Literature DB >> 25483785

Towards better implementation of cancer screening in Europe through improved monitoring and evaluation and greater engagement of cancer registries.

Ahti Anttila1, Stefan Lönnberg2, Antonio Ponti3, Eero Suonio4, Patricia Villain4, Jan Willem Coebergh5, Lawrence von Karsa4.   

Abstract

Proposals to improve implementation, monitoring and evaluation of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening programmes have been developed in a European project involving scientists and professionals experienced in cancer registration (EUROCOURSE). They call for a clear and more active role for cancer registries through better interfaces with cancer screening programmes and adapting data contents of cancer registries for evaluation purposes. Cancer registries are recognised as essential for adequate evaluation of cancer screening programmes, but they are not involved in screening evaluation in several European countries. This is a key barrier to improving the effectiveness of programmes across Europe. The variation in Europe in the implementation of cancer screening offers a unique opportunity to learn from best practices in collaboration between cancer registries and screening programmes. Population-based cancer registries have experience and tools in collecting and analysing relevant data, e.g. for diagnostic and therapeutic determinants of mortality. In order to accelerate improvements in cancer control we argue that cancer registries should take co-responsibility in promoting effective screening evaluation in Europe. Additional investments are vital to further development of infrastructures and activities for screening evaluation and monitoring in the national settings and also at the pan-European level. The EUROCOURSE project also aimed to harmonise implementation of the European quality assurance guidelines for cancer screening programmes across Europe through standardising routine data collection and analysis, and definitions for key performance indicators for screening registers. Data linkage between cancer and screening registers and other repositories of demographic data and cause of death and where available clinical registers is key to implementing the European screening standards and thereby reducing the burden of disease through early detection. Greater engagement of cancer registries in this collaborative effort is also essential to develop adequate evaluation of innovations in cancer prevention and care.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer prevention; Cancer registration; Cancer screening; Epidemiology; Evaluation; Monitoring; Quality assurance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25483785     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  13 in total

1.  Harms and Benefits of Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Bernt-Peter Robra
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2021

Review 2.  Population-based cancer screening programmes in low-income and middle-income countries: regional consultation of the International Cancer Screening Network in India.

Authors:  Sudha Sivaram; Gautam Majumdar; Douglas Perin; Ashrafun Nessa; Mireille Broeders; Elsebeth Lynge; Mona Saraiya; Nereo Segnan; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; Preetha Rajaraman; Edward Trimble; Stephen Taplin; G K Rath; Ravi Mehrotra
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Understanding linkage to biopsy and treatment for breast cancer after a high-risk telemammography result in Peru: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Jerome T Galea; Renato A Errea; Patricia J Garcia; Molly F Franke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Cancer registries in Europe-going forward is the only option.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Forsea
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2016-05-12

5.  Colorectal and interval cancers of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in the Basque Country (Spain).

Authors:  Isabel Portillo; Eunate Arana-Arri; Isabel Idigoras; Isabel Bilbao; Lorea Martínez-Indart; Luis Bujanda; Iñaki Gutierrez-Ibarluzea
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  The role and utility of population-based cancer registries in cervical cancer surveillance and control.

Authors:  Marion Piñeros; Mona Saraiya; Iacopo Baussano; Maxime Bonjour; Ann Chao; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 7.  Colorectal cancer screening: the time to act is now.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Christian Stock; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Evaluation of the colorectal cancer screening Programme in the Basque Country (Spain) and its effectiveness based on the Miscan-colon model.

Authors:  I Idigoras; A Arrospide; I Portillo; E Arana-Arri; L Martínez-Indart; J Mar; H J de Koning; R Lastra; M Soto-Gordoa; M van der Meulen; I Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Level and Factors Associated with Participation in Population-Based Cancer Screening in Safranbolu District of Karabuk, Turkey.

Authors:  Raziye Özdemir; Fatma TÜrkmen Çevik; Duygu Kes; Merve Karacali; Simge ÖzgÜner
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.429

10.  Assessing Knowledge Sharing in Cancer Screening Among High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries: Insights From the International Cancer Screening Network.

Authors:  Douglas M Puricelli Perin; Amanda L Vogel; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.