Literature DB >> 25480619

Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection under steady pressure automatically controlled endoscopy (SPACE); a multicenter randomized preclinical trial.

Takuya Yamada1, Masashi Hirota, Shusaku Tsutsui, Motohiko Kato, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Kazuhiro Yasuda, Kazuki Sumiyama, Masahiko Tsujii, Tetsuo Takehara, Masaki Mori, Yuichiro Doki, Kiyokazu Nakajima.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Steady pressure automatically controlled endoscopy (SPACE) is a new modality that eliminates on-demand insufflation but enables automatic insufflation in the gastrointestinal tract. Though its use in porcine esophageal ESD was reported to be promising, its applicability and potential effectiveness to gastric procedures have not been evaluated.
OBJECTIVE: The aims were (1) to evaluate feasibility and safety of SPACE in the stomach, and (2) to assess its potential advantages over conventional endoscopy in preventing "blind insufflation"-related complications.
DESIGN: A multicenter randomized preclinical animal study.
SETTING: Laboratories at three universities.
INTERVENTIONS: Experiment 1: Gastric ESD was attempted in the swine (n = 17), under either SPACE or manual insufflation. Experiment 2: Gastroscopy was performed for 10 min in the perforated stomach (n = 10) under either SPACE or manual insufflation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Experiment 1: ESD time, energy device activation time, number of forceps exchanges, specimen size, en block resection rate, vital signs and any intraoperative adverse events. Experiment 2: Intra-gastric and intra-abdominal pressures, vital signs, and any adverse events.
RESULTS: Experiment 1: Gastric ESD was completed in all animals. ESD time tended to be shorter in SPACE than in the control, though the difference was not significant (p = 0.18). Experiment 2: Although both intra-gastric and intra-abdominal pressures remained within preset values in SPACE, they showed excessive elevation in control. LIMITATIONS: An animal study with small sample size.
CONCLUSIONS: SPACE is feasible and safe for complicated and lengthy procedures such as gastric ESD, and is potentially effective in preventing serious consequences related to excessive blind insufflation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25480619     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-4001-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  8 in total

1.  Current limitations in endoscopic CO₂ insufflation for NOTES: flow and pressure study.

Authors:  Kiyokazu Nakajima; Toshirou Nishida; Jeffrey W Milsom; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yoshihito Souma; Yasuaki Miyazaki; Hideki Iijima; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Esophageal submucosal dissection under steady pressure automatically controlled endoscopy (SPACE): a randomized preclinical trial.

Authors:  K Nakajima; J H Moon; S Tsutsui; Y Miyazaki; M Yamasaki; T Yamada; M Kato; K Yasuda; K Sumiyama; N Yahagi; Y Saida; H Kondo; T Nishida; M Mori; Y Doki
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  On-demand endoscopic CO2 insufflation with feedback pressure regulation during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy induces minimal hemodynamic and respiratory changes.

Authors:  Ricard Navarro-Ripoll; Graciela Martínez-Pallí; Carlos Guarner-Argente; Henry Córdova; Maria Angels Martínez-Zamora; Jaume Comas; Cristina Rodríguez de Miguel; Mireia Beltrán; Antonio Rodríguez-D'Jesús; Clara Hernández-Cera; Josep Llach; Jaume Balust; Glòria Fernández-Esparrach
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: results and degrees of technical difficulty as well as success.

Authors:  A Imagawa; H Okada; Y Kawahara; R Takenaka; J Kato; H Kawamoto; S Fujiki; R Takata; T Yoshino; Y Shiratori
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Comparison of intraabdominal pressures using the gastroscope and laparoscope for transgastric surgery.

Authors:  O Meireles; S V Kantsevoy; A N Kalloo; S B Jagannath; S A Giday; P Magno; S P Shih; E J Hanly; C-W Ko; D M Beitler; M R Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Effect of pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamics and inspiratory pressures during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): an experimental, controlled study in an acute porcine model.

Authors:  S von Delius; W Huber; H Feussner; D Wilhelm; A Karagianni; J Henke; A Preissel; A Schneider; R M Schmid; A Meining
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study.

Authors:  Ii-Kwun Chung; Jun Haeng Lee; Suck-Ho Lee; Sun-Joo Kim; Joo Young Cho; Won Young Cho; Young Hwangbo; Bo Ra Keum; Jong Jae Park; Hoon-Jai Chun; Hoi Jin Kim; Jae J Kim; Sam-Ryong Ji; Sang Young Seol
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  A reliable method for monitoring intraabdominal pressure during natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  M F McGee; M J Rosen; J Marks; A Chak; R Onders; A Faulx; A Ignagni; S Schomisch; J Ponsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.453

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy under steady pressure automatically controlled endoscopy: First clinical series.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Imaeda; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Naoki Hosoe; Masanori Nakahara; Shinichiro Zushi; Motohiko Kato; Kazuhiro Kashiwagi; Yasushi Matsumoto; Kayoko Kimura; Rieko Nakamura; Norihito Wada; Masahiko Tsujii; Naohisa Yahagi; Toshifumi Hibi; Takanori Kanai; Tetsuo Takehara; Haruhiko Ogata
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-02-10

2.  Intra-abdominal pressure during endoscopic full-thickness resection comparing manual and automatic control insufflation: a block-randomized porcine study.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kamba; Masakuni Kobayashi; Akio Koizumi; Shingo Ono; Yuko Hara; Nana Shimamoto; Hiroaki Matsui; Hiroto Furuhashi; Tomohiko Richard Ohya; Naoto Tamai; Masako Nishikawa; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Kazuki Sumiyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Gas leakages from gastrointestinal endoscopy system-its visualization and semi-quantification utilizing schlieren optical system in the swine models.

Authors:  Tomo Ishida; Yoshinori Hayashi; Takuro Saito; Kazuyoshi Yamamoto; Kotarou Yamashita; Koji Tanaka; Tomoki Makino; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Yuichiro Doki; Kiyokazu Nakajima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  The endoluminal pressures during flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Yuki Ushimaru; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Masashi Hirota; Yasuaki Miyazaki; Kotaro Yamashita; Takuro Saito; Koji Tanaka; Tomoki Makino; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Makoto Yamasaki; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.