Literature DB >> 25484717

Crystal structure of 2-bromo-benzoic acid at 120 K: a redetermination.

Kornelia Kowalska1, Damian Trzybiński1, Artur Sikorski1.   

Abstract

The crystal structure of the title compound, C7H5BrO2, was originally studied using photographic data at room temperature with Cu Kα radiation [Ferguson & Sim (1962 ▶). Acta Cryst. 15, 346-350]. The present study was undertaken at 120 K with a CCD diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation, and resulted in improved geometrical parameters. In the mol-ecule, the carb-oxy group is inclined to the benzene ring by 18.7 (2)° and there is a close intra-molecular Br⋯O contact of 3.009 (3) Å. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked by pairs of O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming inversion dimers with the classical R 2 (2)(8) ring motif for carb-oxy-lic acids. Neighbouring dimers are linked by weak C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming tapes propagating in [1-10]. Adjacent tapes inter-act by slipped parallel π-π inter-actions [inter-centroid distance = 3.991 (2), inter-planar distance = 3.509 (2) Å, slippage = 1.900 Å] to form columns approximately along the b-axis direction. Neighbouring columns inter-act dispersively, forming a three-dimensional framework structure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2-bromo­benzoic acid; crystal structure; hydrogen bonds; redetermination; π–π inter­actions

Year:  2014        PMID: 25484717      PMCID: PMC4257184          DOI: 10.1107/S160053681402087X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the original report of the unit-cell dimensions, space group and structure of the title compound, see: Ferguson & Sim (1962 ▶). For uses of the title compound in organic synthesis, see: Evano et al. (2008 ▶); Wolf et al. (2006 ▶), and for its physicochemical properties, see: Govindarajan et al. (2011 ▶); Sabbah & Aguilar (1996 ▶); Swaminathan et al. (2009 ▶). For related structures involving the title compound, see: Das et al. (2012 ▶); Wales et al. (2012 ▶). For reports on Br⋯O inter­actions, see: Jones & Lozano (2004 ▶); Saeed et al. (2013 ▶); Singh et al. (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H5BrO2 M = 201.01 Monoclinic, a = 14.7955 (4) Å b = 3.99062 (15) Å c = 22.9240 (8) Å β = 96.906 (3)° V = 1343.69 (8) Å3 Z = 8 Cu Kα radiation μ = 7.76 mm−1 T = 120 K 0.55 × 0.35 × 0.28 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Gemini R Ultra Ruby CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2008 ▶) T min = 0.722, T max = 0.991 10883 measured reflections 1201 independent reflections 1172 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.067

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.035 wR(F 2) = 0.091 S = 1.18 1201 reflections 95 parameters 1 restraint H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.82 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.52 e Å−3

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2008 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis CCD; data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEPII (Burnett & Johnson, 1976 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681402087X/su2783sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681402087X/su2783Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681402087X/su2783Isup3.cml Click here for additional data file. . DOI: 10.1107/S160053681402087X/su2783fig1.tif The mol­ecular structure of the title mol­ecule, with atom labeling. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 25% probability level. The short intra­molecular Br⋯O contact [3.009 (3) Å] is shown as a dashed line. Click here for additional data file. ac x y z x y z x y z . DOI: 10.1107/S160053681402087X/su2783fig2.tif A partial view perpendicular to the ac plane of the crystal packing of the title compound. The O–H⋯O and C–H⋯O hydrogen bonds are represented by dashed lines [see Table 1 for details; symmetry codes: (i) –x + 1, –y + 1, –z + 1; (ii) x–1/2, y + , z; (iii) –x + , –y + , –z + 1]. Click here for additional data file. b x y z . DOI: 10.1107/S160053681402087X/su2783fig3.tif A view along the b axis of the crystal packing of the title compound. The π–π inter­actions are represented by dashed lines [symmetry code: (iv) x, y + 1, z]. CCDC reference: 1024798 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H5BrO2F(000) = 784
Mr = 201.01Dx = 1.987 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMelting point: 422.6 K
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
a = 14.7955 (4) ÅCell parameters from 10883 reflections
b = 3.99062 (15) Åθ = 3.9–67.3°
c = 22.9240 (8) ŵ = 7.76 mm1
β = 96.906 (3)°T = 120 K
V = 1343.69 (8) Å3Block, white
Z = 80.55 × 0.35 × 0.28 mm
Oxford Diffraction Gemini R Ultra Ruby CCD diffractometer1201 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1172 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.067
Detector resolution: 10.4002 pixels mm-1θmax = 67.3°, θmin = 3.9°
ω scansh = −17→17
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2008)k = −4→4
Tmin = 0.722, Tmax = 0.991l = −27→27
10883 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.091H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.18w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.048P)2 + 4.6943P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1201 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
95 parametersΔρmax = 0.82 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = −0.52 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.3119 (2)0.3168 (9)0.40413 (14)0.0222 (7)
C20.3109 (2)0.1534 (9)0.34999 (14)0.0230 (7)
C30.2293 (2)0.0629 (9)0.31713 (16)0.0268 (8)
H30.2296−0.04690.28140.032*
C40.1473 (2)0.1375 (10)0.33802 (16)0.0297 (8)
H40.09270.07400.31640.036*
C50.1463 (2)0.3045 (10)0.39040 (15)0.0277 (8)
H50.09120.35800.40380.033*
C60.2278 (2)0.3931 (10)0.42318 (15)0.0265 (8)
H60.22660.50570.45860.032*
C70.3963 (2)0.4020 (9)0.44374 (15)0.0243 (7)
O80.47061 (15)0.2776 (8)0.44031 (11)0.0337 (6)
O90.38191 (16)0.6217 (8)0.48460 (11)0.0315 (6)
H90.427 (2)0.659 (12)0.5071 (15)0.033 (11)*
Br100.41826 (2)0.04521 (11)0.315985 (15)0.03005 (19)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0158 (15)0.0262 (18)0.0240 (16)0.0011 (13)−0.0009 (12)0.0025 (14)
C20.0188 (15)0.0263 (18)0.0232 (16)0.0026 (13)−0.0001 (12)0.0022 (14)
C30.0231 (18)0.031 (2)0.0248 (17)0.0008 (14)−0.0028 (14)−0.0001 (14)
C40.0181 (16)0.036 (2)0.0326 (18)−0.0030 (15)−0.0053 (13)0.0049 (16)
C50.0154 (15)0.036 (2)0.0308 (17)0.0016 (14)0.0007 (13)0.0050 (16)
C60.0192 (17)0.037 (2)0.0225 (16)0.0034 (15)0.0012 (13)0.0033 (15)
C70.0209 (17)0.0309 (19)0.0207 (16)−0.0011 (14)0.0009 (13)0.0034 (14)
O80.0147 (12)0.0520 (18)0.0326 (13)0.0064 (11)−0.0052 (9)−0.0121 (12)
O90.0183 (12)0.0472 (17)0.0277 (13)0.0030 (12)−0.0035 (10)−0.0109 (12)
Br100.0190 (2)0.0420 (3)0.0286 (3)0.00389 (14)0.00077 (16)−0.00733 (15)
C1—C21.400 (5)C4—H40.9300
C1—C61.401 (5)C5—C61.388 (5)
C1—C71.492 (5)C5—H50.9300
C2—C31.392 (5)C6—H60.9300
C2—Br101.901 (3)C7—O81.217 (4)
C3—C41.389 (5)C7—O91.319 (5)
C3—H30.9300O9—H90.803 (19)
C4—C51.375 (5)
C2—C1—C6117.5 (3)C3—C4—H4119.8
C2—C1—C7124.4 (3)C4—C5—C6119.8 (3)
C6—C1—C7118.1 (3)C4—C5—H5120.1
C3—C2—C1121.1 (3)C6—C5—H5120.1
C3—C2—Br10115.6 (3)C5—C6—C1121.5 (3)
C1—C2—Br10123.3 (2)C5—C6—H6119.2
C4—C3—C2119.7 (3)C1—C6—H6119.2
C4—C3—H3120.2O8—C7—O9122.8 (3)
C2—C3—H3120.2O8—C7—C1124.3 (3)
C5—C4—C3120.4 (3)O9—C7—C1112.9 (3)
C5—C4—H4119.8C7—O9—H9113 (3)
C6—C1—C2—C3−1.6 (5)C4—C5—C6—C10.1 (6)
C7—C1—C2—C3175.8 (3)C2—C1—C6—C51.3 (5)
C6—C1—C2—Br10177.6 (3)C7—C1—C6—C5−176.3 (3)
C7—C1—C2—Br10−4.9 (5)C2—C1—C7—O8−17.1 (6)
C1—C2—C3—C40.5 (6)C6—C1—C7—O8160.4 (4)
Br10—C2—C3—C4−178.8 (3)C2—C1—C7—O9164.8 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C51.0 (6)C6—C1—C7—O9−17.7 (5)
C3—C4—C5—C6−1.3 (6)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O9—H9···O8i0.81 (3)1.84 (3)2.643 (3)177 (5)
C5—H5···O8ii0.932.653.514 (3)153
C6—H6···O9iii0.932.643.417 (3)141
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O9—H9⋯O8i 0.81 (3)1.84 (3)2.643 (3)177 (5)
C5—H5⋯O8ii 0.932.653.514 (3)153
C6—H6⋯O9iii 0.932.643.417 (3)141

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  9 in total

1.  Secondary interactions in 3-bromopyridinium tribromoacetate.

Authors:  Peter G Jones; Virginia Lozano
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 1.172

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

Review 3.  Copper-mediated coupling reactions and their applications in natural products and designed biomolecules synthesis.

Authors:  Gwilherm Evano; Nicolas Blanchard; Mathieu Toumi
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Vibrational spectroscopic analysis of 2-bromobenzoic and anthranilic acids: a combined experimental and theoretical study.

Authors:  M Govindarajan; K Ganasan; S Periandy; S Mohan; F Tedlamelekot
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 4.098

5.  Br···O contacts and π-π stacking dominate the packing in methyl 4-bromo-3,5-dimethoxybenzoate.

Authors:  Aamer Saeed; Muhammad Qasim; Jim Simpson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  Regioselective copper-catalyzed amination of bromobenzoic acids using aliphatic and aromatic amines.

Authors:  Christian Wolf; Shuanglong Liu; Xuefeng Mei; Adam T August; Michael D Casimir
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 4.354

7.  FT-IR and FT-Raman vibrational assignment of 2-bromobenzoic acid with the help of ab initio and DFT calculations.

Authors:  J Swaminathan; M Ramalingam; H Saleem; V Sethuraman; M T Noorul Ameen
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 4.098

8.  2-Bromo-3-nitro-benzaldehyde.

Authors:  Vijay P Singh; Harkesh B Singh; Ray J Butcher
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-10-17

9.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.