Literature DB >> 25483204

Superficial shoulder muscle co-activations during lifting tasks: Influence of lifting height, weight and phase.

Y Blache1, F Dal Maso2, L Desmoulins2, A Plamondon3, M Begon4.   

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the level of co-activation of the superficial shoulder muscles during lifting movement. Boxes containing three different loads (6, 12, and 18 kg) were lifted by fourteen subjects from the waist to shoulder or eye level. The 3D kinematics and electromyograms of the three deltoids, latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major were recorded. A musculoskeletal model was used to determine direction of the moment arm of these muscles. Finally an index of muscle co-activation named the muscle focus was used to evaluate the effects of lifting height, weight lifted and phase (pulling, lifting and dropping phases) on superficial shoulder muscle coactivation. The muscle focus was lower (more co-contraction) during the dropping phase compared to the two other phases (-13%, p<0.001). This was explained by greater muscle activations and by a change in the direction of the muscle moment arm as a function of glenohumeral joint position. Consequently, the function of the shoulder superficial muscles varied with respect to the glenohumeral joint position. To increase the superficial muscle coactivation during the dropping phase may be a solution to increase glenohumeral joint stiffness.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-contraction; Electromyography; Glenohumeral joint; Moment arm; Muscle focus

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25483204     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  5 in total

1.  Model-Based Comparison of Passive and Active Assistance Designs in an Occupational Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Lifting.

Authors:  Xianlian Zhou; Liying Zheng
Journal:  IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors       Date:  2021-07-26

2.  Co-contraction characteristics of lumbar muscles in patients with lumbar disc herniation during different types of movement.

Authors:  Wenjing Du; Huihui Li; Olatunji Mumini Omisore; Lei Wang; Wenmin Chen; Xiangjun Sun
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.819

3.  Muscle function in glenohumeral joint stability during lifting task.

Authors:  Yoann Blache; Mickaël Begon; Benjamin Michaud; Landry Desmoulins; Paul Allard; Fabien Dal Maso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effect of Ambient Oxygen Content, Safety Shoe Type, and Lifting Frequency on Subject's MAWL and Physiological Responses.

Authors:  Atef M Ghaleb; Mohamed Z Ramadan; Ahmed Badwelan; Khalid Saad Aljaloud
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The Importance of Lifting Height and Load Mass for Muscular Workload during Supermarket Stocking: Cross-Sectional Field Study.

Authors:  Sebastian Venge Skovlund; Rúni Bláfoss; Sebastian Skals; Markus Due Jakobsen; Lars Louis Andersen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.