Roshanak Mehdipanah1, Ana Manzano2, Carme Borrell3, Davide Malmusi3, Maica Rodriguez-Sanz3, Joanne Greenhalgh2, Carles Muntaner4, Ray Pawson2. 1. Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: rmehdipa.work@gmail.com. 2. School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, UK. 3. Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain; Ciber de Epidemiología y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Spain. 4. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry and Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Urban populations are growing and to accommodate these numbers, cities are becoming more involved in urban renewal programs to improve the physical, social and economic conditions in different areas. This paper explores some of the complexities surrounding the link between urban renewal, health and health inequalities using a theory-driven approach. METHODS: We focus on an urban renewal initiative implemented in Barcelona, the Neighbourhoods Law, targeting Barcelona's (Spain) most deprived neighbourhoods. We present evidence from two studies on the health evaluation of the Neighbourhoods Law, while drawing from recent urban renewal literature, to follow a four-step process to develop a program theory. We then use two specific urban renewal interventions, the construction of a large central plaza and the repair of streets and sidewalks, to further examine this link. DISCUSSION: In order for urban renewal programs to affect health and health inequality, neighbours must use and adapt to the changes produced by the intervention. However, there exist barriers that can result in negative outcomes including factors such as accessibility, safety and security. CONCLUSION: This paper provides a different perspective to the field that is largely dominated by traditional quantitative studies that are not always able to address the complexities such interventions provide. Furthermore, the framework and discussions serve as a guide for future research, policy development and evaluation.
INTRODUCTION: Urban populations are growing and to accommodate these numbers, cities are becoming more involved in urban renewal programs to improve the physical, social and economic conditions in different areas. This paper explores some of the complexities surrounding the link between urban renewal, health and health inequalities using a theory-driven approach. METHODS: We focus on an urban renewal initiative implemented in Barcelona, the Neighbourhoods Law, targeting Barcelona's (Spain) most deprived neighbourhoods. We present evidence from two studies on the health evaluation of the Neighbourhoods Law, while drawing from recent urban renewal literature, to follow a four-step process to develop a program theory. We then use two specific urban renewal interventions, the construction of a large central plaza and the repair of streets and sidewalks, to further examine this link. DISCUSSION: In order for urban renewal programs to affect health and health inequality, neighbours must use and adapt to the changes produced by the intervention. However, there exist barriers that can result in negative outcomes including factors such as accessibility, safety and security. CONCLUSION: This paper provides a different perspective to the field that is largely dominated by traditional quantitative studies that are not always able to address the complexities such interventions provide. Furthermore, the framework and discussions serve as a guide for future research, policy development and evaluation.
Authors: Alina S Schnake-Mahl; Jaquelyn L Jahn; S V Subramanian; Mary C Waters; Mariana Arcaya Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Caislin L Firth; Yan Kestens; Meghan Winters; Kevin Stanley; Scott Bell; Benoit Thierry; Kole Phillips; Zoé Poirier-Stephens; Daniel Fuller Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 8.915
Authors: Tamara Dubowitz; Ann Haas; Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar; Rebecca L Collins; Robin Beckman; Stephanie Brooks Holliday; Andrea S Richardson; Lauren Hale; Daniel J Buysse; Matthew P Buman; Wendy M Troxel Journal: Sleep Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Rosaleen O'Brien; Katie Buston; Daniel Wight; Elizabeth McGee; Jane White; Marion Henderson Journal: Trials Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Mahasin S Mujahid; Elizabeth Kelley Sohn; Jacob Izenberg; Xing Gao; Melody E Tulier; Matthew M Lee; Irene H Yen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 4.614