Literature DB >> 25484358

Conspecific disturbance contributes to altered hibernation patterns in bats with white-nose syndrome.

James M Turner1, Lisa Warnecke1, Alana Wilcox1, Dylan Baloun1, Trent K Bollinger2, Vikram Misra3, Craig K R Willis4.   

Abstract

The emerging wildlife disease white-nose syndrome (WNS) affects both physiology and behaviour of hibernating bats. Infection with the fungal pathogen Pseudogymnoascus destructans (Pd), the first pathogen known to target torpid animals, causes an increase in arousal frequency during hibernation, and therefore premature depletion of energy stores. Infected bats also show a dramatic decrease in clustering behaviour over the winter. To investigate the interaction between disease progression and torpor expression we quantified physiological (i.e., timing of arousal, rewarming rate) and behavioural (i.e., arousal synchronisation, clustering) aspects of rewarming events over four months in little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) experimentally inoculated with Pd. We tested two competing hypotheses: 1) Bats adjust arousal physiology adaptively to help compensate for an increase in energetically expensive arousals. This hypothesis predicts that infected bats should increase synchronisation of arousals with colony mates to benefit from social thermoregulation and/or that solitary bats will exhibit faster rewarming rates than clustered individuals because rewarming costs fall as rewarming rate increases. 2) As for the increase in arousal frequency, changes in arousal physiology and clustering behaviour are maladaptive consequences of infection. This hypothesis predicts no effect of infection or clustering behaviour on rewarming rate and that disturbance by normothermic bats contributes to the overall increase in arousal frequency. We found that arousals of infected bats became more synchronised than those of controls as hibernation progressed but the pattern was not consistent with social thermoregulation. When a bat rewarmed from torpor, it was often followed in sequence by up to seven other bats in an arousal "cascade". Moreover, rewarming rate did not differ between infected and uninfected bats, was not affected by clustering and did not change over time. Our results support our second hypothesis and suggest that disturbance, not social thermoregulation, explains the increased synchronisation of arousals. Negative pathophysiological effects of WNS on energy conservation may therefore be compounded by maladaptive changes in behaviour of the bats, accelerating fat depletion and starvation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behaviour; Hibernation; Myotis lucifugus; Rewarming rate; Torpor; White-nose syndrome

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25484358     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  12 in total

1.  White-nose syndrome increases torpid metabolic rate and evaporative water loss in hibernating bats.

Authors:  Liam P McGuire; Heather W Mayberry; Craig K R Willis
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Warming up and shipping out: arousal and emergence timing in hibernating little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus).

Authors:  Zenon J Czenze; Craig K R Willis
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Bat population recoveries give insight into clustering strategies during hibernation.

Authors:  Natália Martínková; Stuart J E Baird; Vlastislav Káňa; Jan Zima
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  White-Nose Syndrome Disease Severity and a Comparison of Diagnostic Methods.

Authors:  Liam P McGuire; James M Turner; Lisa Warnecke; Glenna McGregor; Trent K Bollinger; Vikram Misra; Jeffrey T Foster; Winifred F Frick; A Marm Kilpatrick; Craig K R Willis
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.184

5.  Experimental Infection of Tadarida brasiliensis with Pseudogymnoascus destructans, the Fungus That Causes White-Nose Syndrome.

Authors:  Michelle L Verant; Carol U Meteyer; Benjamin Stading; David S Blehert
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.389

6.  Field trial of a probiotic bacteria to protect bats from white-nose syndrome.

Authors:  Joseph R Hoyt; Kate E Langwig; J Paul White; Heather M Kaarakka; Jennifer A Redell; Katy L Parise; Winifred F Frick; Jeffrey T Foster; A Marm Kilpatrick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Transcriptional host-pathogen responses of Pseudogymnoascus destructans and three species of bats with white-nose syndrome.

Authors:  Christina M Davy; Michael E Donaldson; Hana Bandouchova; Ana M Breit; Nicole A S Dorville; Yvonne A Dzal; Veronika Kovacova; Emma L Kunkel; Natália Martínková; Kaleigh J O Norquay; James E Paterson; Jan Zukal; Jiri Pikula; Craig K R Willis; Christopher J Kyle
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 5.882

8.  Ectoparasites may serve as vectors for the white-nose syndrome fungus.

Authors:  Radek K Lučan; Hana Bandouchova; Tomáš Bartonička; Jiri Pikula; Alexandra Zahradníková; Jan Zukal; Natália Martínková
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  White-nose syndrome survivors do not exhibit frequent arousals associated with Pseudogymnoascus destructans infection.

Authors:  Thomas Mikael Lilley; Joseph Samuel Johnson; Lasse Ruokolainen; Elisabeth Jeannine Rogers; Cali Ann Wilson; Spencer Mead Schell; Kenneth Alan Field; DeeAnn Marie Reeder
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Galleria mellonella experimental model for bat fungal pathogen Pseudogymnoascus destructans and human fungal pathogen Pseudogymnoascus pannorum.

Authors:  Beth Burgwyn Fuchs; Sudha Chaturvedi; Rodnei Dennis Rossoni; Patricia P de Barros; Fernando Torres-Velez; Eleftherios Mylonakis; Vishnu Chaturvedi
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 5.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.