Literature DB >> 25479802

Absolute assignment of breast cancer intrinsic molecular subtype.

Eric R Paquet1, Michael T Hallett2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Massively parallel gene expression profiling has provided a more objective, molecular-level characterization of breast cancer subtypes. Several bioinformatics tools are available to infer patient subtype from a gene expression profile including the well-studied PAM50. The specific algorithmic methods used in these tools require access to a broad patient dataset. The choice of subtype for an individual is determined relative to all other patients across the panel, making subtypes heavily dependent on the composition of the dataset. Our aim was to develop a bioinformatics approach assigning absolute breast cancer subtypes, independent of dataset composition.
METHODS: Using a dataset of 4924 breast cancer patients, we defined a new bioinformatics approach: Absolute Intrinsic Molecular Subtyping (AIMS) that assigns subtype from a gene expression profile for an individual sample without the need for a large, diverse, and normalized dataset. We evaluated the agreement of AIMS with PAM50 and compared subtype assignment and prognostic value of the subtypes. We assessed AIMS' robustness using a benchmark set of tests including subtype reproducibility between technologies, gene removal, and normal gene expression contamination, and compared it with PAM50. All statistical tests, except where noted, were two-sided.
RESULTS: AIMS vastly agreed with PAM50, with 76% and 77% agreement for cross validation and the test set, respectively, and the prognostic capacity of the intrinsic subtypes was preserved. AIMS is fully stable, and its absolute nature enables its use on a wide range of datasets and technologies, including RNA-seq.
CONCLUSIONS: The instability of a breast cancer subtyping scheme like PAM50 could have important consequences in clinical management of patients. AIMS is a fully stable and robust subtyping scheme that recapitulates PAM50.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25479802     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  61 in total

1.  Digital image analysis outperforms manual biomarker assessment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Gustav Stålhammar; Nelson Fuentes Martinez; Michael Lippert; Nicholas P Tobin; Ida Mølholm; Lorand Kis; Gustaf Rosin; Mattias Rantalainen; Lars Pedersen; Jonas Bergh; Michael Grunkin; Johan Hartman
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Standardized versus research-based PAM50 intrinsic subtyping of breast cancer.

Authors:  A Prat; J S Parker
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Targeting TAZ-Driven Human Breast Cancer by Inhibiting a SKP2-p27 Signaling Axis.

Authors:  He Shen; Nuo Yang; Alexander Truskinovsky; Yanmin Chen; Ashley L Mussell; Norma J Nowak; Lester Kobzik; Costa Frangou; Jianmin Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 5.852

4.  Identifying and Targeting Sporadic Oncogenic Genetic Aberrations in Mouse Models of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Charles J Murphy; Florian A Karreth; Kristina B Emdal; Forest M White; Olivier Elemento; Alex Toker; Gerburg M Wulf; Lewis C Cantley
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 39.397

5.  Genomic characterization of HER2-positive breast cancer and response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy-results from the ACOSOG Z1041 (Alliance) trial.

Authors:  R Lesurf; O L Griffith; M Griffith; J Hundal; L Trani; M A Watson; R Aft; M J Ellis; D Ota; V J Suman; F Meric-Bernstam; A M Leitch; J C Boughey; G Unzeitig; A U Buzdar; K K Hunt; E R Mardis
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Consensus on Molecular Subtypes of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.

Authors:  Gregory M Chen; Lavanya Kannan; Ludwig Geistlinger; Victor Kofia; Zhaleh Safikhani; Deena M A Gendoo; Giovanni Parmigiani; Michael Birrer; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Levi Waldron
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Purity Independent Subtyping of Tumors (PurIST), A Clinically Robust, Single-sample Classifier for Tumor Subtyping in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Naim U Rashid; Xianlu L Peng; Chong Jin; Richard A Moffitt; Keith E Volmar; Brian A Belt; Roheena Z Panni; Timothy M Nywening; Silvia G Herrera; Kristin J Moore; Sarah G Hennessey; Ashley B Morrison; Ryan Kawalerski; Apoorve Nayyar; Audrey E Chang; Benjamin Schmidt; Hong Jin Kim; David C Linehan; Jen Jen Yeh
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Final results of the double-blind placebo-controlled randomized phase 2 LOTUS trial of first-line ipatasertib plus paclitaxel for inoperable locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca Dent; Mafalda Oliveira; Steven J Isakoff; Seock-Ah Im; Marc Espié; Sibel Blau; Antoinette R Tan; Cristina Saura; Matthew J Wongchenko; Na Xu; Denise Bradley; Sarah-Jayne Reilly; Aruna Mani; Sung-Bae Kim
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Heterochromatin-Encoded Satellite RNAs Induce Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Quan Zhu; Nien Hoong; Aaron Aslanian; Toshiro Hara; Christopher Benner; Sven Heinz; Karen H Miga; Eugene Ke; Sachin Verma; Jan Soroczynski; John R Yates; Tony Hunter; Inder M Verma
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Modeling Between-Study Heterogeneity for Improved Replicability in Gene Signature Selection and Clinical Prediction.

Authors:  Naim U Rashid; Quefeng Li; Jen Jen Yeh; Joseph G Ibrahim
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 5.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.