| Literature DB >> 25484043 |
Chien-Hsing Chang1, Yang Wang, Pankaj Gupta, David M Goldenberg.
Abstract
Epratuzumab has demonstrated therapeutic activity in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, systemic lupus erythematosus, and Sjögren's syndrome, but its mechanism of affecting normal and malignant B cells remains incompletely understood. We reported previously that epratuzumab displayed in vitro cytotoxicity to CD22-expressing Burkitt lymphoma cell lines (Daudi and Ramos) only when immobilized on plates or combined with a crosslinking antibody plus a suboptimal amount of anti-IgM (1 μg/mL). Herein, we show that, in the absence of additional anti-IgM ligation, extensive crosslinking of CD22 by plate-immobilized epratuzumab induced intracellular changes in Daudi cells similar to ligating B-cell antigen receptor with a sufficiently high amount of anti-IgM (10 μg/mL). Specifically, either treatment led to phosphorylation of CD22, CD79a and CD79b, along with their translocation to lipid rafts, both of which were essential for effecting caspase-dependent apoptosis. Moreover, such immobilization induced stabilization of F-actin, phosphorylation of Lyn, ERKs and JNKs, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), decrease in mitochondria membrane potential (Δψm), upregulation of pro-apoptotic Bax, and downregulation of anti-apoptotic Bcl-xl and Mcl-1. The physiological relevance of immobilized epratuzumab was implicated by noting that several of its in vitro effects, including apoptosis, drop in Δψm, and generation of ROS, could be observed with soluble epratuzumab in Daudi cells co-cultivated with human umbilical vein endothelial cells. These results suggest that the in vivo mechanism of non-ligand-blocking epratuzumab may, in part, involve the unmasking of CD22 to facilitate the trans-interaction of B cells with vascular endothelium.Entities:
Keywords: 488-annexin V, Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated annexin V; 7-AAD, 7-aminoactinomycin D, Syk, spleen tyrosine kinase; Anti-IgM, F(ab’)2 fragment of affinity-purified goat anti-human IgM, Fc5μ fragment; BCR; BCR, B-cell antigen receptor; BSA, bovine serum albumin; CD22; CM-H2DCF-DA, 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate; DNP, 2,4-dinitrophenyl; EC, endothelial cells; ERKs, extracellular signal-regulated kinases; FBS, fetal bovine serum; FITC-DNase I, fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated DNase I; GAH, F(ab′)2 fragment of affinity-purified goat anti-human IgG Fcγ fragment-specific; HUV-EC; HUV-EC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; ITIM, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif; JNKs, c-Jun N-terminal kinases; JP, jasplakinolide; LatB, latrunculin B; Lyn, Lck/Yes novel tyrosine kinase; MAP kinases, mitogen-activated protein kinases; MTS, (3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium; PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PLCγ2, phospholipase C, isotype gamma 2; ROS, reactive oxygen species; Rhodamine-anti-IgG, rhodamine-conjugated F(ab′)2 fragment of affinity-purified goat anti-human IgG, F(ab′)2 fragment-specific; TMRE/tetramethylrhodamine/ethyl ester; epratuzumab; human B-cell lymphoma; immobilized; mIgM, membrane IgM; Δψm, mitochondria membrane potential
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25484043 PMCID: PMC4622945 DOI: 10.4161/19420862.2014.979081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MAbs ISSN: 1942-0862 Impact factor: 5.857
Invitro conditions to evaluate the cytotoxicity of epratuzumab against CD22-expressing B cells
| Conditions | Format |
|---|---|
| Target cells + epratuzumab IgG immobilized onto microtiter wells overnight | Dried-I |
| Target cells + labetuzumab IgG immobilized onto microtiter wells overnight | Isotype control for Dried-I |
| Target cells + epratuzumab IgG over a monolayer of HUV-EC | Dried-II |
| Target cells + labetuzumab IgG over a monolayer of HUV-EC | Isotype control for Dried-II |
| Target cells + epratuzumab IgG or F(ab’)2 in solution | Wet-I |
| Target cells + epratuzumab IgG + GAH in solution | Wet-IIA |
| Target cells + epratuzumab IgG + anti-IgM (1 μg/mL) in solution | Wet-IIB |
| Target cells + epratuzumab IgG + GAH + anti-IgM (1 μg/mL) in solution | Wet-III |
| Target cells + epratuzumab IgG conjugated to polystyrene beads | Particulate-I |
| Target cells + epratuzumab IgG bound to Protein A-Sepharose | Particulate-II |
| Target cells + anti-IgM (10 μg/mL) in solution | Positive control |
Figure 1.Evaluation of growth-inhibition and apoptosis in D1–1 and Ramos cells. Cell viability determined by the MTS assay after 4-day incubation for (A) the Dried-I format of epratuzumab (hLL2*) or labetuzumab (hMN-14*) and (B) the Wet-I format of epratuzumab (hLL2) or labetuzumab (hMN-14). Apoptosis as determine by Annexin V staining (C) following the indicated treatments of D1–1 and Ramos cells for 24 and 48 h, respectively. (D) Plate-immobilized F(ab’)2 of epratuzumab (hLL2 F(ab’)2*) effectively induced apoptosis (left panel) and inhibited proliferation (right panel) in D1–1 cells as determined by the annexin V assay at 24 h and the MTS assay after 4 days, respectively. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD), where n = 3. Significant differences compared to untreated or nonspecific antibody are indicated with ^ (P < 0.005) and # (P < 0.05).
Figure 2.Cytotoxicity of epratuzumab in various formats to Daudi cells. (A) Epratuzumab presented as the Dried-I (hLL2*) or Wet-III (hLL2 + GAH + anti-IgM) format (right panel), but not the Wet-I (hLL2) or Wet-IIB (hLL2 + GAH) format (left panel), induced dose-dependent cytotoxicity in Daudi cells, as measured by the MTS assay. (B) The Dried-I format of epratuzumab (hLL2*) induced apoptosis comparable to the positive control (anti-IgM) as determined by the Annexin V assay. (C) The Dried-I format (hLL2*) and the Dried-II format (hLL2 + HUV-EC), in which soluble epratuzumab was added to a monolayer of HUV-EC, induced apoptosis in Daudi cells to a similar extent (∼50%).
Figure 3.Phosphorylation of CD79a, CD79b, and CD22. Western blot analyses of phosphorylated CD79a, CD79b, and CD22 in D1–1 cells treated for 2 h with (A) the Wet-I format of soluble antibodies (left panel) or the Dried-I format of immobilized antibodies (right panel), and (B) various formats of soluble epratuzumab, including Wet-I (lane 4; hLL2, 7.5 μg/mL), Wet-IIA (lane 5; hLL2, 7.5 μg/mL; GAH, 10 μg/mL), and Wet-III (lane 7; hLL2, 7.5 μg/mL; GAH, 10 μg/mL; anti-IgM, 1 μg/mL). In lane 6, the amounts of GAH and anti-IgM were the same as those in lane 7, but the concentration of epratuzumab was too low (10 ng/mL) to induce a notable effect.
Figure 4.Translocation of CD79a, CD79b, and CD22 to the lipid rafts. (A) left panel, CD22 was detected in the lipid rafts (fractions 3–6) following treatment of D1–1 cells with anti-IgM (10 μg/mL) and both the Wet-I (hLL2, 20 μg/mL) and Dried-I (hLL2*, 20 μg/mL) formats of epratuzumab; right panel, CD79b was translocated to the lipid rafts (fractions 4–7) by either anti-IgM (10 μg/mL) or the Dried-I format of epratuzumab (hLL2*, 20 μg/mL), but not soluble epratuzumab (hLL2). (B) Anti-IgM (lane 6) and epratuzumab of the Dried-I (lane 3) or Wet-III (lane 4) format, but not the Wet-I (lane 2) or Wet-IIA (lane 5) format, induced redistribution of CD22, CD79a, and CD79b to the lipid rafts.
Figure 5.Phosphorylation of BCR-mediated signals, modulation of MAP kinases, and evidence of caspase-dependent apoptosis. (A) D1–1 cells were incubated with the Dried-I format of epratuzumab for the indicated times and cell lysates probed for phosphorylated Lyn, Syk, or PLCγ2. (B) The cell lysates of D1–1 cells obtained as described in (A) were probed for phosphorylated ERKs and JNK. (C) SP600125, a chemical inhibitor for JNK, protected D1–1 cells from apoptosis induced by plate-immobilized epratuzumab (hLL2*). (D) Western blot analysis of selective anti- and pro-apoptotic proteins following treatment of D1–1 cells with plate-immobilized epratuzumab (hLL2*) for 24, 48 and 72 h. The untreated sample at 72 h is shown. (E) Plate-immobilized epratuzumab (hLL2*; lanes 2–4) induced cleavages of caspase 3, caspase 9 and PARP, which were evident at 48 (lane 3) and 72 h (lane 4). The untreated sample at 72 h is shown (lane 1). (F) Z-VAD-fmk inhibited apoptosis in D1–1 cells induced by plate-immobilized epratuzumab (hLL2*).
Figure 6.Effect on Δψm and ROS. (A) Treatment of D1–1 cells with the Dried-I format of epratuzumab (hLL2*) induced a decrease in Δψm. (B) Treatment of Daudi cells with the Dried-II format (HUV-EC/hLL2) also induced a decrease in Δψm, similar to that observed with the Dried-I format (hLL2*). (C) Both the Dried-I (hLL2*) and the Dried-II (HUV-EC/hLL2) formats of epratuzumab increased the generation of ROS in Daudi cells.
Figure 7.Decrease in intracellular calcium release and perturbation of actin dynamics. (A) Pretreatment of Daudi cells with the Wet-I (hLL2) or the Dried-I (hLL2*) format of epratuzumab for 1 h reduced the mobilization of intracellular calcium ions following stimulation with anti-IgM, but did not affect the subsequent entry of extracellular calcium. (B) The ligation of CD22 by plate-immobilized epratuzumab (hLL2*) stabilized the F-actin from depolymerization by LatB. (C) Before the addition of LatB (left panel), F-actin was visualized by staining with rhodamine phalloidin in untreated Daudi cells, as well as in cells pretreated with the Dried-I format of epratuzumab (hLL2*), the isotype control of the Dried-I format (hMN-14*), or the Wet-I format of epratuzumab (hLL2). The addition of LatB (right panel) did not affect the staining of F-actin in cells pretreated with hLL2*, but demolished the staining of F-actin in the other 3.
Figure 8.Schematics of proposed mechanism of epratuzumab-mediated interaction of endothelial cells with CD22-expressing B cells. (A) CD22 can interact with CD22L (sialylated glycoproteins) on the same (cis) or different cells (trans). To induce the trans interaction, it is necessary to overcome the cis interaction, which may be provided by non-ligand-blocking epratuzumab. Because Daudi cells have a high levels of CD22L, the binding of CD22 to (activated) endothelial cells are inhibited by cis-binding. The ligation of epratuzumab to CD22 is likely to break up the cis-interaction, and because it is not a blocking antibody, epratuzumab may not interfere with the further binding of CD22 to the CD22L expressed on activated endothelial cells. Thus, epratuzumab plays an indirect role to facilitate an efficient binding of B cells to endothelial cells, which mimics the direct binding of B cells to immobilized epratuzumab. (B) Epratuzumab enables the attachment of CD22-expressing B cells to EC in the endothelium via the trans-interaction of CD22 with CD22L. (C) Epratuzumab links CD22-expressing B cells to EC in the endothelium via the Fc-FcγR binding.