Literature DB >> 25483001

Ministernotomy versus full sternotomy aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: a multicenter study.

Magnus Dalén1, Fausto Biancari2, Antonino S Rubino3, Giuseppe Santarpino4, Herbert De Praetere5, Keiichiro Kasama5, Tatu Juvonen2, Wanda Deste3, Francesco Pollari4, Bart Meuris5, Theodor Fischlein4, Carmelo Mignosa3, Giuseppe Gatti6, Aniello Pappalardo6, Ulrik Sartipy7, Peter Svenarud7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze early postoperative outcomes and 2-year survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the sutureless Perceval bioprosthesis (Sorin Biomedica Cardio Srl, Salluggia, Italy) performed through ministernotomy compared with full sternotomy.
METHODS: This was a study of 267 consecutive patients who underwent isolated AVR with the sutureless Perceval bioprosthesis between 2007 and 2014 at 6 European centers. Of these, 189 (70.8%) were performed through ministernotomy and 78 through a full sternotomy. Propensity score matching was used to reduce selection bias.
RESULTS: In the overall cohort of ministernotomy and full sternotomy patients, in-hospital mortality was 1.1% and 2.6% and 2-year survival was 92% and 91%, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in 56 pairs with similar characteristics and operative risk. Aortic cross-clamp (44 minutes in both groups, p = 0.931) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (69 vs 74 minutes, p = 0.363) did not differ between the groups. Apart from higher values in the ministernotomy group for postoperative peak gradients (28.1 vs 23.3 mm Hg, p = 0.026) and mean aortic valve gradients (15.2 vs 11.7 mm Hg, p = 0.011), early postoperative outcomes did not differ in the propensity-matched cohort. There were no differences in the in-hospital mortality rate or 2-year survival between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: AVR with the sutureless Perceval bioprosthesis through a ministernotomy was a safe and reproducible procedure that was not associated with prolonged aortic cross-clamp or cardiopulmonary bypass time compared with a full sternotomy. Early postoperative outcomes and 2-year survival were comparable between patients undergoing ministernotomy and full sternotomy.
Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25483001     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.08.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  10 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac surgery 2014 reviewed.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Constanze Strüning; Alexandros Moschovas; David Gonzalez-Lopez; Ilija Valchanov; Hristo Kirov; Mahmoud Diab; Gloria Faerber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Bilal H Kirmani; Sion G Jones; S C Malaisrie; Darryl A Chung; Richard Jnn Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-10

3.  Long-term outcomes of sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael L Williams; Campbell D Flynn; Andrew A Mamo; David H Tian; Utz Kappert; Manuel Wilbring; Thierry Folliguet; Antonio Fiore; Antonio Miceli; Augusto D'Onofrio; Giorgia Cibin; Gino Gerosa; Mattia Glauber; Theodor Fischlein; Francesco Pollari
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-07

4.  Aortic valve replacement using stented or sutureless/rapid deployment prosthesis via either full-sternotomy or a minimally invasive approach: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kei Woldendorp; Mathew P Doyle; Paul G Bannon; Martin Misfeld; Tristan D Yan; Giuseppe Santarpino; Paolo Berretta; Marco Di Eusanio; Bart Meuris; Alfredo Giuseppe Cerillo; Pierluigi Stefàno; Niccolò Marchionni; Jacqueline K Olive; Tom C Nguyen; Marco Solinas; Giacomo Bianchi
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-09

5.  Comparing quality of life and postoperative pain after limited access and conventional aortic valve replacement: Design and rationale of the LImited access aortic valve replacement (LIAR) trial.

Authors:  Idserd D G Klop; Bart P van Putte; Geoffrey T L Kloppenburg; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Pythia T Nieuwkerk; Patrick Klein
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2021-01-12

6.  Converging rapid deployment prostheses with minimal access surgery: analysis of early outcomes.

Authors:  M Yousuf Salmasi; Kristo Papa; David Mozalbat; Muhammad Ashraf; Alicja Zientara; Ishaan Chauhan; Nikoleta Karadatkou; Thanos Athanasiou; Isabelle Roussin; Cesare Quarto; George Asimakopoulos
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  International Expert Consensus on Sutureless and Rapid Deployment Valves in Aortic Valve Replacement Using Minimally Invasive Approaches.

Authors:  Mattia Glauber; Simon C Moten; Eugenio Quaini; Marco Solinas; Thierry A Folliguet; Bart Meuris; Antonio Miceli; Peter J Oberwalder; Manfredo Rambaldini; Kevin H T Teoh; Gopal Bhatnagar; Michael A Borger; Denis Bouchard; Olivier Bouchot; Stephen C Clark; Otto E Dapunt; Matteo Ferrarini; Theodor J M Fischlein; Guenther Laufer; Carmelo Mignosa; Russell Millner; Philippe Noirhomme; Steffen Pfeiffer; Xavier Ruyra-Baliarda; Malakh Lal Shrestha; Rakesh M Suri; Giovanni Troise; Borut Gersak
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2016 May-Jun

8.  Rapid deployment valve system shortens operative times for aortic valve replacement through right anterior minithoracotomy.

Authors:  Constanze Bening; Khaled Hamouda; Mehmet Oezkur; Christoph Schimmer; Ina Schade; Armin Gorski; Ivan Aleksic; Rainer Leyh
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Prognosis after surgical replacement with a bioprosthetic aortic valve in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis: systematic review of observational studies.

Authors:  Farid Foroutan; Gordon H Guyatt; Kathleen O'Brien; Eva Bain; Madeleine Stein; Sai Bhagra; Daegan Sit; Rakhshan Kamran; Yaping Chang; Tahira Devji; Hassan Mir; Veena Manja; Toni Schofield; Reed A Siemieniuk; Thomas Agoritsas; Rodrigo Bagur; Catherine M Otto; Per O Vandvik
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-09-28

10.  Outcomes comparison of different surgical strategies for the management of severe aortic valve stenosis: study protocol of a prospective multicentre European registry (E-AVR registry).

Authors:  Francesco Onorati; Riccardo Gherli; Giovanni Mariscalco; Evaldas Girdauskas; Eduardo Quintana; Francesco Santini; Marisa De Feo; Sandro Sponga; Piergiorgio Tozzi; Mohamad Bashir; Andrea Perrotti; Aniello Pappalardo; Vito Giovanni Ruggieri; Giuseppe Santarpino; Mauro Rinaldi; Silva Ronaldo; Francesco Nicolini
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.