Previous reports have shown the deleterious effect of triamcinolone
acetonide (TA) on tendon tissue.To our knowledge, no previous study has assessed how the timing
and dosing of TA injection therapy can be altered to avoid potential
side effects.This study focused on the appropriate dose and interval of TA
administration in an in vitro setting.A 0.1 mg/mL dose of TA had temporary effects on decreasing cell
viability of the human rotator cuff-derived cells and increasing
cell apoptosis at day 7, however, these effects were no longer evident
by day 14 and were recovered by day 21.A 1.0 mg/mL dose of TA resulted in irreversible changes to the
human rotator cuff-derived cells.These results may be helpful in deciding the appropriate dose
and interval of TA injection therapy.This study was performed in an in vitro setting; therefore,
there are significant limitations in assuming that the results can
directly translate into the in vivo setting.
Introduction
Repeated corticosteroid injections are often used in patients
with rotator cuff tendinopathy, trigger finger, and lateral epicondylitis.[1-4] The effectiveness of corticosteroid
injections is due to their anti-inflammatory properties.[5-6] However, the frequent use of corticosteroids may
increase the risk of deterioration of living tissue, and the appropriate
dose and interval of injections are controversial.[7] The therapeutic
use of corticosteroids is a contributing factor in the occurrence
of tendon rupture,[6-8] andseveral
reports have described the detrimental effects of glucocorticoids
on tendon cells. For example, dexamethasone inhibited cell proliferation
and reduced collagen synthesis in primary tendon cells of rat tails.[9] Additionally, an
inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids on tendon cell proliferation
and proteoglycan production has been found both in vitro and in
vivo.[10-12]Triamcinolone acetonide (TA) (Kenacort-A; Bristol-Myers, Tokyo,
Japan), a synthetic analogue of hydrocortisone, is used in the injection
form for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.[13,14] However, many cases of tendon injury
and rupture after TA injections have been reported.[3,15-20] Because
of its poor solubility, TA dissolves slowly in aqueous solutions
and diffuses into tissue and cellular layers. It has been suggested
that this characteristic causes longstanding and deleterious effects.[21] Muto et al[22] reported considerable
deleterious effects of TA with regard to decreases in viability
and apoptosis of human rotator cuff-derived cells. Dean et al[23] conducted a meta-analysis
on the adverse effect of TA in human and animal studies in terms
of collagen synthesis, apoptosis, the expression of matrix metalloproteinase
the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase, and cytokines.[23] They concluded
that the local administration of a glucocorticoid has significant
negative effects on tendon cells in vitro, including
reduced cell viability, cell proliferation and collagen synthesis.Although there are a number of reports on the adverse effects
of corticosteroid administration, several clinical questions remain:
how often and how much TA can cause deleterious effects and what
is the timeframe for potential recovery? To date, there has been
no report on the appropriate dose and interval of TA administration
for the tendon. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the
appropriate dose and interval of TA administration to avoid detrimental
effects in an in vitro setting.
Materials and Methods
Preparation of human rotator cuff-derived
cells
The human rotator cuff-derived cells were isolated from the torn
edges of human supraspinatus tendons, which were procured during
arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff after obtaining informed
consent from the patients (two men aged 61 and 54 years, and one
woman aged 72 years). The protocol of this study was approved by our
institutional review board. The human adult rotator cuff tissues
were transported in a sterile saline solution on ice. The tissue
samples (each weighing approximately 0.3 g) were cut into small
pieces under sterile conditions, followed by digestion for four
hours in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Sigma, St. Louis,
Missouri) supplemented with 30 mg/mL of collagenase II (Gibco, Langley,
Oklahoma) at 37°C, 95% humidity, and 5% CO2. After digestion,
the cells were pelleted, washed in phosphate-buffered saline and
cultured in 75 cm2 cell culture flasks with DMEM supplemented
with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin
(PS) (Sigma) (regular medium). The cultures obtained from each patient
were treated separately. All experiments were performed with cells
from the third passage, and the same passage of cells was used for
each experiment.
Cell culture
TA was diluted with saline to 1.0 and 0.1 mg/mL. The human rotator
cuff-derived cells were cultured in three different media: regular
medium, consisting of DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% PS (control
group); regular medium with 0.1 mg/mL of TA (low TA group); and
regular medium with 1.0 mg/mL of TA (high TA group). The medium
was replaced every three days. The study’s protocol is shown in
Figure 1.Flow chart showing a) the
time course of this study and b) protocol of interval analysis.
IFS, immunofluorescence staining; TA, triamcinolone acetonide; WST,
water-soluble tetrazolium salt assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction
(group 1, 7-day interval; group 2, 14-day interval; group 3, 21-day
interval).
Cell morphology
A total of 5 × 105 cells were seeded onto six-well
plates. Cell morphology was observed using a BZ-8000 confocal microscope
(Keyence, Osaka, Japan) at days 7, 14, and 21.
Cell viability assays
Cell viability was measured by a water-soluble tetrazolium salt
(WST) assay using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan),
as previously described.[24] Using
96-well plates, the 5 × 103 cells were seeded per well,
and 100 μL of medium was added. For the WST assay, each well was
supplemented with 10 μL of WST for three hours at 37°C in a CO2 incubator before
spectrophotometric evaluation. The conversion of the WST to the
formazan assay was spectrophotometrically measured at 450 nm. The
total cell viability of each group was expressed as the fold difference
from the control group at corresponding time points. The cells were exposed
to TA at each dose for 7, 14, and 21 days, followed by replacement
with a regular medium for three days. To analyse the effect of the
re-administration of TA, a 0.1 mg/mL of TA (low dose) was administered
in the same manner at 7, 14, and 21 days after the initial TA treatment
(Fig. 2).Cell morphology showing that exposure
to triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for seven days yielded flattened
and polygonal cells. However, cells in the low TA group had a similar
appearance to the control cells at day 21. In the high TA group,
there was no recovery of appearance after 21 days.
Detection of apoptosis
To detect cell apoptosis, staining was performed at 7, 14 and
21 days after cultivation using the APO-DIRECT Kit (Bay Bioscience,
Kobe, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The nucleus
was stained with diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Fluorescent images
were obtained using a BZ-8000 confocal microscope (Keyence). For
quantitative measurement, the average number of both the apoptotic
cells and the DAPI-positive cells were counted from four rectangular areas
in each well. The percentage of apoptotic cells was expressed as
an average and was calculated as follows: (apoptotic cells/total cells)
× 100.
Quantitative real-time polymerase
chain reaction
We examined the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) to reveal the mechanism of apoptosis in cells treated with
TA at 7 and 21 days. The messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expressions
of caspase 3, 7, 8 and 9 were analysed using quantitative real-time
PCR. The total RNA was extracted from control cells and TA-treated
cells using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California) per the
manufacturer's protocol. Oligo (dT) primed first-strand complementary
deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) was synthesised using a High Capacity
cDNA Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California).
Quantitative real-time PCR was performed in a 20 μl reaction mixture using
the SYBR Green Master Mix reagent (Applied Biosystems) on the ABI
prism 7500 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). The PCR
conditions were as follows: one cycle at 95 °C for ten minutes followed
by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 seconds and at 60 °C for one minute.
Pre-designed primers specific for caspase-3, 7, 8, 9, and β-actin were
obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, California). The primer sequences
were as follows: caspase-3, 5′- TGG TTC ATC CAG TCG CTT TG-3′ (forward)
and 5′- CAT TCT GTT GCC ACC TTT CG-3′ (reverse); caspase-7, 5′-
GAG CGA CGG AGA GAG ACT GT-3′ (forward) and 5′- CCC CTG CTC TTC
AAT ACA GC-3′ (reverse); caspase-8, 5′- GCC TCC CTC AAG TTC CT-3′ (forward)
and 5′- CCT GGA GTC TCT GGA ATA ACA-3′ (reverse); caspase-9, 5′- CGA ACT AAC AGG CAA GCA
GC-3′ (forward) and 5′- ACC TCA CCA AAT CCT CCA GAA C-3′ (reverse);
and β-actin, 5′- GCA AAT TGC TTC TAG GCG GAC TA-3′ (forward) and
5′- CAT CTT GTT TTC TGC GCA AGT T-3′ (reverse). The relative expressions
of caspase-3, 7, 8, and 9 were calculated using the ΔΔ-Ct method,
normalising to β-actin.
Statistical analysis
In all graphs, the mean values and standard deviations (sd) are
provided. Comparisons among the groups were made using the Mann–Whitney U
test or the Steel-Dwass test.[25] P-values
< 0.05 were considered significant. The data were analysed using
StatView (Brainpower, Calabasas, California) and Microsoft Excel
2010 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, Washington).
Results
The cells in the control group showed a spindle-shaped phenotype
at days 7, 14 and 21.In the low TA group, the cells
became flattened and polygonal at day 7 but returned to a spindle
shape at day 14. By day 21, the cells had a similar appearance to
those in the control group. In the high-TA group, the cells also
became flattened and polygonal at day 7. The morphology of the cells did
not return to a normal level at days 14 or 21 (Fig. 2).At day 7 the cell viability was 0.73 (sd 0.06) in the
low TA group and was 0.21 (sd 0.07) in the high TA group
(Fig. 3a). At day 14, the cell viability was 0.92 (sd 0.16)
in the low TA group and 0.36 (sd 0.09) in the high TA group
(Fig. 3b). At day 21, the cell viability was 1.03 (sd 0.15)
in the low TA group and 0.25 (sd 0.13) in the high TA group
(Fig. 3c). Both the low and
high TA groups showed significantly lower cell viability compared
with the control group at days 7 and 14. At day 21, there was no
difference between the control and low TA groups, whereas the high TA
group still demonstrated significantly lower cell viability compared
with the control group.Histograms showing cell viability
at a) day 7: significantly lower in the TA groups than in the control
group. Also, cell viability in the high TA group was significantly
lower than that in the low TA group. b) Day 14: cell viability in
the low TA group had a tendency to recover nearly that of the control
group. Cell viability in the high TA group remained decreased. c)
Day 21: cell viability in the low TA group recovered to the point
in the control.
Apoptotic cell analysis
The apoptotic cells were stained green during immunofluorescence
staining (Fig. 4). In the control group, few apoptotic cells were
seen at days 7, 14 and 21. In the low TA group, a higher number
of apoptotic cells was observed at day 7 compared with that in the control
group. The appearance of apoptotic cells decreased at days 14 and
21 compared with that at day 7. In the high TA group, numerous apoptotic
cells were observed at day 7. At days 14 and 21, the number of apoptotic
cells did not decrease. In the low TA group, the rate of apoptotic
cells was significantly reduced at days 14 and 21 compared with
that at day 7 (day 7: 25.5%, sd 9.3; day 14: 16.8%, sd 5.8
and day 21: 11.6%, sd 5.8). However, in the high TA group,
the rate of apoptotic cells was not reduced at any point (day 7:
37.5, sd 12.2%; day 14: 39.9%, sd 18.6 and day
21: 37.5%, sd 14.6).Immunofluorescence staining showing
apoptotic cells (green). In the control, there were few apoptotic
cells. Apoptosis in the low TA group decreased over time. The expression
of apoptosis was increased in the high TA group, and did not change.
The table shows the ratios of apoptotic cells. In the low TA group,
the rate of apoptotic cells was significantly reduced at days 14
and 21 compared with day 7. However, in the high TA group, there
was no decrease.Quantitative real-time PCR revealed that the mRNA expressions
of caspase-3, 7, 8 and 9 in the TA-treated group were significantly
increased at day 7 compared with those in the control group (p <
0.05; Fig. 5a). All mRNA expressions of caspase were significantly
reduced in the low TA group at day 21 (P < 0.05; Fig. 5b). There was
no decrease in the high TA group at day 21.Graphs showing that real-time PCR
revealed that the mRNA expressions of caspase-3, 7, 8, and 9 in
the TA-treated group were significantly increased at day 7 compared
with a) those in the control group (p < 0.05;). All mRNA expressions
of caspase were significantly reduced in b) the low TA group at
day 21 (p < 0.05;). There was no decrease in high TA group at day
21.
The effect after the re-administration
of TA at different intervals
To determine the appropriate interval of TA administration, the
cells were treated at 7-, 14-, and 21-day intervals after the initial
treatment. Since a TA concentration of 1.0 mg/mL showed irreversible
effects on the cells, re-administration was performed using a concentration
of 0.1 mg/mL at different intervals. At day 21 after the second
TA treatment, the cell viability was analysed. The protocol for
this is shown in Figure 1b. The cell viability was 0.40 (sd 0.04)
in the seven-day interval group (group 1) and was 0.56 (sd 0.04)
in the 14-day interval group (group 2), which was significantly
lower compared with that in the control group (Fig. 6). In the 21-day
interval group (group 3), the cell viability was 0.87 (sd 0.08), which
was not significantly different compared with that in the control
group (Fig. 6).Cell viability (re-administration)
was 39.8% (sd 4.3) in the one-week interval group (group
1) and 56.1% (sd 3.9) in the two-week interval group (group
2), which was significantly lower than that in the control group.
In the three-week interval group (group 3), cell viability was 86.5%
(sd 7.9), and a significant difference was not seen compared
with the control group.
Discussion
This study revealed that recovery from the deleterious effects
of TA was possible, but it was dependent on both the dose and the
interval of administration of TA. In an in vitro study,
the methylprednisolone reduced the biomechanical properties of rotator
cuff tendons.[11] Tempfer et
al[21] showed
that TA caused a decrease in rates of proliferation and in the collagen
synthesis of human tendon cells, triggering a differentiation process
resulting in an increased number of adipocytes and chondrocytes. Wong
et al[26] reported
that TA-suppressed human tenocyte cellular activity and collagen
synthesis. Muto et al[22] reported
that TA affects viability and apoptosis of human rotator cuff-derived
cells. In an in vivo study, Tillander et al[17] reported that
subacromial injections of TA caused damage in rat rotator cuffs.
The fact that TA is a depository drug with prolonged action makes
it beneficial as an anti-inflammatory agent in controlling symptoms
and providing a longer remission effect, which is why TA is widely
used in clinical situations. However, it may also be detrimental
to human rotator cuff tenocytes by prolonging the suppression of
their viability and the promotion of apoptosis.[10] In clinical practice,
there are no widely accepted guidelines for corticosteroid injections
regarding the appropriate dose and intervals.With regard to the dose of corticosteroids, Wong et al[26] reported that
incubation with 0.04 μg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL doses of dexamethasone
for four days reduced cell viability in human tendon cells. Hossain
et al[27] showed
that induction of apoptosis was observed in tenocytes when 25 μg/mL
and 50 μg/mL doses of dexamethasone were administered. The range
of corticosteroid concentration was near to the serum concentration
after oral ingestion, however, it was much lower than the concentration
of a local injection. In this study, the concentration of TA used was
determined as 0.1 mg/mL because it was close to the concentration
after the local injection of TA.[27] In
the present study, the exposure to 0.1 mg/mL of TA caused deleterious
effects at days 7 and 14. These effects returned to the control
level at day 21. Alternatively, the high number of apoptotic cells
in the high TA group at every time point suggests that 1.0 mg/mL
of TA causes irreversible changes to the human tendon cells. These
results indicated that a high concentration of TA may cause irreversible
effects on human tenocytes.The apoptosis pathway induced by TA has not been revealed in
past reports. Lee et al[28] reported
that dexamethasone induces the apoptosis of nasal polyps via caspase
cascades and the Fas-FasL signaling, mitochondrial and p38 MAPK/JNK
pathways. We examined quantitative real-time PCR to reveal the mechanism
of apoptosis in TA-treated cells. The mRNA expressions of caspase-3,
7, 8 and 9 were increased in both TA groups at day 7, indicating
that there was not only drug toxicity but also apoptosis induced
by TA. In addition, induction of mRNA expressions of caspase-8 (exogenous
factor) and caspase-9 (endogenous factor) indicated that both endogenous
and exogenous pathways were activated by TA. In the low TA group,
gene expression of caspase-3, 7, 8 and 9 decreased to the control
level at day 21; on the other hand these expressions remained higher
in high TA group. This result suggested that treatment with low
TA caused a reversible effect during the experimental period in
contrast to the TA group undergoing treatment with high TA.We also examined the cumulative effect of multiple TA administrations
at different intervals. Because a TA concentration of 1.0 mg/mL
showed irreversible effects on the cells, the cells were treated
with 0.1 mg/mL of TA twice at different intervals. The re-administration
at one- and two-week intervals showed decreased cell viability compared
with that in the control group, while re-administration at a three-week
interval displayed no difference in cell viability compared with
that in the control group. These results indicated that it takes
more than three weeks to recover after the initial TA administration.There are limitations in our study. First, the effects of TA
were analysed only in an in vitro system. Since
TA injected locally would be metabolised by the whole body systems,
these results do not reflect the pharmacokinetics in vitro. Although
we determined the TA concentration according to a previous report,
it is difficult to estimate the TA concentration after injection
in the clinical setting. In addition, we did not assess the relationship
between the effect of TA and the numerous numbers of inflammatory
cells in tendinopathy. Further studies are needed to analyse the
cumulative effects of multiple steroid injections on the whole body
systems. Second, the rotator cuff-derived cells that we used may not
have identical characteristics as tenocytes in vivo. Since
the cell was maintained in a two-dimensional culture, we did not
assess its property as a tenocyte.In conclusion, the administration of 1.0 mg/mL of TA caused irreversible
effects on the human rotator cuff-derived cells, while 0.1 mg/mL
of TA showed reversible effects. However, it took three weeks to
recover from the deleterious effects of 0.1 mg/mL of TA. Moreover,
an interval longer than three weeks was needed for the safe re-administration
of TA.Acknowledgments: The authors would like to give
a special thanks to T. Ueha, M. Nagata, K. Tanaka, and M. Yasuda
for their expert technical assistance.
Authors: Benjamin R Freedman; Andreas Kuttler; Nicolau Beckmann; Sungmin Nam; Daniel Kent; Michael Schuleit; Farshad Ramazani; Nathalie Accart; Anna Rock; Jianyu Li; Markus Kurz; Andreas Fisch; Thomas Ullrich; Michael W Hast; Yann Tinguely; Eckhard Weber; David J Mooney Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2022-01-03 Impact factor: 29.234
Authors: Y Ueda; A Inui; Y Mifune; R Sakata; T Muto; Y Harada; F Takase; T Kataoka; T Kokubu; R Kuroda Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 5.853
Authors: P Busse; C Vater; M Stiehler; J Nowotny; P Kasten; H Bretschneider; S B Goodman; M Gelinsky; S Zwingenberger Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2019-03-02 Impact factor: 5.853
Authors: Richard N Puzzitiello; Bhavik H Patel; Enrico M Forlenza; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Answorth A Allen; Brian Forsythe; Matthew J Salzler Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2020-04-08
Authors: Ghada I Abd El-Rahman; Amany Behairy; Nora M Elseddawy; Gaber El-Saber Batiha; Wael N Hozzein; Dina M Khodeer; Yasmina M Abd-Elhakim Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) Date: 2020-05-08