PURPOSE: The outcome of cyclosporin A (CSA) alone (n = 19) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was compared to that of CSA combined with methotrexate (MTX) (n = 43) in children with acute leukemia who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. METHODS: All respective donors were HLA-identical siblings. All patients received CSA at a dose of 3 mg/kg/day starting on day -1. A CSA level of 80-130 ng/ml was aimed for. The 43 patients in the historical control were given an additional 10 mg/m(2) dosage of MTX on days 1, 3, 6, and 11. RESULTS: Patients who received CSA alone had a significantly reduced cumulative incidence of relapse (5 vs. 40 %; p = 0.002), a significantly increased 5-year event-free survival (84 vs. 35 %; p = 0.001), and a significantly increased 5-year overall survival (84 vs. 42 %; p = 0.004). The incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV and chronic GVHD in patients in the CSA group was equivalent to the CSA+MTX group (26 vs. 19 %; p = 0.440, and 32 vs. 23 %; p = 0.428). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, post-transplant immunosuppression consisting of CSA alone is well tolerated and may contribute to a superior outcome.
PURPOSE: The outcome of cyclosporin A (CSA) alone (n = 19) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was compared to that of CSA combined with methotrexate (MTX) (n = 43) in children with acute leukemia who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. METHODS: All respective donors were HLA-identical siblings. All patients received CSA at a dose of 3 mg/kg/day starting on day -1. A CSA level of 80-130 ng/ml was aimed for. The 43 patients in the historical control were given an additional 10 mg/m(2) dosage of MTX on days 1, 3, 6, and 11. RESULTS:Patients who received CSA alone had a significantly reduced cumulative incidence of relapse (5 vs. 40 %; p = 0.002), a significantly increased 5-year event-free survival (84 vs. 35 %; p = 0.001), and a significantly increased 5-year overall survival (84 vs. 42 %; p = 0.004). The incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV and chronic GVHD in patients in the CSA group was equivalent to the CSA+MTX group (26 vs. 19 %; p = 0.440, and 32 vs. 23 %; p = 0.428). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, post-transplant immunosuppression consisting of CSA alone is well tolerated and may contribute to a superior outcome.
Authors: F Locatelli; M Zecca; R Rondelli; F Bonetti; G Dini; A Prete; C Messina; C Uderzo; M Ripaldi; F Porta; G Giorgiani; E Giraldi; A Pession Journal: Blood Date: 2000-03-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: D Weisdorf; R Hakke; B Blazar; W Miller; P McGlave; N Ramsay; J Kersey; A Filipovich Journal: Transplantation Date: 1991-06 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Jian-Ming Li; Cynthia R Giver; Ying Lu; Mohammad S Hossain; Mojtaba Akhtari; Edmund K Waller Journal: Immunotherapy Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 4.196
Authors: F Locatelli; B Bruno; M Zecca; M T Van-Lint; S McCann; W Arcese; S Dallorso; P Di Bartolomeo; F Fagioli; A Locasciulli; M Lawler; A Bacigalupo Journal: Blood Date: 2000-09-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: R Hoyt; D S Ritchie; A W Roberts; L Macgregor; D J Curtis; J Szer; A P Grigg Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: H M Shulman; K M Sullivan; P L Weiden; G B McDonald; G E Striker; G E Sale; R Hackman; M S Tsoi; R Storb; E D Thomas Journal: Am J Med Date: 1980-08 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: N Bleyzac; D Cuzzubbo; C Rénard; N Garnier; V Dubois; C Domenech; M-P Goutagny; A Plesa; N Grardel; S Goutelle; A Janoly-Duménil; Y Bertrand Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Anita Lawitschka; Giovanna Lucchini; Brigitte Strahm; Jean-Hugues Dalle; Adriana Balduzzi; Brenda Gibson; Cristina Diaz De Heredia; Jacek Wachowiak; Arnaud Dalissier; Kim Vettenranta; Isaac Yaniv; Victoria Bordon; Dorothea Bauer; Peter Bader; Roland Meisel; Christina Peters; Selim Corbacioglu Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2020-04-02 Impact factor: 3.782