Literature DB >> 25479734

The development of a short domain-general measure of working memory capacity.

Frederick L Oswald1, Samuel T McAbee2, Thomas S Redick3, David Z Hambrick4.   

Abstract

Working memory capacity is one of the most frequently measured individual difference constructs in cognitive psychology and related fields. However, implementation of complex span and other working memory measures is generally time-consuming for administrators and examinees alike. Because researchers often must manage the tension between limited testing time and measuring numerous constructs reliably, a short and effective measure of working memory capacity would often be a major practical benefit in future research efforts. The current study developed a shortened computerized domain-general measure of working memory capacity by representatively sampling items from three existing complex working memory span tasks: operation span, reading span, and symmetry span. Using a large archival data set (Study 1, N = 4,845), we developed and applied a principled strategy for developing the reduced measure, based on testing a series of confirmatory factor analysis models. Adequate fit indices from these models lent support to this strategy. The resulting shortened measure was then administered to a second independent sample (Study 2, N = 172), demonstrating that the new measure saves roughly 15 min (30%) of testing time on average, and even up to 25 min depending on the test-taker. On the basis of these initial promising findings, several directions for future research are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex span tasks; Measurement; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25479734     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0543-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  24 in total

1.  A pilot randomized trial of a dual n-back emotional working memory training program for veterans with elevated PTSD symptoms.

Authors:  Sadie E Larsen; Salahadin Lotfi; Kenneth P Bennett; Christine L Larson; Caron Dean-Bernhoft; Han-Joo Lee
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.222

2.  Rapid eye movement sleep mediates age-related decline in prospective memory consolidation.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Chenlu Gao; Paul Fillmore; R Lynae Roberts; Natalya Pruett; Donald L Bliwise
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  The role of attention in remembering important item-location associations.

Authors:  Alexander L M Siegel; Alan D Castel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-11

4.  The feasibility and acceptability of assessing inhibitory control and working memory among adolescents via an ecological momentary assessment approach.

Authors:  Christopher M Warren; Mary Ann Pentz
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Age differences in specific neural connections within the Default Mode Network underlie theory of mind.

Authors:  Colleen Hughes; Brittany S Cassidy; Joshua Faskowitz; Andrea Avena-Koenigsberger; Olaf Sporns; Anne C Krendl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Selectively Distracted: Divided Attention and Memory for Important Information.

Authors:  Catherine D Middlebrooks; Tyson Kerr; Alan D Castel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-06-12

7.  Inhibition tasks are not associated with a variety of behaviors in college students.

Authors:  Curtis D Von Gunten; Bruce D Bartholow; Jorge S Martins
Journal:  Eur J Pers       Date:  2020-04-01

8.  Are there Sex Differences in Confidence and Metacognitive Monitoring Accuracy for Everyday, Academic, and Psychometrically Measured Spatial Ability?

Authors:  Robert Ariel; Natalie A Lembeck; Scott Moffat; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Intelligence       Date:  2018-08-22

9.  The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.

Authors:  Margaret A Koeritzer; Chad S Rogers; Kristin J Van Engen; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Age differences in neural activity related to mentalizing during person perception.

Authors:  Brittany S Cassidy; Colleen Hughes; Anne C Krendl
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2020-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.