Sherif Emil1, Justine M Nagurney2, Elise Mok3, Michael D Prislin4. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Que. 2. Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Que. 3. Clinical Research Center, The Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que. 4. Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, Calif.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Canada and the United States have similar medical education systems, but different health care systems. We surveyed medical students in Ontario and California to assess their knowledge and views about health care policy and systems, with an emphasis on attitudes toward universal care. METHODS: A web-based survey was administered during the 2010-2011 academic year to students in 5 medical schools in Ontario and 4 in California. The survey collected demographic data and evaluated attitudes and knowledge regarding broad health care policy issues and health care systems. An index of support for universal health care was created, and logistic regression models were used to examine potential determinants of such support. RESULTS: Responses were received from 2241 students: 1354 from Ontario and 887 from California, representing 42.9% of eligible respondents. Support for universal health care coverage was higher in Ontario (86.8%) than in California (51.1%), p < 0.001. In California, females, self-described nonconservatives, students with the intent to be involved in health care policy as physicians and students with a primary care orientation were associated with support for universal coverage. In Ontario, self-described liberals and accurate knowledge of the Canadian system were associated with support. A single-payer system for practice was preferred by 35.6% and 67.4% of students in California and Ontario, respectively. The quantity of instruction on health care policy in the curriculum was judged too little by 73.1% and 57.5% of students in California and Ontario, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Medical students in Ontario are substantially more supportive of universal access to health care than their California counterparts. A majority of students in both regions identified substantial curricular deficiencies in health care policy instruction.
BACKGROUND: Canada and the United States have similar medical education systems, but different health care systems. We surveyed medical students in Ontario and California to assess their knowledge and views about health care policy and systems, with an emphasis on attitudes toward universal care. METHODS: A web-based survey was administered during the 2010-2011 academic year to students in 5 medical schools in Ontario and 4 in California. The survey collected demographic data and evaluated attitudes and knowledge regarding broad health care policy issues and health care systems. An index of support for universal health care was created, and logistic regression models were used to examine potential determinants of such support. RESULTS: Responses were received from 2241 students: 1354 from Ontario and 887 from California, representing 42.9% of eligible respondents. Support for universal health care coverage was higher in Ontario (86.8%) than in California (51.1%), p < 0.001. In California, females, self-described nonconservatives, students with the intent to be involved in health care policy as physicians and students with a primary care orientation were associated with support for universal coverage. In Ontario, self-described liberals and accurate knowledge of the Canadian system were associated with support. A single-payer system for practice was preferred by 35.6% and 67.4% of students in California and Ontario, respectively. The quantity of instruction on health care policy in the curriculum was judged too little by 73.1% and 57.5% of students in California and Ontario, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Medical students in Ontario are substantially more supportive of universal access to health care than their California counterparts. A majority of students in both regions identified substantial curricular deficiencies in health care policy instruction.
Authors: Jaya R Agrawal; Jeffrey Huebner; Joan Hedgecock; Ashwini R Sehgal; Paul Jung; Steven R Simon Journal: Acad Med Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Kristin M Huntoon; Colin J McCluney; Christopher A Scannell; Elizabeth A Wiley; Richard Bruno; Allen Andrews; Paul Gorman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-09-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Robert A Dugger; Abdulrahman M El-Sayed; Catherine Messina; Richard Bronson; Sandro Galea Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Shikhar H Shah; Maureen D Clark; Kimberly Hu; Jalene A Shoener; Joshua Fogel; William C Kling; James Ronayne Journal: JMIR Med Educ Date: 2017-10-17