Literature DB >> 25483408

Hippocampus, delay discounting, and vicarious trial-and-error.

David Bett1, Lauren H Murdoch, Emma R Wood, Paul A Dudchenko.   

Abstract

In decision-making, an immediate reward is usually preferred to a delayed reward, even if the latter is larger. We tested whether the hippocampus is necessary for this form of temporal discounting, and for vicarious trial-and-error at the decision point. Rats were trained on a recently developed, adjustable delay-discounting task (Papale et al. (2012) Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 12:513-526), which featured a choice between a small, nearly immediate reward, and a larger, delayed reward. Rats then received either hippocampus or sham lesions. Animals with hippocampus lesions adjusted the delay for the larger reward to a level similar to that of sham-lesioned animals, suggesting a similar valuation capacity. However, the hippocampus lesion group spent significantly longer investigating the small and large rewards in the first part of the sessions, and were less sensitive to changes in the amount of reward in the large reward maze arm. Both sham- and hippocampus-lesioned rats showed a greater amount of vicarious trial-and-error on trials in which the delay was adjusted. In a nonadjusting version of the delay discounting task, animals with hippocampus lesions showed more variability in their preference for a larger reward that was delayed by 10 s compared with sham-lesioned animals. To verify the lesion behaviorally, rat were subsequently trained on a water maze task, and rats with hippocampus lesions were significantly impaired compared with sham-lesioned animals. The findings on the delay discounting tasks suggest that damage to the hippocampus may impair the detection of reward magnitude.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  T-maze; decision making; learning; reward; temporal discounting

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25483408     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  10 in total

Review 1.  A framework for understanding and advancing intertemporal choice research using rodent models.

Authors:  Wambura C Fobbs; Sheri J Y Mizumori
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Neural signatures underlying deliberation in human foraging decisions.

Authors:  Samantha V Abram; Michael Hanke; A David Redish; Angus W MacDonald
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Vicarious trial and error.

Authors:  A David Redish
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Interplay between Hippocampal Sharp-Wave-Ripple Events and Vicarious Trial and Error Behaviors in Decision Making.

Authors:  Andrew E Papale; Mark C Zielinski; Loren M Frank; Shantanu P Jadhav; A David Redish
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Over the river, through the woods: cognitive maps in the hippocampus and orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Andrew M Wikenheiser; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Temporal discounting when outcomes are experienced in the moment: Validation of a novel paradigm and comparison with a classic hypothetical intertemporal choice task.

Authors:  Virginie M Patt; Renee Hunsberger; Dominoe A Jones; Margaret M Keane; Mieke Verfaellie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Post-training Inactivation of the Anterior Thalamic Nuclei Impairs Spatial Performance on the Radial Arm Maze.

Authors:  Ryan E Harvey; Shannon M Thompson; Lilliana M Sanchez; Ryan M Yoder; Benjamin J Clark
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Selective Functional Interaction Between the Lateral Habenula and Hippocampus During Different Tests of Response Flexibility.

Authors:  Phillip M Baker; Yingxue Rao; Zeena M G Rivera; Esteli M Garcia; Sheri J Y Mizumori
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 5.639

9.  Striatal Activity and Reward Relativity: Neural Signals Encoding Dynamic Outcome Valuation.

Authors:  Emily S Webber; David E Mankin; Howard C Cromwell
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-11-01

10.  Human Vicarious Trial and Error Is Predictive of Spatial Navigation Performance.

Authors:  Diogo Santos-Pata; Paul F M J Verschure
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.558

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.