Literature DB >> 25486637

Spatial variation of ultrafine particles and black carbon in two cities: results from a short-term measurement campaign.

Jochem O Klompmaker1, Denise R Montagne1, Kees Meliefste1, Gerard Hoek2, Bert Brunekreef3.   

Abstract

Recently, short-term monitoring campaigns have been carried out to investigate the spatial variation of air pollutants within cities. Typically, such campaigns are based on short-term measurements at relatively large numbers of locations. It is largely unknown how well these studies capture the spatial variation of long term average concentrations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the within-site temporal and between-site spatial variation of the concentration of ultrafine particles (UFPs) and black carbon (BC) in a short-term monitoring campaign. In Amsterdam and Rotterdam (the Netherlands) measurements of number counts of particles larger than 10nm as a surrogate for UFP and BC were performed at 80 sites per city. Each site was measured in three different seasons of 2013 (winter, spring, summer). Sites were selected from busy urban streets, urban background, regional background and near highways, waterways and green areas, to obtain sufficient spatial contrast. Continuous measurements were performed for 30 min per site between 9 and 16 h to avoid traffic spikes of the rush hour. Concentrations were simultaneously measured at a reference site to correct for temporal variation. We calculated within- and between-site variance components reflecting temporal and spatial variations. Variance ratios were compared with previous campaigns with longer sampling durations per sample (24h to 14 days). The within-site variance was 2.17 and 2.44 times higher than the between-site variance for UFP and BC, respectively. In two previous studies based upon longer sampling duration much smaller variance ratios were found (0.31 and 0.09 for UFP and BC). Correction for temporal variation from a reference site was less effective for the short-term monitoring campaign compared to the campaigns with longer duration. Concentrations of BC and UFP were on average 1.6 and 1.5 times higher at urban street compared to urban background sites. No significant differences between the other site types and urban background were found. The high within to between-site concentration variances may result in the loss of precision and low explained variance when average concentrations from short-term campaigns are used to develop land use regression models.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Black carbon; Mobile monitoring; Spatial variation; Ultrafine particles; Variance ratio

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25486637     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  9 in total

1.  Outdoor ultrafine particle concentrations in front of fast food restaurants.

Authors:  Cristina Vert; Kees Meliefste; Gerard Hoek
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  An accurate filter loading correction is essential for assessing personal exposure to black carbon using an Aethalometer.

Authors:  Nicholas Good; Anna Mölter; Jennifer L Peel; John Volckens
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Characterization of Annual Average Traffic-Related Air Pollution Concentrations in the Greater Seattle Area from a Year-Long Mobile Monitoring Campaign.

Authors:  Magali N Blanco; Amanda Gassett; Timothy Gould; Annie Doubleday; David L Slager; Elena Austin; Edmund Seto; Timothy V Larson; Julian D Marshall; Lianne Sheppard
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 4.  New Methods for Personal Exposure Monitoring for Airborne Particles.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-12

5.  Comparisons of Traffic-Related Ultrafine Particle Number Concentrations Measured in Two Urban Areas by Central, Residential, and Mobile Monitoring.

Authors:  Matthew C Simon; Neelakshi Hudda; Elena N Naumova; Jonathan I Levy; Doug Brugge; John L Durant
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Land Use Regression Models for Ultrafine Particles in Six European Areas.

Authors:  Erik van Nunen; Roel Vermeulen; Ming-Yi Tsai; Nicole Probst-Hensch; Alex Ineichen; Mark Davey; Medea Imboden; Regina Ducret-Stich; Alessio Naccarati; Daniela Raffaele; Andrea Ranzi; Cristiana Ivaldi; Claudia Galassi; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Ariadna Curto; David Donaire-Gonzalez; Marta Cirach; Leda Chatzi; Mariza Kampouri; Jelle Vlaanderen; Kees Meliefste; Daan Buijtenhuijs; Bert Brunekreef; David Morley; Paolo Vineis; John Gulliver; Gerard Hoek
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Spatial and Spatiotemporal Variability of Regional Background Ultrafine Particle Concentrations in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Esther van de Beek; Jules Kerckhoffs; Gerard Hoek; Geert Sterk; Kees Meliefste; Ulrike Gehring; Roel Vermeulen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Pedestrian exposure to black carbon and PM2.5 emissions in urban hot spots: new findings using mobile measurement techniques and flexible Bayesian regression models.

Authors:  Honey Dawn Alas; Almond Stöcker; Nikolaus Umlauf; Oshada Senaweera; Sascha Pfeifer; Sonja Greven; Alfred Wiedensohler
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 6.371

9.  Detection of Coxiella burnetii in Ambient Air after a Large Q Fever Outbreak.

Authors:  Myrna M T de Rooij; Floor Borlée; Lidwien A M Smit; Arnout de Bruin; Ingmar Janse; Dick J J Heederik; Inge M Wouters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.