Literature DB >> 25485722

High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of prostate cancer: A prospective trial with long-term follow-up.

Luigi Mearini1, Leonardo D'Urso, Devis Collura, Elisabetta Nunzi, Giovanni Muto, Massimo Porena.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a minimally invasive treatment for prostate cancer. Data from the literature show promising oncological outcomes with a favourable side-effect profile. The aim of this study was to re-evaluate and bring up to date the follow-up of a previously published, prospective trial on HIFU as the primary treatment for prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2007, 163 consecutive men with T1-T3N0M0 prostate cancer underwent HIFU with the Sonablate 500. Follow-up included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests every 3 months after treatment and a random prostate biopsy at 6 months. Failure was defined according to positive findings at the 6 month biopsy and biochemical failure was defined according to the Phoenix criteria. Biochemical-free survival, metastasis-free survival and cancer-specific survival were calculated by Kaplan-Meier curves.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 72.0 months. Of the 160 evaluable patients, 104 (65%) were biochemically disease free; in low- to intermediate-risk disease, on Kaplan-Meier analysis the 8 year biochemical-non-evidence of disease (bNED), metastasis-free survival and cancer-specific survival rates were 69.6%, 81.3%, 100% and 40.5%, 60.6%, 100%, respectively. A PSA nadir below 0.40 ng/ml and risk stratification have an independent predictive value for bNED and metastasis-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS: A long-term favourable outcome of HIFU is associated with careful patient selection, with low- to intermediate-risk disease being the ideal case. A low postoperative PSA nadir is a predictor of long-term bNED.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochemical-free survival; HIFU; cancer-specific survival; high-intensity focused ultrasound; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25485722     DOI: 10.3109/21681805.2014.988174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol        ISSN: 2168-1805            Impact factor:   1.612


  6 in total

Review 1.  Prostate MR Imaging for Posttreatment Evaluation and Recurrence.

Authors:  Sonia Gaur; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 2.  Clinical application of the therapeutic ultrasound in urologic disease: Part II of therapeutic ultrasound in urology.

Authors:  Minh-Tung Do; Tam Hoai Ly; Min Joo Choi; Sung Yong Cho
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 3.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Francesca V Mertan; Matthew D Greer; Sam Borofsky; Ismail M Kabakus; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-06

4.  Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy after High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Failure.

Authors:  Leon Telis; Seyed Behzad Jazayeri; David B Samadi
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2017-01-24

5.  Effects of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation on bone mechanical properties and modeling.

Authors:  Sin Yuin Yeo; Andrés J Arias Moreno; Bert van Rietbergen; Natalie D Ter Hoeve; Paul J van Diest; Holger Grüll
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2015-08-11

6.  The primary treatment of prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yue He; Ping Tan; Mingjing He; Liang Hu; Jianzhong Ai; Lu Yang; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.