BACKGROUND: Development of functional monoclonal antibodies against intractable GPCR targets. RESULTS: Identification of structured peptides mimicking the ligand binding site, their use in panning to enrich for a population of binders, and the subsequent challenge of this population with receptor overexpressing cells leads to functional monoclonal antibodies. CONCLUSION: The combination of techniques provides a successful strategic approach for the development of functional monoclonal antibodies against CXCR2 in a relatively small campaign. SIGNIFICANCE: The presented combination of techniques might be applicable for other, notoriously difficult, GPCR targets. SUMMARY: The CXC chemokine receptor-2 (CXCR2) is a member of the large 'family A' of G-protein-coupled-receptors and is overexpressed in various types of cancer cells. CXCR2 is activated by binding of a number of ligands, including interleukin 8 (IL-8) and growth-related protein α (Gro-α). Monoclonal antibodies capable of blocking the ligand-receptor interaction are therefore of therapeutic interest; however, the development of biological active antibodies against highly structured GPCR proteins is challenging. Here we present a combination of techniques that improve the discovery of functional monoclonal antibodies against the native CXCR2 receptor. The IL-8 binding site of CXCR2 was identified by screening peptide libraries with the IL-8 ligand, and then reconstructed as soluble synthetic peptides. These peptides were used as antigens to probe an antibody fragment phage display library to obtain subpopulations binding to the IL-8 binding site of CXCR2. Further enrichment of the phage population was achieved by an additional selection round with CXCR2 overexpressing cells as a different antigen source. The scFvs from the CXCR2 specific phage clones were sequenced and converted into monoclonal antibodies. The obtained antibodies bound specifically to CXCR2 expressing cells and inhibited the IL-8 and Gro-α induced ß-arrestin recruitment with IC50 values of 0.3 and 0.2 nM, respectively, and were significantly more potent than the murine monoclonal antibodies (18 and 19 nM, respectively) obtained by the classical hybridoma technique, elicited with the same peptide antigen. According to epitope mapping studies, the antibody efficacy is largely defined by N-terminal epitopes comprising the IL-8 and Gro-α binding sites. The presented strategic combination of in vitro techniques, including the use of different antigen sources, is a powerful alternative for the development of functional monoclonal antibodies by the classical hybridoma technique, and might be applicable to other GPCR targets.
BACKGROUND: Development of functional monoclonal antibodies against intractable GPCR targets. RESULTS: Identification of structured peptides mimicking the ligand binding site, their use in panning to enrich for a population of binders, and the subsequent challenge of this population with receptor overexpressing cells leads to functional monoclonal antibodies. CONCLUSION: The combination of techniques provides a successful strategic approach for the development of functional monoclonal antibodies against CXCR2 in a relatively small campaign. SIGNIFICANCE: The presented combination of techniques might be applicable for other, notoriously difficult, GPCR targets. SUMMARY: The CXC chemokine receptor-2 (CXCR2) is a member of the large 'family A' of G-protein-coupled-receptors and is overexpressed in various types of cancer cells. CXCR2 is activated by binding of a number of ligands, including interleukin 8 (IL-8) and growth-related protein α (Gro-α). Monoclonal antibodies capable of blocking the ligand-receptor interaction are therefore of therapeutic interest; however, the development of biological active antibodies against highly structured GPCR proteins is challenging. Here we present a combination of techniques that improve the discovery of functional monoclonal antibodies against the native CXCR2 receptor. The IL-8 binding site of CXCR2 was identified by screening peptide libraries with the IL-8 ligand, and then reconstructed as soluble synthetic peptides. These peptides were used as antigens to probe an antibody fragment phage display library to obtain subpopulations binding to the IL-8 binding site of CXCR2. Further enrichment of the phage population was achieved by an additional selection round with CXCR2 overexpressing cells as a different antigen source. The scFvs from the CXCR2 specific phage clones were sequenced and converted into monoclonal antibodies. The obtained antibodies bound specifically to CXCR2 expressing cells and inhibited the IL-8 and Gro-α induced ß-arrestin recruitment with IC50 values of 0.3 and 0.2 nM, respectively, and were significantly more potent than the murine monoclonal antibodies (18 and 19 nM, respectively) obtained by the classical hybridoma technique, elicited with the same peptide antigen. According to epitope mapping studies, the antibody efficacy is largely defined by N-terminal epitopes comprising the IL-8 and Gro-α binding sites. The presented strategic combination of in vitro techniques, including the use of different antigen sources, is a powerful alternative for the development of functional monoclonal antibodies by the classical hybridoma technique, and might be applicable to other GPCR targets.
Authors: Beili Wu; Ellen Y T Chien; Clifford D Mol; Gustavo Fenalti; Wei Liu; Vsevolod Katritch; Ruben Abagyan; Alexei Brooun; Peter Wells; F Christopher Bi; Damon J Hamel; Peter Kuhn; Tracy M Handel; Vadim Cherezov; Raymond C Stevens Journal: Science Date: 2010-10-07 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: John A Belperio; Michael P Keane; Marie D Burdick; Vedang Londhe; Ying Ying Xue; Kewang Li; Roderick J Phillips; Robert M Strieter Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: D P Olszyna; S Florquin; M Sewnath; J Branger; P Speelman; S J van Deventer; R M Strieter; T van der Poll Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2001-06-27 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Demetrios K Vassilatis; John G Hohmann; Hongkui Zeng; Fusheng Li; Jane E Ranchalis; Marty T Mortrud; Analisa Brown; Stephanie S Rodriguez; John R Weller; Abbie C Wright; John E Bergmann; George A Gaitanaris Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-04-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Conor McMahon; Dean P Staus; Laura M Wingler; Jialu Wang; Meredith A Skiba; Matthias Elgeti; Wayne L Hubbell; Howard A Rockman; Andrew C Kruse; Robert J Lefkowitz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Bas van der Woning; Gitte De Boeck; Christophe Blanchetot; Vladimir Bobkov; Alex Klarenbeek; Michael Saunders; Magali Waelbroeck; Toon Laeremans; Jan Steyaert; Anna Hultberg; Hans De Haard Journal: MAbs Date: 2016-05-21 Impact factor: 5.857
Authors: Martin J Scott; Amanda Jowett; Martin Orecchia; Peter Ertl; Larissa Ouro-Gnao; Julia Ticehurst; David Gower; John Yates; Katie Poulton; Carol Harris; Michael J Mullin; Kathrine J Smith; Alan P Lewis; Nick Barton; Michael L Washburn; Ruud de Wildt Journal: MAbs Date: 2020 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 5.857