; Mohamed El-Shabrawy; Lobna A El-Korashi; Abeer Elhawary; Sameh Embarak; Rehab M Elsaid Tash; Neveen G Elantouny
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  1g versus 2 g daily intravenous ceftriaxone in the treatment of community onset pneumonia - a propensity score analysis of data from a Japanese multicenter registry.

Authors:  Shinya Hasegawa; Ryuichi Sada; Makito Yaegashi; Konosuke Morimoto; Takahiro Mori
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 5.  Ceftaroline.

Authors:  A Soriano
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 1.553

Review 6.  Ceftaroline in severe community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  C Cilloniz; J M Pericàs; J Rojas
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.515

7.  Post Hoc Assessment of Time to Clinical Response Among Adults Hospitalized with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia Who Received Either Lefamulin or Moxifloxacin in 2 Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Thomas Lodise; Sam Colman; Daniel S Stein; David Fitts; Lisa Goldberg; Elizabeth Alexander; Patrick J Scoble; Jennifer Schranz
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.835

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.