| Literature DB >> 25487079 |
Vaishali K Patadia1, Preciosa Coloma, Martijn J Schuemie, Ron Herings, Rosa Gini, Giampiero Mazzaglia, Gino Picelli, Carla Fornari, Lars Pedersen, Johan van der Lei, Miriam Sturkenboom, Gianluca Trifirò.
Abstract
A prospective pharmacovigilance signal detection study, comparing the real-world healthcare data (EU-ADR) and two spontaneous reporting system (SRS) databases, US FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System and WHO's Vigibase is reported. The study compared drug safety signals found in the EU-ADR and SRS databases. The potential for signal detection in the EU-ADR system was found to be dependent on frequency of the event and utilization of drugs in the general population. The EU-ADR system may have a greater potential for detecting signals for events occurring at higher frequency in general population and those that are commonly not considered as potentially a drug-induced event. Factors influencing various differences between the datasets are discussed along with potential limitations and applications to pharmacovigilance practice.Entities:
Keywords: EU-ADR; FAERS; adverse drug reactions; data mining; electronic health records; pharmacovigilance; real-world healthcare data; signal detection; spontaneous reporting systems
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25487079 DOI: 10.1586/17512433.2015.992878
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ISSN: 1751-2433 Impact factor: 5.045