Literature DB >> 25479165

Potential of metal-organic frameworks for separation of xenon and krypton.

Debasis Banerjee1, Amy J Cairns, Jian Liu, Radha K Motkuri, Satish K Nune, Carlos A Fernandez, Rajamani Krishna, Denis M Strachan, Praveen K Thallapally.   

Abstract

CONSPECTUS: The total world energy demand is predicted to rise significantly over the next few decades, primarily driven by the continuous growth of the developing world. With rapid depletion of nonrenewable traditional fossil fuels, which currently account for almost 86% of the worldwide energy output, the search for viable alternative energy resources is becoming more important from a national security and economic development standpoint. Nuclear energy, an emission-free, high-energy-density source produced by means of controlled nuclear fission, is often considered as a clean, affordable alternative to fossil fuel. However, the successful installation of an efficient and economically viable industrial-scale process to properly sequester and mitigate the nuclear-fission-related, highly radioactive waste (e.g., used nuclear fuel (UNF)) is a prerequisite for any further development of nuclear energy in the near future. Reprocessing of UNF is often considered to be a logical way to minimize the volume of high-level radioactive waste, though the generation of volatile radionuclides during reprocessing raises a significant engineering challenge for its successful implementation. The volatile radionuclides include but are not limited to noble gases (predominately isotopes of Xe and Kr) and must be captured during the process to avoid being released into the environment. Currently, energy-intensive cryogenic distillation is the primary means to capture and separate radioactive noble gas isotopes during UNF reprocessing. A similar cryogenic process is implemented during commercial production of noble gases though removal from air. In light of their high commercial values, particularly in lighting and medical industries, and associated high production costs, alternate approaches for Xe/Kr capture and storage are of contemporary research interest. The proposed pathways for Xe/Kr removal and capture can essentially be divided in two categories: selective absorption by dissolution in solvents and physisorption on porous materials. Physisorption-based separation and adsorption on highly functional porous materials are promising alternatives to the energy-intensive cryogenic distillation process, where the adsorbents are characterized by high surface areas and thus high removal capacities and often can be chemically fine-tuned to enhance the adsorbate-adsorbent interactions for optimum selectivity. Several traditional porous adsorbents such as zeolites and activated carbon have been tested for noble gas capture but have shown low capacity, selectivity, and lack of modularity. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) or porous coordination polymers (PCPs) are an emerging class of solid-state adsorbents that can be tailor-made for applications ranging from gas adsorption and separation to catalysis and sensing. Herein we give a concise summary of the background and development of Xe/Kr separation technologies with a focus on UNF reprocessing and the prospects of MOF-based adsorbents for that particular application.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25479165     DOI: 10.1021/ar5003126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  14 in total

1.  The role of molecular modelling and simulation in the discovery and deployment of metal-organic frameworks for gas storage and separation.

Authors:  Arni Sturluson; Melanie T Huynh; Alec R Kaija; Caleb Laird; Sunghyun Yoon; Feier Hou; Zhenxing Feng; Christopher E Wilmer; Yamil J Colón; Yongchul G Chung; Daniel W Siderius; Cory M Simon
Journal:  Mol Simul       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.178

Review 2.  Hydrophobic Metal-Organic Frameworks: Assessment, Construction, and Diverse Applications.

Authors:  Lin-Hua Xie; Ming-Ming Xu; Xiao-Min Liu; Min-Jian Zhao; Jian-Rong Li
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 16.806

3.  An Efficient Synthesis Strategy for Metal-Organic Frameworks: Dry-Gel Synthesis of MOF-74 Framework with High Yield and Improved Performance.

Authors:  Atanu Kumar Das; Rama Sesha Vemuri; Igor Kutnyakov; B Peter McGrail; Radha Kishan Motkuri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Adsorbate-induced lattice deformation in IRMOF-74 series.

Authors:  Sudi Jawahery; Cory M Simon; Efrem Braun; Matthew Witman; Davide Tiana; Bess Vlaisavljevich; Berend Smit
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  Structure-directing effects of ionic liquids in the ionothermal synthesis of metal-organic frameworks.

Authors:  Thomas P Vaid; Steven P Kelley; Robin D Rogers
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.769

6.  Effect of ring rotation upon gas adsorption in SIFSIX-3-M (M = Fe, Ni) pillared square grid networks.

Authors:  Sameh K Elsaidi; Mona H Mohamed; Cory M Simon; Efrem Braun; Tony Pham; Katherine A Forrest; Wenqian Xu; Debasis Banerjee; Brian Space; Michael J Zaworotko; Praveen K Thallapally
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 9.825

Review 7.  Metrics for Evaluation and Screening of Metal-Organic Frameworks for Applications in Mixture Separations.

Authors:  Rajamani Krishna
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-07-10

8.  How Reliable Is the Ideal Adsorbed Solution Theory for the Estimation of Mixture Separation Selectivities in Microporous Crystalline Adsorbents?

Authors:  Rajamani Krishna; Jasper M van Baten
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-06-02

9.  ZIF-Derived Nitrogen-Doped Porous Carbons for Xe Adsorption and Separation.

Authors:  Shan Zhong; Qian Wang; Dapeng Cao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Metal-organic framework with optimally selective xenon adsorption and separation.

Authors:  Debasis Banerjee; Cory M Simon; Anna M Plonka; Radha K Motkuri; Jian Liu; Xianyin Chen; Berend Smit; John B Parise; Maciej Haranczyk; Praveen K Thallapally
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.