Literature DB >> 25484414

Amelanotic melanoma masquerading as a superficial small round cell tumor: a diagnostic challenge.

Archana Shetty1, Savitha Anil Kumar1, V Geethamani1, Mudasser Rehan2.   

Abstract

Malignant melanoma poses a remarkable capacity for morphological diversity and often presents as a diagnostic challenge due to its wide clinical presentation. We present a case of a 73-year-old lady, with a large superficial ulcerative nodular mass on the flexor aspect of the right upper arm. On fine needle aspiration poorly differentiated round cell tumor was suggested, with histopathology also supporting the same diagnosis. A final diagnosis of amelanotic melanoma was given following immunohistochemical work-up using a panel of relevant markers. We are presenting this case, not only for its rare clinical presentation, but also for the diagnostic difficulties encountered by us in cytology and histopathology to reach the final diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amelanotic melanoma; histopathology; immnohistochemistry; superficial small round cell tumor

Year:  2014        PMID: 25484414      PMCID: PMC4248522          DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.143569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Dermatol        ISSN: 0019-5154            Impact factor:   1.494


What was known? Malignant melanoma of the skin although common, can mimic a wide variety of lesions clinically. Amelanotic melanoma is a variant of melanoma, which is diagnosed only after a complete work-up, which includes histopathology and IHC.

Introduction

Melanomas, mainly of the skin are common tumors, but the incidence of amelanotic melanomas has been estimated to be between 1.8% and 8.1% of all melanomas.[1] Amelanotic malignant melanoma is a subtype of cutaneous malignant melanoma that has little or no pigment on visual inspection, as a result of which it can masquerade as a variety of other benign and malignant skin conditions.[2] Herein we present a similar case, in a 73-year-old lady, presenting as a soft-tissue mass with the final diagnosis being reached only after marker studies.

Case Report

A 73-year-old lady, farmer by occupation, presented to the surgical out-patient department with a large ulcerative nodular mass of 3 months duration, in the flexor aspect of the right hand, above the elbow joint, rapidly increasing in size, ulcerated since 2 weeks [Figure 1].
Figure 1

Ulcero-nodular growth on the postero – medial aspect of the right upper arm

Ulcero-nodular growth on the postero – medial aspect of the right upper arm Fine needle aspiration was carried out a diagnosis of poorly differentiated round cell tumor was made on cytology [Figure 2].
Figure 2

Pap stain of fine needle aspiration cytology – cellular smears with sheets of discohesive round cells

Pap stain of fine needle aspiration cytology – cellular smears with sheets of discohesive round cells Magnetic resonance imaging showed a soft-tissue mass in the right arm, involving the skin and subcutaneous soft-tissue measuring 7 cm × 6 cm × 5 cm, ulnar nerve sandwiched between the mass and triceps, with no definite infiltration. Wide surgical excision of the mass was performed [Figure 3].
Figure 3

Cut section showing a grey white tumor measuring 7 cm × 5 cm × 4 cm, with hemorrhage

Histopathology showed a dermal neoplasm comprising of small round cells. Mitotic activity was high (2-3/hpf), with areas of necrosis seen. A diagnosis of poorly differentiated round cell tumor was made [Figure 4a–c] and the patient got discharged against medical advice.
Figure 4a

(H and E, ×10) showing the tumor with ulcerated overlying skin

Figure 4c

H and E stain showing individual round tumor cells with mitotic figure (arrow) and occasional prominent nucleoli

Cut section showing a grey white tumor measuring 7 cm × 5 cm × 4 cm, with hemorrhage (H and E, ×10) showing the tumor with ulcerated overlying skin (H and E, ×10) showing the undifferentiated tumor cells in sheets without any definite arrangement H and E stain showing individual round tumor cells with mitotic figure (arrow) and occasional prominent nucleoli To further categorize the tumor immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers were used comprising Pan cytokeratin (CK), CD45, S-100, CD99, epithelial membrane antigen, CD34, B-cell lymphoma-2 (bcl-2), CK7, CK19, Human Melanoma Black-45 (HMB-45) and CD56. The tumor cells were positive focally for CD99, focally for S-100 and strongly positive for HMB-45. Fonatana–Masson staining did not reveal any melanin pigment. A final diagnosis of amelanotic melanoma was made, with a Clark's grading of V and Breslow's thickness of 1.5 mm. The patient was contacted to come for further management repeatedly, but has not turned up until date.

Discussion

Malignant melanomas most commonly occur on skin (over 90%) and less commonly on mucosal surfaces (slightly over 1%). It accounts for approximately 4% of all skin cancers, but is responsible for 79% of all skin cancer related deaths.[3] Amelanotic melanoma usually occurs in sun-exposed skin of elderly with photo damage, simulating various skin lesions. It can also be an exophytic nodule, often eroded[2] as in our case. But the tumor size in our patient is one of the largest on presentation, as per PubMed/Medline search. Cytologically, a high cell yield with a predominant population of dissociated cells, showing nuclear pleomorphism, prominent nucleoli and increased mitotic activity can be seen. However, diagnosis of the amelanotic variant on cytology is challenging because in the absence of pigment, the tumor cells mimic those of carcinoma or sarcoma, like in our case.[4] Even on histopathology melanoma has attained diagnostic notoriety for its capacity for histomorphological diversity and ability to masquerade as a number of non-melanocytic neoplasms, especially true for the amelanotic variety.[5] Histopathological examination alone, as in our case can leave the pathologist with an extensive list of differential diagnoses as mentioned in Table 1. As each of the tumors express characteristic patterns of markers, IHC is often essential in the formulation of a definitive diagnosis.[6]
Table 1

Histopathological differentials to be considered for superficial small round cell tumors

Histopathological differentials to be considered for superficial small round cell tumors With a provisional diagnosis on histopathology as poorly differentiated round cell tumor, which comprise sarcomas, carcinomas, melanomas and lymphomas[7] we ran the initial panel of markers – Pan CK, CD45 and S-100. Pan CK and CD45 were negative, which ruled our carcinomas and lymphomas. S-100 was focally positive. The next panel comprised of desmin, vimentin, CD34, CK7, bcl-2 and CD99. Focal staining for bcl-2 was seen, which still ruled out synovial sarcomas and lymphomas as CK7 and CD45 were negative CD99 was focally positive, but as S-100 was also positive possibilities of primitive neuroectodermal tumor and Ewing's were ruled out. A last panel of CD56 and HMB-45 were done. A strong positivity for HMB-45 was seen, this along with S-100 positivity [Figure 5a–c], absence of pigment on Masson's Fontana stain and histomorphology helped us to a diagnosis of amelanotic melanoma, similar to studies of Limketkai B et al, Roy et al. and Oguri et al.[8910]
Figure 5a

Focal CD99 staining

Figure 5c

Strong positivity for HMB-45

Focal CD99 staining Strong positivity for S-100 Strong positivity for HMB-45 A review of our slides did not reveal a few features typical of a melanoma such as pigment, junctional activity, grooves and pseudo inclusions, but cells showing prominent nucleoli, high mitotic activity, infiltration into the surrounding tissues was seen. Malignant melanoma is notorious its great microscopic variability.[11] Many hypothesis have been proposed to explain the lack of pigment in amelanotic melanoma such as lack of tyrosinase, agenesis of melanosomes, undetectable levels of melanin production or abnormal melanogenesis.[1] A study of 36 cases of amelanotic melanoma by Gualandri et al. concluded that amelanotic melanomas have an intrinsic faster speed of growth, worse prognosis, with Breslow's thickness being the most important determinant factor.[12] Treatment of melanoma, including the amelanotic variant is wide surgical excision in combination with chemotherapy and to a lesser extent immunotherapy and radiation, with a check on nodal status.[3]

Conclusion

Amelanotic melanoma, like in our case can have a very deceptive clinical presentation. The aim of this presentation is to highlight on the fact that when a diagnosis of poorly differentiated round cell tumor is made, possibility of amelanotic melanoma must also be kept in mind, with one melanotic marker being included in the IHC panel, thereby preventing diagnostic delay and aiding in better patient management. What is new? Amelanotic melanoma must be considered as one of the differentials in cases show in histopathological features of a superficial poorly differentiated small round cell tumor. One melanotic marker must be included in the IHC panel, to rule out amelanotic melanoma, thereby preventing diagnostic delay and aiding in better patient management.
  6 in total

1.  Unusual presentation of metastatic amelanotic melanoma of unknown primary origin as a solitary breast lump.

Authors:  Somak Roy; Kajal Dhingra; Shramana Mandal; Nita Khurana
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.599

2.  Nodular amelanotic melanoma.

Authors:  Rashmi Nalamwar; Vidya Kharkar; Sunanda Mahajan; Sidhhi Chikhalkar; Uday Khopkar
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 3.  Superficial small round-cell tumors with special reference to the Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors and the spectrum of differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Isidro Machado; Victor Traves; Julia Cruz; Beatriz Llombart; Samuel Navarro; Antonio Llombart-Bosch
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 4.  A primary amelanotic melanoma of the vagina, diagnosed by immunohistochemical staining with HMB-45, which recurred as a pigmented melanoma.

Authors:  H Oguri; C Izumiya; N Maeda; T Fukaya; T Moriki
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Clinical features of 36 cases of amelanotic melanomas and considerations about the relationship between histologic subtypes and diagnostic delay.

Authors:  L Gualandri; R Betti; C Crosti
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 6.166

6.  Amelanotic melanoma masquerading as a granular cell lesion.

Authors:  Deepak Pandiar; Shaini Basheer; P M Shameena; S Sudha; Lakshmi J Dhana
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2013-02-25
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Amelanotic Melanoma in the Vicinity of Acquired Melanocytic Nevi and not Arising from Agminated Melanocytic Nevi: Masquerading as Pyogenic Granuloma.

Authors:  Angoori Gnaneshwar Rao; V Ashok Babu; Divya Koppada; M Haritha; P Chandana
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.494

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.