Literature DB >> 25481002

Improving ideomotor limb apraxia by electrical stimulation of the left posterior parietal cortex.

Nadia Bolognini1, Silvia Convento2, Elisabetta Banco3, Flavia Mattioli4, Luigi Tesio5, Giuseppe Vallar6.   

Abstract

Limb apraxia, a deficit of planning voluntary gestures, is most frequently caused by damage to the left hemisphere, where, according to an influential neurofunctional model, gestures are planned, before being executed through the motor cortex of the hemisphere contralateral to the acting hand. We used anodal transcranial direct current stimulation delivered to the left posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the right motor cortex (M1), and a sham stimulation condition, to modulate the ability of six left-brain-damaged patients with ideomotor apraxia, and six healthy control subjects, to imitate hand gestures, and to perform skilled hand movements using the left hand. Transcranial direct current stimulation delivered to the left PPC reduced the time required to perform skilled movements, and planning, but not execution, times in imitating gestures, in both patients and controls. In patients, the amount of decrease of planning times brought about by left PPC transcranial direct current stimulation was influenced by the size of the parietal lobe damage, with a larger parietal damage being associated with a smaller improvement. Of interest from a clinical perspective, left PPC stimulation also ameliorated accuracy in imitating hand gestures in patients. Instead, transcranial direct current stimulation to the right M1 diminished execution, but not planning, times in both patients and healthy controls. In conclusion, by using a transcranial stimulation approach, we temporarily improved ideomotor apraxia in the left hand of left-brain-damaged patients, showing a role of the left PPC in planning gestures. This evidence opens up novel perspectives for the use of transcranial direct current stimulation in the rehabilitation of limb apraxia.
© The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apraxia; motor cortex; parietal lobe; stroke rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25481002     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awu343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Networks involved in motor cognition : Physiology and pathophysiology of apraxia].

Authors:  M Martin; J Hermsdörfer; S Bohlhalter; P H Weiss
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Hand-independent representation of tool-use pantomimes in the left anterior intraparietal cortex.

Authors:  Kenji Ogawa; Fumihito Imai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Limb apraxia and the left parietal lobe.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Jennifer Randerath
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

4.  Nonverbal communication remains untouched: No beneficial effect of symptomatic improvement on poor gesture performance in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Florian Wüthrich; Anastasia Pavlidou; Katharina Stegmayer; Sarah Eisenhardt; Jeanne Moor; Lea Schäppi; Tim Vanbellingen; Stephan Bohlhalter; Sebastian Walther
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  Limb Apraxia: a Disorder of Learned Skilled Movement.

Authors:  Anne L Foundas; E Susan Duncan
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 6.  The sensory side of post-stroke motor rehabilitation.

Authors:  Nadia Bolognini; Cristina Russo; Dylan J Edwards
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Individual differences in neuroanatomy and neurophysiology predict effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; Kevin T Jones; Avery E Ostrand; Wan-Yu Hsu; Richard Campusano; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 9.184

Review 8.  The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies.

Authors:  Lucia M Li; Kazumasa Uehara; Takashi Hanakawa
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 5.505

Review 9.  Moving Forward by Stimulating the Brain: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-Stroke Hemiparesis.

Authors:  Heather T Peters; Dylan J Edwards; Susan Wortman-Jutt; Stephen J Page
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Limb-Kinetic Apraxia in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Jung E Park
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.077

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.