Literature DB >> 25486340

Cross-modal prediction changes the timing of conscious access during the motion-induced blindness.

Acer Y C Chang1, Ryota Kanai2, Anil K Seth3.   

Abstract

Despite accumulating evidence that perceptual predictions influence perceptual content, the relations between these predictions and conscious contents remain unclear, especially for cross-modal predictions. We examined whether predictions of visual events by auditory cues can facilitate conscious access to the visual stimuli. We trained participants to learn associations between auditory cues and colour changes. We then asked whether congruency between auditory cues and target colours would speed access to consciousness. We did this by rendering a visual target subjectively invisible using motion-induced blindness and then gradually changing its colour while presenting congruent or incongruent auditory cues. Results showed that the visual target gained access to consciousness faster in congruent than in incongruent trials; control experiments excluded potentially confounding effects of attention and motor response. The expectation effect was gradually established over blocks suggesting a role for extensive training. Overall, our findings show that predictions learned through cross-modal training can facilitate conscious access to visual stimuli.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audiovisual association; Motion induced blindness; Predictive coding

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25486340     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  7 in total

1.  Competitive Frontoparietal Interactions Mediate Implicit Inferences.

Authors:  Martijn E Wokke; Tony Ro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Are auditory cues special? Evidence from cross-modal distractor-induced blindness.

Authors:  Lea Kern; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.157

3.  Surprising Threats Accelerate Conscious Perception.

Authors:  Jessica McFadyen; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Jason B Mattingley; Marta I Garrido
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.617

4.  Dynamic Interactions between Top-Down Expectations and Conscious Awareness.

Authors:  Erik L Meijs; Heleen A Slagter; Floris P de Lange; Simon van Gaal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Individual differences in change blindness are predicted by the strength and stability of visual representations.

Authors:  Nora Andermane; Jenny M Bosten; Anil K Seth; Jamie Ward
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2019-01-24

Review 6.  Why and How. The Future of the Central Questions of Consciousness.

Authors:  Marek Havlík; Eva Kozáková; Jiří Horáček
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-11

7.  Simulated forward and backward self motion, based on realistic parameters, causes motion induced blindness.

Authors:  Victoria Thomas; Matthew Davidson; Parisa Zakavi; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Jeroen van Boxtel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.