Helena Temkin-Greener1, Susan Ladwig2, Tom Caprio2, Sally Norton3, Timothy Quill2, Tobie Olsan3, Xueya Cai4, Dana B Mukamel5. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY. Electronic address: Helena_Temkin-Greener@urmc.rochester.edu. 2. Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY. 3. University of Rochester, School of Nursing, Rochester, NY. 4. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY. 5. Department of Medicine, Health Policy and Research Center, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Lack of nursing home (NH)-specific palliative care practice guidelines has been identified as a barrier to improving palliative and end-of-life (EOL) quality of care. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to (1) assess which of the guidelines developed by the National Consensus Project, and the corresponding preferred care practices endorsed by the National Quality Forum, are important and feasible to implement in NHs; and (2) identify the operational standards for palliative care teams in NHs. METHODS: Two-round mail Delphi study. Based on the existing literature, a set of 7 domains with associated 22 palliative practice guidelines was drafted. We invited 48 NH leaders, including clinicians, to review the importance (10-point Likert scale) and the feasibility (5-point Likert scale) of these guidelines. Participants were also asked about palliative care team composition rounding frequency. RESULTS: The response rate to both rounds was 85%. With regard to importance, the mean rating for all guidelines was 8 or higher (ie, highly important), but there was variability in agreement with regard to 5 of the guidelines. The same 5 guidelines were also considered more difficult to implement (eg, costly, unrealistic). Overall, 17 palliative care guidelines were identified for use by NH palliative care teams. Five disciplines (social work, certified nurse assistant, nurse, physician, and nurse practitioner or physician assistant) were identified as comprising a core team and 3 were proposed as extended or ad hoc members. CONCLUSION: The palliative care guidelines and team standards identified in this study may be helpful in providing practical direction to NH administrators and staff looking to improve palliative care practice for their residents.
CONTEXT: Lack of nursing home (NH)-specific palliative care practice guidelines has been identified as a barrier to improving palliative and end-of-life (EOL) quality of care. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to (1) assess which of the guidelines developed by the National Consensus Project, and the corresponding preferred care practices endorsed by the National Quality Forum, are important and feasible to implement in NHs; and (2) identify the operational standards for palliative care teams in NHs. METHODS: Two-round mail Delphi study. Based on the existing literature, a set of 7 domains with associated 22 palliative practice guidelines was drafted. We invited 48 NH leaders, including clinicians, to review the importance (10-point Likert scale) and the feasibility (5-point Likert scale) of these guidelines. Participants were also asked about palliative care team composition rounding frequency. RESULTS: The response rate to both rounds was 85%. With regard to importance, the mean rating for all guidelines was 8 or higher (ie, highly important), but there was variability in agreement with regard to 5 of the guidelines. The same 5 guidelines were also considered more difficult to implement (eg, costly, unrealistic). Overall, 17 palliative care guidelines were identified for use by NH palliative care teams. Five disciplines (social work, certified nurse assistant, nurse, physician, and nurse practitioner or physician assistant) were identified as comprising a core team and 3 were proposed as extended or ad hoc members. CONCLUSION: The palliative care guidelines and team standards identified in this study may be helpful in providing practical direction to NH administrators and staff looking to improve palliative care practice for their residents.
Authors: J Zanker; D Scott; E M Reijnierse; S L Brennan-Olsen; R M Daly; C M Girgis; M Grossmann; A Hayes; T Henwood; V Hirani; C A Inderjeeth; S Iuliano; J W L Keogh; J R Lewis; A B Maier; J A Pasco; S Phu; K M Sanders; M Sim; R Visvanathan; D L Waters; S C Y Yu; G Duque Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2019 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Kathleen T Unroe; Brittany Bernard; Timothy E Stump; Wanzhu Tu; Christopher M Callahan Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Mary Ersek; Kathleen T Unroe; Joan G Carpenter; John G Cagle; Caroline E Stephens; David G Stevenson Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Joan G Carpenter; Laura C Hanson; Nancy Hodgson; Andrew Murray; Daniel S Hippe; Nayak L Polissar; Mary Ersek Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2021-07-26
Authors: Anne B Wichmann; Eddy M M Adang; Kris C P Vissers; Katarzyna Szczerbińska; Marika Kylänen; Sheila Payne; Giovanni Gambassi; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Tinne Smets; Lieve Van den Block; Luc Deliens; Myrra J F J Vernooij-Dassen; Yvonne Engels Journal: BMC Med Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Helen Yue-Lai Chan; Cecilia Nim-Chee Chan; Chui-Wah Man; Alice Dik-Wah Chiu; Faith Chun-Fong Liu; Edward Man-Fuk Leung Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 3.390