Literature DB >> 25478462

Rehabilitation of a total maxillectomy patient by three different methods.

N Vidyasankari1, C Dinesh Kumar2, Neeraj Sharma3, Yogesh S4.   

Abstract

Rehabilitation of a patient with orbital defect is highly a challenging task, requiring an individualized design of the technique for each patient. The disfigurement associated with the loss of facial structures causes significant emotional stress and physical burdens.Various treatment modalities are available, one of which is the use of implants. Although implant-supported orbital prosthesis has a superior outcome, it may not be advisable in all the patients due to economic factors. The treatment of choice includes the silicone orbital prosthesis due to its life-like appearance. This article describes three different techniques, it's advantages and limitations of fabricating a silicone orbital prosthesis for the same patient to achieve ideal fit and aesthetics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Maxillofacial prosthesis; Orbital prosthesis; Retention aids; Silicone; Total maxillectomy

Year:  2014        PMID: 25478462      PMCID: PMC4253280          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9551.4960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  8 in total

1.  Color stability of facial silicone prosthetic polymers after outdoor weathering.

Authors:  G L Polyzois
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient after partial rhinectomy: a clinical report.

Authors:  Shobha Rodrigues; Vidya Kamalaksh Shenoy; Kamalaksh Shenoy
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Diminishing dependence on adhesives for retention of facial prostheses.

Authors:  S M Parel
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Rehabilitation of orbital cavity after total orbital exenteration using oculofacial prostheses anchored by osseointegrated dental implants posed as a one-step surgical procedure.

Authors:  L Konstantinidis; P Scolozzi; M Hamédani
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 0.700

5.  Implant and prosthesis movement after enucleation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Debraj Shome; Santosh G Honavar; Kuldeep Raizada; Deepa Raizada
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Surface modification of an experimental silicone rubber maxillofacial material to improve wettability.

Authors:  Tariq Aziz; Mark Waters; Robert Jagger
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  An algorithmic approach to reconstructive surgery and prosthetic rehabilitation after orbital exenteration.

Authors:  Matthew M Hanasono; Johnson C Lee; Justin S Yang; Roman J Skoracki; Gregory P Reece; Bita Esmaeli
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  A technique for fabrication of an orbital prosthesis: a case report.

Authors:  Ali Hafezeqoran; Rodabeh Koodaryan
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2010-06-24
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Monoscopic photogrammetry to obtain 3D models by a mobile device: a method for making facial prostheses.

Authors:  Rodrigo Salazar-Gamarra; Rosemary Seelaus; Jorge Vicente Lopes da Silva; Airton Moreira da Silva; Luciano Lauria Dib
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-05-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.