Literature DB >> 25482300

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein complements plasma Epstein-Barr virus deoxyribonucleic acid prognostication in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a large-scale retrospective and prospective cohort study.

Lin-Quan Tang1, Chao-Feng Li2, Qiu-Yan Chen1, Lu Zhang1, Xiao-Ping Lai3, Yun He3, Yun-Xiu-Xiu Xu3, Dong-Peng Hu3, Shi-Hua Wen3, Yu-Tuan Peng3, Wen-Hui Chen4, Huai Liu1, Shan-Shan Guo1, Li-Ting Liu1, Jing Li4, Jing-Ping Zhang5, Ling Guo1, Chong Zhao1, Ka-Jia Cao1, Chao-Nan Qian1, Yi-Xin Zeng4, Xiang Guo1, Hai-Qiang Mai1, Mu-Sheng Zeng6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of combining the assessment of circulating high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) with that of Epstein-Barr virus DNA (EBV DNA) in the pretherapy prognostication of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three independent cohorts of NPC patients (training set of n=3113, internal validation set of n=1556, and prospective validation set of n=1668) were studied. Determinants of disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were assessed by multivariate analysis. Hazard ratios and survival probabilities of the patient groups, segregated by clinical stage (T1-2N0-1M0, T3-4N0-1M0, T1-2N2-3M0, and T3-4N2-3M0) and EBV DNA load (low or high) alone, and also according to hs-CRP level (low or high), were compared.
RESULTS: Elevated hs-CRP and EBV DNA levels were significantly correlated with poor disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival in both the training and validation sets. Associations were similar and remained significant after excluding patients with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and chronic hepatitis B. Patients with advanced-stage disease were segregated by high EBV DNA levels and high hs-CRP level into a poorest-risk group, and participants with either high EBV DNA but low hs-CRP level or high hs-CRP but low EBV DNA values had poorer survival compared with the bottom values for both biomarkers. These findings demonstrate a significant improvement in the prognostic ability of conventional advanced NPC staging.
CONCLUSION: Baseline plasma EBV DNA and serum hs-CRP levels were significantly correlated with survival in NPC patients. The combined interpretation of EBV DNA with hs-CRP levels led to refinement of the risks for the patient subsets, with improved risk discrimination in patients with advanced-stage disease.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25482300     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  20 in total

1.  Construction and validation of a biochemical signature to predict the prognosis and the benefit of induction chemotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Xue-Song Sun; Sai-Lan Liu; Si-Yi Xie; Rui Sun; Dong-Hua Luo; Qiu-Yan Chen; Hai-Qiang Mai
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Prognostic Value of Oral Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Load in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yong-Qiao He; Ting Zhou; Da-Wei Yang; Yi-Jing Jia; Lei-Lei Yuan; Wen-Li Zhang; Tong-Min Wang; Ying Liao; Wen-Qiong Xue; Jiang-Bo Zhang; Xiao-Hui Zheng; Xi-Zhao Li; Pei-Fen Zhang; Shao-Dan Zhang; Ye-Zhu Hu; Fang Wang; William C Cho; Jun Ma; Ying Sun; Wei-Hua Jia
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-01-13

Review 3.  The clinical utility of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA assays in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the dawn of a new era?: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 7836 cases.

Authors:  Wenna Zhang; Yupei Chen; Lei Chen; Rui Guo; Guanqun Zhou; Linglong Tang; Yanping Mao; Wenfei Li; Xu Liu; Xiaojing Du; Ying Sun; Jun Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 4.  Epstein-Barr virus DNA level as a novel prognostic factor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Chi Shu; Yanlin Song; Qingfang Li; Jingwen Huang; Xuelei Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 5.  Prognostic significance of pretreated serum lactate dehydrogenase level in nasopharyngeal carcinoma among Chinese population: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mingwei Zhang; Shushan Wei; Li Su; Wenlong Lv; Jinsheng Hong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  EBV based cancer prevention and therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ya Cao
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2017-05-15

7.  Prognostic and Predictive Value of Circulating Inflammation Signature in Non-Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Potential Role for Individualized Induction Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Lv; Wang-Zhong Li; Hu Liang; Guo-Ying Liu; Wei-Xiong Xia; Yan-Qun Xiang
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2021-05-25

8.  Prognostic significance of a combined and controlled nutritional status score and EBV-DNA in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Hui Lu; Shanshan Guo; Liting Liu; Qiuyan Chen; Yujing Liang; Sailan Liu; Xuesong Sun; Qingnan Tang; Xiaoyun Li; Ling Guo; Haoyuan Mo; Linquan Tang; Haiqiang Mai
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.347

9.  Prognostic Value of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA for Local and Regionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Cisplatin-Based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Era.

Authors:  Wen-Hui Chen; Lin-Quan Tang; Shan-Shan Guo; Qiu-Yan Chen; Lu Zhang; Li-Ting Liu; Chao-Nan Qian; Xiang Guo; Dan Xie; Mu-Sheng Zeng; Hai-Qiang Mai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Prognostic Model of Death and Distant Metastasis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Receiving 3DCRT/IMRT in Nonendemic Area of China.

Authors:  Jian Zang; Chen Li; Li-Na Zhao; Jian-Hua Wang; Man Xu; Shan-Quan Luo; Ying J Hitchcock; Mei Shi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.